User talk:208.104.231.252

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Contents

[edit] Charlotte CSA Population

Please check the linked reference from the US Census Bureau. The figure you keep changing to is incorrect. Please do not change the figure. Thanks. --Polaron | Talk 07:52, 13 January 2007 (UTC)

You need to update your infrom all updated Charlotte material agrees with me, 03:33, 13 January 2007.

If you're going to change the CSA population, give a source for it and change the 2005 date that goes along with it. Every time you change the CSA population to an unsourced number, you will be reverted because it is incorrect. --TinMan 20:40, 15 January 2007 (UTC)

I did not change it the first time it was change by someone other than you or I,so who gives you the right to change it back,I will change it back everytime you change it,you are not authorize to change it 2.1 million.get a life.
The 2.1 million figure is sourced from the Census Bureau. Unsourced changes to statistics that are already sourced are not acceptable. If you have source, please cite it if you want to make the change. Thanks. Polaron | Talk 23:56, 15 January 2007 (UTC)
As I said earlier you have no right to change infrom that you or I did not put in there Charlotte's CSA Population on this site was 2.4 million I DID NOT PUT THAT IN AND NEITHER DID YOU ,so it is not up to you to change it to 2.1 Million LEAVE IT WHERE IT IS AT. THANK YOU.--
The properly sourced 2.1 million figure was the one in the article prior to an anonymous user randomly inflating various population figures last November. Are you saying that if somebody puts in incorrect information, only the person who originally put the incorrect information is allowed to correct it? That is just absurd. --Polaron | Talk 07:09, 16 January 2007 (UTC)
Where are you getting the 2.4 million number anyway? From someone who accidentally mistyped a 4 instead of a 1? --TinMan 21:50, 16 January 2007 (UTC)

The 2.4 Million is on many Web Sites if you took the time to read them so what are you going to do change every Web Site. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 208.104.231.252 (talkcontribs).

Ok, these sites say 2.1 million: [1], [2]. The only sites I can find with the 2.4 million figure are sites that actually gain their data from Wikipedia itself (notice the language on these sites), for example: [3], [4]. Therefore, there are no official figures that support your 2.4 claim that I can find. --TinMan 04:29, 17 January 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Three Reverts

Hi, and welcome. I see you have been recently trying to contribute to the Charlotte article by changing the population numbers for the metro areas. Unfortunately you have now reverted the changes of other editors more than 3 times, violating the Three Reverts Rule. If you revert the population figures again without providing a credible citation you will be reported to AIV and potentially blocked from editing. Please, helps us build a better encyclopedia by sourcing your additions and avoiding edit wars. Thanks. --Matthew 07:23, 16 January 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Continued reversion of articles

This is your last warning.
The next time you vandalize a page, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia.

You have been asked to explain yourself by three editors and been given every chance to justify your inclusions in Charlotte, North Carolina and Charlotte metropolitan area. Attempting to force the inclusion of this information without a verifiable source is disruptive to the point of vandalism. Please stop reverting other users. --Matthew 07:49, 17 January 2007 (UTC)

[edit] User notice: temporary 3RR block

[edit] Regarding reversions[5] made on January 17, 2007 to Charlotte, North Carolina

You have been temporarily blocked for violation of the three-revert rule. Please feel free to return after the block expires, but also please make an effort to discuss your changes further in the future.
The duration of the block is 24 hours.

Please take more care and use the edit summary

William M. Connolley 10:28, 17 January 2007 (UTC)