User talk:207.164.21.130

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

School IP address Attention:

This IP address, 207.164.21.130, is registered to Trinity College School and may be shared by multiple users of an educational institution. In the case of institutions using proxy servers, this IP address may in fact represent many users at many physical computers.

For this reason a message intended for one person may be received by another and a block shared by many. If you are editing from this address and are frustrated by irrelevant messages, you can avoid them by creating an account for yourself. In some cases you may temporarily be unable to create an account due to efforts to fight vandalism, in which case please see here.


Caution should be used when blocking this IP or reverting its contributions without checking - if a block is needed, administrators should consider a soft block with the template {{schoolblock|optional comment}} as the block reason.

Note: In the event of persistent vandalism, anonymous editing from this IP address may be disabled for up to 6 months at a time while abuse reports may be forwarded to your school administration for investigation in case of long-term abuse by registered users.

Contents

[edit] September 2006

Please do not add nonsense to Wikipedia; it is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. Jacek Kendysz 14:00, 26 September 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Your edit to Chemical warfare

Welcome to Wikipedia. We invite everyone to contribute constructively to our encyclopedia. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing. However, unconstructive edits are considered vandalism, and if you continue in this manner you may be blocked from editing without further warning. Please stop, and consider improving rather than damaging the work of others. Thank you. --Dylan Lake 17:16, 3 October 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Your edit to Austria

Your recent edit to Austria (diff) was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to recognize and repair vandalism to Wikipedia articles. If the bot reverted a legitimate edit, please accept my humble creator's apologies – if you bring it to the attention of the bot's owner, we may be able to improve its behavior. Click here for frequently asked questions about the bot and this warning. // AntiVandalBot 18:23, 26 October 2006 (UTC)

Welcome to Wikipedia. We invite everyone to contribute constructively to our encyclopedia. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing. However, unconstructive edits, such as those you made to Austria, are considered vandalism. If you continue in this manner you may be blocked from editing without further warning. Please stop, and consider improving rather than damaging the work of others. Thank you. — EncMstr 18:49, 26 October 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Your edit to James Bay

Your recent edit to James Bay (diff) was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to recognize and repair vandalism to Wikipedia articles. If the bot reverted a legitimate edit, please accept my humble creator's apologies – if you bring it to the attention of the bot's owner, we may be able to improve its behavior. Click here for frequently asked questions about the bot and this warning. // AntiVandalBot 16:57, 4 November 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Your edit to Parliament of South Africa

Your recent edit to Parliament of South Africa (diff) was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to recognize and repair vandalism to Wikipedia articles. If the bot reverted a legitimate edit, please accept my humble creator's apologies – if you bring it to the attention of the bot's owner, we may be able to improve its behavior. Click here for frequently asked questions about the bot and this warning. // AntiVandalBot 20:23, 15 November 2006 (UTC)

[edit] your edit of Ed Gein

Welcome to Wikipedia. We invite everyone to contribute constructively to our encyclopedia. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing. However, unconstructive edits, such as those you made to Ed Gein, are considered vandalism. If you continue in this manner you may be blocked from editing without further warning. Please stop, and consider improving rather than damaging the work of others. Thank you.

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize pages, as you did to Upper Canada College, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Crystallina 22:29, 24 November 2006 (UTC)

My apologies if you were simply trying to revert previous vandalism. In the future, however, it would be useful to note that Wikipedia would not characterize a person as "crazy" without quotation marks, and it would not even do that unless another notable person (or people) actually made that statement, AND if it was relevant.

As a side note, it's considered good Wikipedia etiquette to sign your posts with four tildes (located in the upper left hand of your keyboard - they look like this ~ ). No big deal, though :)NinaEliza 02:06, 25 November 2006 (UTC)

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize pages, as you did to HTML, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Mbc362 16:10, 15 January 2007 (UTC)

This is your last warning.
The next time you vandalize a page, as you did to Communism, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. --Gutza T T+ 19:55, 27 February 2007 (UTC)

You have been temporarily blocked from editing Wikipedia as a result of your disruptive edits. You are free to make constructive edits after the block has expired, but please note that vandalism (including page blanking or addition of random text), spam, deliberate misinformation, privacy violations, personal attacks; and repeated, blatant violations of our neutral point of view policy will not be tolerated. alphachimp 20:00, 27 February 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Time to Evaluate Our Behaviour Guys... and Girls of TCS.

Well, some of the smarter folks will probably track me down, but let's get to business.

FFS, do you people honestly think that you are funny by editing article? No, it is not funny, not even a bit. It's not even funny and it also makes moderators regard us as idiots. For example, in the Chemical warfare article, "JAMES BELTON IS MASTER OF CHEMICAL WARFARE, BOW BEFORE HIM AS HE IS BUDDAH". What? As if Chuck Norris or Mr. T jokes were not bad enough, you guys put James Belton in. Another example, in Upper Canada College, "principal = Dr. James P. Power (pedifile)". One, is it funny that someone is a pedophile? It's just a sexual preference like homosexual and bisexual. Oh, don't bother with the moral values with me. Mankind had no moral values to begin with. They are just self-justification of your actions and a way to condemn others. Two, you don't spell it "pedifile", learn to spell.

That, however, isn't the point I am trying to make. I am not sure about you, but I am really annoyed every time I go onto Wikipedia and see a warning by the moderators that we are vandalising. Every time I see a warning, I (Yes, I) went to the user who reverted the edit and apologized. Your selfish actions only made others suffer.

If you can't relate to well to stuffs that are not close to you, let's talk about something that has more relevance, like our school's article. This is a really stupid edit war if you ask me. Rigby to "Pigby"? Bickle as the "only real manly house"? "Blessed are the pure in fart"? I don't find what so funny about it. The worst thing that could possibly happen is the "Headmaster's Welcome". I am not sure if the headmaster typed that. If you did do that, I am terribly disappointed at your attempt to advertise. Wikipedia is a free content encyclopedia, note the word "encyclopedia". This is place is an information site, it provides an alternative to searching for stuffs you want to read. It is not a place for edit war. It is not a place to advertise. Seriously, why in the world would you advertise in an encyclopedia? Oh, if you haven't checked the discussion page, I have asked someone to remove it already, which has been done. Thank you anonymous user.

Yes, I am aware that some people are actually contributing to the article. I actually bothered to go through all the edits and see what you guys did. For those who actually did contribute, here's an e-cookie. 207.164.21.130 01:07, 28 February 2007 (UTC)

@alphachimp: Is there anyway to make this topic noticeable to every user on the same IP address? Like how your message makes "You have a new message" pop out? If you happen to come across this page, please help me do it. Thanks in advance.