User talk:205.201.203.71

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Thanks for your contributions to Wikipedia. I've reverted your changes to Mankind Project because they are unsourced. Please read Wikipedia:Verifiability. If you can find independent, reliable sources for these statements, go ahead and add them back with appropriate citations. —Wrathchild (talk) 16:10, 2 November 2006 (UTC)

Have you verified "sourced" the information as is now? NO? YES? If not then why push so hard for the "negatives" of MKP to be "sourced" and not the "positives" of MKP? One sided information.
Or just going with what MKP is wanting to say? The Info that I and others have put on this site is not "made up" information. It is experienced and studied by many people who feel the same.
Wikipedia is an encyclopedia which allows anything to be put up that is "untrue" and "dangerous" to the emotional health of humanity.
Wikipedia seems to be contributing to the dangers that LGAT and cult type groups promote to the world.
Wikipedia has lost its "credibility" with myself and the group I am working with.
A true "encyclopedia" would have both "good" and "bad" info about something, which is what we were trying to do at first. Leave what MKP had put up, and add to it, but that was not good enough either.
—The preceding unsigned comment was added by 205.201.203.71 (talkcontribs).
Please leave your agenda at the door. Yes, I am working on sourcing the information currently in the article. Wikipedia strives to cover both sides of contentious issues. But the "No Original Research" and "Verifiability" standards still apply. —Wrathchild (talk) 13:16, 3 November 2006 (UTC)