User talk:203.87.64.214

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

/Archive 1

Archive

I have archived your talk page, so now the "homophobic hate speech" that you keep complaining about is no longer here but in an archive that anyone can access. I will be protecting the archive to prevent you from disrupting it. Your block, however, stays in place for using open proxies to continue harassing me, just because we prevented you from blanking your talk page. I'm frankly tired of how you think that everyone who opposes you is homophobic for keeping some sort of rant here for the longest time. I'm also tired of you bringing my religion (for no known reason) into all of this. I am not a homophobe. I am not a practicing Jew, and even if I was, I wouldn't be homophobic because of my religion. If you return in a week and continue disrupting Wikipedia by saying users are homophobic, your block will be made even longer the next time. Now, stop being a dick, and get on with your life.—Ryūlóng () 06:34, 19 February 2007 (UTC)

I have not vandalized any pages, except (according to you) my own. Don't take your beef with someone else out on me. That's not fair. Why am I blamed for an anon troll? 203.87.64.214 06:37, 19 February 2007 (UTC)

Because there has been a rash of page blankings from someone claiming that I'm homophobic. You were doing the same. Occam's razor.—Ryūlóng () 06:38, 19 February 2007 (UTC)
Seriously, what the hell is up with this? You were the only one to ever make any sort of complaints, and you're still doing this?—Ryūlóng () 06:44, 19 February 2007 (UTC)
I guess you don't get out that much. There's a large group of users/bloggers who like to disrupt wikipedia. Most of them are left oriented as a "campaign". I posted on their blog a few weeks back when I was blocked the first time. Guess they watch this page, too. Not my fault. I can't control what others choose to do. 203.87.64.214 06:45, 19 February 2007 (UTC)
This is entirely your fault. Whatever you did, tell them to stop now.—Ryūlóng () 06:46, 19 February 2007 (UTC)
How do you return the water once the levees break? Look, there are bigger fish to fry on better sites, they'll give up soon enough, don't worry. 203.87.64.214 06:48, 19 February 2007 (UTC)
Fix it now.—Ryūlóng () 06:58, 19 February 2007 (UTC)
What the fuck was the site you posted this on?—Ryūlóng () 07:29, 19 February 2007 (UTC)
Please don't use language like that. I find that quite offensive. Additionally, It's really annoying having that "new messages" posted on every page I read, try not to leave me any more messages. I haven o beef with you now, but we're not friends, and last time I checked, you blocked me for editing my own user-page. 203.87.64.214 07:34, 19 February 2007 (UTC)
Well, it's a bit of a problem if there continues to be abuse coming to Wikipedia because you got annoyed and decided to get people to disrupt the site because of mistreatment that you receieved. Now, please tell me the website you posted on, so I can get this bullshit done with tonight.—Ryūlóng () 07:37, 19 February 2007 (UTC)
Excuse me, but please don't vandalize my page. I have broken NO WIKIPEDIA RULES in going to an outside source a week ago. If you don't like it, that's not my problem. Like I said, I can't control - not am legally responsible for - what other people do. Please don't re-add items I've deleted. I kept your original warning, that is as far as is permitted. 203.87.64.214 07:42, 19 February 2007 (UTC)
Actually, there are some rules against using outside sources to abuse Wikipedia. There was an arbitration ruling about it.—Ryūlóng () 07:44, 19 February 2007 (UTC)
Well, until it becomes official wiki-policy, I don't need to know it. No precedent exists. Once again, don't edit. All this disrespectful behaviour toward me isn't reflecting nicely on you. 203.87.64.214 07:49, 19 February 2007 (UTC)
Arbitration rulings are official policy. And I have no choice until you tell me the website, because I need this to end now. This has stopped being funny two hours ago.—Ryūlóng () 07:49, 19 February 2007 (UTC)

Let's put it this way; if you give me the URL, I'll leave you alone.—Ryūlóng () 07:52, 19 February 2007 (UTC)

What's the RFAR? I've been trying to Google for it without success. Hbdragon88 07:53, 19 February 2007 (UTC)
I'm pretty sure the MONGO RFAr covers here. And I certainly can't find this website. And as I said, so long as you provide the URL, I'll leave you be and remove the block, as well.—Ryūlóng () 07:54, 19 February 2007 (UTC)
Aren't you being a bit coercive here? I think you might be interpreting the MONGO one a bit too far - that rfar specifically dealt with the posting of such links here. It didn't say that it was illegal to solicit help from any site to help attack here. Hbdragon88 07:56, 19 February 2007 (UTC)
You're right. But there still is something against using off-wiki attack sites to organize attacks.—Ryūlóng () 07:58, 19 February 2007 (UTC)
I suppose metapuppetry would be the thing here. It specifically applies to debates, but I'm sure it can be wideened to include user harassment. Hbdragon88 08:01, 19 February 2007 (UTC)
Well, a bit of an over-interpretation of a ratio, isn't it? Or just pure dicta? Look, I don't take kindly to threats, especially when I did no wrong in wanting to edit my own page. I can email them to try to stop (not that it'll do much good, IMHO). That's the best it's going to be. But I don't take kindly to threats, especially when people deliberately misinterpret rulings in their favour. 203.87.64.214 08:14, 19 February 2007 (UTC)