User talk:203.26.13.4

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Contents

[edit] Your edit to Scientology

Your recent edit to Scientology (diff) was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to recognize and repair vandalism to Wikipedia articles. If the bot reverted a legitimate edit, please accept my humble creator's apologies – if you bring it to the attention of the bot's owner, we may be able to improve its behavior. Click here for frequently asked questions about the bot and this warning. // AntiVandalBot 02:37, 25 July 2006 (UTC)


Please stop. If you continue to vandalize pages, as you did to Iraq, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Ucanlookitup 01:40, 2 August 2006 (UTC)

This is your last warning. The next time you vandalize a page, as you did to John Howard, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. A link to the edit I have reverted can be found here: link. If you believe this edit should not have been reverted, please contact me. TedTalk/Contributions 01:42, 2 August 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Your edit to John Howard

Welcome to Wikipedia. We invite everyone to contribute constructively to our encyclopedia. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing. However, unconstructive edits, such as those you made to John Howard, are considered vandalism. If you continue in this manner you may be blocked from editing without further warning. Please stop, and consider improving rather than damaging the hard work of others. Thanks. Hagerman 01:43, 2 August 2006 (UTC)

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize pages, as you did to John Howard, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. If you feel that the edit I reverted should not have been reverted, please contact me. -- Omicronpersei8 (talk) 01:44, 2 August 2006 (UTC)

You have been temporarily blocked from editing for vandalism of Wikipedia. Please note that page blanking, addition of random text or spam, deliberate misinformation, privacy violations, and repeated and blatant violation of WP:NPOV are considered vandalism. If you wish to make useful contributions, you may come back after the block expires. Bucketsofg 01:47, 2 August 2006 (UTC)


Please refrain from adding nonsense to Wikipedia, as you did to Google. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. 1568 05:33, 8 August 2006 (UTC)

Thank you for experimenting with the page Ugliness on Wikipedia. Your test worked, and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. If you feel that the edit I reverted should not have been reverted, please contact me. -- Omicronpersei8 (talk) 00:05, 22 August 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Regarding edits made during August 29, 2006 (UTC) to Cranky Kong

Please stop. If you continue to blank pages, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. If this is an IP address, and it is shared by multiple users, ignore this warning if you did not make any unconstructive edits. Ryūlóng 05:17, 29 August 2006 (UTC)

Blocked


You have been temporarily blocked from editing for vandalism on Wikipedia.

You are welcome to return and contribute to Wikipedia after the block expires. However if you again vandalise Wikipedia you may be subject to a longer block.

To contest this block please place {{unblock}} below and explain why you feel you should be unblocked.

Josiah Rowe (talkcontribs) 05:24, 29 August 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Your edit to Jack Thompson (attorney)

Your recent edit to Jack Thompson (attorney) (diff) was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to recognize and repair vandalism to Wikipedia articles. If the bot reverted a legitimate edit, please accept my humble creator's apologies – if you bring it to the attention of the bot's owner, we may be able to improve its behavior. Click here for frequently asked questions about the bot and this warning. // AntiVandalBot 01:46, 9 October 2006 (UTC)

Please refrain from adding nonsense to Wikipedia, as you did to Jack Thompson (attorney). It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. If you feel that the edit I reverted should not have been reverted, please contact me. -- Omicronpersei8 (talk) 01:51, 9 October 2006 (UTC)

Adding unrelated external links to articles is considered vandalism. If you continue to use Wikipedia for advertising, you will be blocked from editing. If you feel that the edit I reverted should not have been reverted, please contact me. -- Omicronpersei8 (talk) 04:54, 9 October 2006 (UTC)

Please stop. If you continue spamming, as you did in Constitution of Australia, you will be blocked from editing. If you feel that the edit I reverted should not have been reverted, please contact me. -- Omicronpersei8 (talk) 04:56, 9 October 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Your edit to Viking

Your recent edit to Viking (diff) was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to recognize and repair vandalism to Wikipedia articles. If the bot reverted a legitimate edit, please accept my humble creator's apologies – if you bring it to the attention of the bot's owner, we may be able to improve its behavior. Click here for frequently asked questions about the bot and this warning. // AntiVandalBot 05:26, 18 October 2006 (UTC)

Welcome to Wikipedia. We invite everyone to contribute constructively to our encyclopedia. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing. However, unconstructive edits, such as those you made to Viking, are considered vandalism. If you continue in this manner you may be blocked from editing without further warning. Please stop, and consider improving rather than damaging the hard work of others. Thanks. - RoyBoy 800 07:00, 18 October 2006 (UTC)


[edit] Your edit to Ancient Rome

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize pages, as you did to Ancient Rome, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. A link to the edit I have reverted can be found here: link. If you believe this edit should not have been reverted, please contact me. thadius856talk 04:54, 24 October 2006 (UTC)

[edit] October 30, 2006

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize pages, as you did to George Armstrong Custer, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. A link to the edit I have reverted can be found here: link. If you believe this edit should not have been reverted, please contact me. Anger22 00:47, 30 October 2006 (UTC)

[edit] November 2006

  • Vandalism continues. --Wetman 07:16, 14 November 2006 (UTC)

[edit] January 2006

Thank you for experimenting with the page List of state mottos on Wikipedia. Your test worked, and it has been reverted or removed. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. If you would like to experiment again, please use the sandbox. Pruneautalk 23:01, 6 February 2007 (UTC)

[edit] February 2007

Please do not add unhelpful and non-constructive information to Wikipedia, as you did to Elisabeth Murdoch (senior). Your edits could be considered vandalism, and they have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. -SpuriousQ (talk) 00:50, 21 February 2007 (UTC)

The recent edit you made to Elisabeth Murdoch (senior) constitutes vandalism, and has been reverted. Please do not continue to vandalize pages. If you wish to make useful contributions, read the introduction to editing. Thanks – Qxz 00:52, 21 February 2007 (UTC)


[edit] Elle Macpherson

Your change was determined to be unhelpful and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. Thanks. janejellyroll 04:27, 26 February 2007 (UTC)