User talk:203.19.252.190

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

You have new messages (last change).
This IP has been repeatedly blocked from editing Wikipedia in response to abuse of editing privileges. Further abuse from this IP may result in an immediate block without further warning.
Notify an administrator • contribs • block • block log

Contents

[edit] October 14, 2005

This message is regarding the article Long March. Please stop removing content from Wikipedia that people have worked hard to create. It is considered vandalism. If you want to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. [ contribs • block • block log ] - RoyBoy 800 04:31, 14 October 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Old

Thanks for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your test worked, and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. Thanks. Joyous 01:59, Apr 28, 2005 (UTC)

Please stop adding nonsense to Wikipedia. It is considered vandalism. If you want to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you.Geni 10:52, 15 May 2005 (UTC)

It's people like you who wreck everything for everyone else. Nobody should have told you about this site if they knew you'd just be stupid. Don't bother to come back here again until you can act older than 4 --SuperWiki 18:43, May 15, 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Pro-UK vandalism

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize pages, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia.

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize pages, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. --Cyberjunkie | Talk 11:28, 1 August 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Why can't you do more stuff like the Byron Kennedy article?

This is your last warning. The next time you vandalize a page, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia.

[edit] October 2005

This message is regarding the article Mao Zedong. Please stop. If you continue to vandalize pages, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. [ contribs • block • block log ] -Greg Asche (talk) 01:32, 18 October 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Marketing in schools

Please stop reverting the Marketing in schools article until the Article for Deletion discussion has run its course. Your article is not sacrosanct and it is unacceptable to continuously revert to your text without discussing this in either the article talk page, or the AfD discussion. Remy B 11:51, 26 October 2005 (UTC)


[edit] Vanadalism

This is your last warning. The next time you vandalize a page, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia.

If you feel that you have recieved this message in error, please email me and let me know where you are editing from. Thanks. -- BMIComp (talk, HOWS MY DRIVING) 22:55, 31 October 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Sexual dimorphism

Please stop removing content from Wikipedia. It is considered vandalism. If you want to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Owen× ☎ 01:32, 29 November 2005 (UTC) Please stop. If you continue to vandalize pages, as you did to Singapore, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. VegaDark 08:34, 18 February 2006 (UTC)

[edit] February 19

Please stop blanking pages or adding nonsense to Wikipedia. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you.  — TheKMantalk 07:14, 19 February 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Geelong Grammar School

I've noticed that you're adding some information about The Big Birthday Bash. As this has been copied from the school newsletter, it can't be included on Wikipedia for copyright reasons. You might like to have a read of Wikipedia:Copyrights. Hope this helps. Cnwb 00:06, 20 February 2006 (UTC)

This may have been printed in the newsletter, but I remain the author.

I've removed the section because it doesn't seem encyclopedic in nature. Rather, it is a review of an event. Cnwb 05:06, 20 February 2006 (UTC)

Thanks for experimenting with the page Geelong Grammar School on Wikipedia. Your test worked, and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. Thanks. Cnwb 10:38, 20 February 2006 (UTC)

Please refrain from removing content from Wikipedia, as you did to Melbourne. It is considered vandalism. If you want to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. RobthTalk 21:24, 22 February 2006 (UTC)

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize pages, as you did to Melbourne, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. (ESkog)(Talk) 21:25, 22 February 2006 (UTC)


This is your last warning. The next time you vandalize a page, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Tom Harrison Talk 02:03, 24 April 2006 (UTC)

Your recent edit to Pectinase was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to recognize and repair vandalism to Wikipedia articles. If the bot reverted a legitimate edit, please accept our apologies – if you bring it to the attention of the bot's owner, we may be able to improve its behavior. Click here for frequently asked questions about the bot and this warning. // Tawkerbot2 02:18, 25 April 2006 (UTC)

Please refrain from adding nonsense to Wikipedia, as you did to List of Presidents of the United States. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. A link to the edit I have reverted can be found here: link. If you believe this edit should not have been reverted, please contact me. Geneb1955Talk/CVU 10:58, 4 May 2006 (UTC)

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize pages, as you did to List of countries, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. A link to the edit I have reverted can be found here: link. If you believe this edit should not have been reverted, please contact me. Srikeit(talk ¦ ✉) 11:03, 4 May 2006 (UTC)

WikiProject AFL Hi mate, if you're a fan of Aussie rules, I suggest you take a look at WikiProject AFL (join by adding your name to the list of participants) and the Australian rules football portal. Also take a look at Category:VFL/AFL players and feel free to drop me a line with any questions, or on the WP:AFL discussion page. Cheers!


BUT FIRST OF ALL: CLICK HERE to CREATE AN ACCOUNT

Rogerthat Talk 02:05, 6 May 2006 (UTC)

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize pages, as you did to Geelong Grammar School, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. A link to the edit I have reverted can be found here: link. If you believe this edit should not have been reverted, please contact me. Geneb1955Talk/CVU 03:32, 10 May 2006 (UTC)

This is your last warning. The next time you vandalize a page, as you did to Scotch College, Melbourne, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Stumps 08:20, 10 May 2006 (UTC)

You have been temporarily blocked from editing for vandalism of Wikipedia. Please note that page blanking, addition of random text or spam, deliberate misinformation, privacy violations, and repeated and blatant violation of WP:NPOV are considered vandalism. If you wish to make useful contributions, you may come back after the block expires. --Syrthiss 12:50, 10 May 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Your edit to Geelong Grammar School

Your recent edit to Geelong Grammar School was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to recognize and repair vandalism to Wikipedia articles. If the bot reverted a legitimate edit, please accept my humble creator's apologies – if you bring it to the attention of the bot's owner, we may be able to improve its behavior. Click here for frequently asked questions about the bot and this warning. // Tawkerbot2 23:16, 10 May 2006 (UTC)

Please do not add nonsense to Wikipedia. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. Titoxd(?!? - help us) 23:19, 10 May 2006 (UTC)

This is your last warning. The next time you vandalize a page, as you did to Scotch College, Melbourne, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Stumps 11:22, 11 May 2006 (UTC)


You have been temporarily blocked from editing because of your disruptive edits. You are invited to contribute in a constructive manner as soon as the block expires. Tom Harrison Talk 01:52, 29 May 2006 (UTC)


[edit] July 2006

Thank you for experimenting with the page Aristotle on Wikipedia. Your test worked, and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. DVD+ R/W 01:20, 5 July 2006 (UTC)

Please refrain from adding nonsense to Wikipedia, as you did to Aristotle. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. DVD+ R/W 01:21, 5 July 2006 (UTC)


Please do not remove warnings from your talk page or replace them with offensive content. Removing or maliciously altering warnings from your talk page will not remove them from the page history. If you continue to remove or vandalize warnings from your talk page, you will lose your privilege of editing your talk page. Thanks. // Kevin_b_er 01:26, 5 July 2006 (UTC)

You have been temporarily blocked from editing for vandalism of Wikipedia. Please note that page blanking, addition of random text or spam, deliberate misinformation, privacy violations, and repeated and blatant violation of WP:NPOV are considered vandalism. If you wish to make useful contributions, you may come back after the block expires. Vsmith 01:53, 5 July 2006 (UTC)

Thank you for experimenting with the page Geelong Grammar School on Wikipedia. Your test worked, and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. A link to the edit I have reverted can be found here: link. If you believe this edit should not have been reverted, please contact me. ViridaeTalk 11:22, 23 July 2006 (UTC)

Please refrain from adding nonsense to Wikipedia, as you did to Excalibur. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. DVD+ R/W 00:40, 25 July 2006 (UTC)

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize pages, as you did to Excalibur, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. DVD+ R/W 00:44, 25 July 2006 (UTC)

[edit] August 2006

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize pages, as you did to Othello, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Baseball,Baby! balls•strikes 09:55, 10 August 2006 (UTC)

This is your last warning. The next time you vandalize a page, as you did to Othello, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Baseball,Baby! balls•strikes 10:09, 10 August 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Your edits to June 20

Please do not add yourself or anyone else without a Wikipedia article to the Wikicalendar pages. To have an article, a person must meet the criteria outlined in WP:BIO. Thank you. Fabricationary 23:14, 15 August 2006 (UTC)

Thank you for experimenting with the page Jim Crow laws on Wikipedia. Your test worked, and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. A link to the edit I have reverted can be found here: link. If you believe this edit should not have been reverted, please contact me. mattbr30 10:29, 17 August 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Your edit to Fly

Please refrain from adding nonsense to Wikipedia, as you did to Fly. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. DVD+ R/W 04:29, 22 August 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Your edit to Balafon

Your recent edit to Balafon (diff) was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to recognize and repair vandalism to Wikipedia articles. If the bot reverted a legitimate edit, please accept my humble creator's apologies – if you bring it to the attention of the bot's owner, we may be able to improve its behavior. Click here for frequently asked questions about the bot and this warning. // AntiVandalBot 04:30, 24 August 2006 (UTC)


[edit] Edits to Steelpan

This is your last warning. The next time you vandalize a page, as you did to Steelpan, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. -- Soosed 04:44, 24 August 2006 (UTC)

[edit] List of notable Old Geelong Grammarians

This is your last warning. The next time you vandalize a page, as you did to List of notable Old Geelong Grammarians, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. 24fan24 04:04, 31 August 2006 (UTC)

Welcome to Wikipedia. We invite everyone to contribute constructively to our encyclopedia. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing. However, unconstructive edits, such as those you made to List of notable Old Geelong Grammarians, are considered vandalism. If you continue in this manner you may be blocked from editing without further warning. Please stop, and consider improving rather than damaging the hard work of others. Thanks. If you feel that the edit I reverted should not have been reverted, please contact me. -- Omicronpersei8 (talk) 10:27, 31 August 2006 (UTC)

You have been temporarily blocked from editing for vandalism of Wikipedia. Please note that page blanking, addition of random text or spam, deliberate misinformation, privacy violations, and other deliberate attempts to disrupt Wikipedia are considered vandalism. If you wish to make useful contributions, you may come back after the block expires. Tangotango 10:32, 31 August 2006 (UTC)

Please refrain from adding nonsense to Wikipedia, as you did to Autobahn. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. A link to the edit I have reverted can be found here: link. If you believe this edit should not have been reverted, please contact me. Coredesat talk. ^_^ 02:24, 5 September 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Blocked

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 48 hours for vandalizing Wikipedia. If you wish to make useful contributions, you are welcome to come back after the block expires. Srikeit (Talk | Email) 03:10, 6 September 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Your edit to Pluto

Your recent edit to Pluto (diff) was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to recognize and repair vandalism to Wikipedia articles. If the bot reverted a legitimate edit, please accept my humble creator's apologies – if you bring it to the attention of the bot's owner, we may be able to improve its behavior. Click here for frequently asked questions about the bot and this warning. // AntiVandalBot 01:21, 11 September 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Your edit to Chris Murphy (Canadian musician)

Your recent edit to Chris Murphy (Canadian musician) (diff) was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to recognize and repair vandalism to Wikipedia articles. If the bot reverted a legitimate edit, please accept my humble creator's apologies – if you bring it to the attention of the bot's owner, we may be able to improve its behavior. Click here for frequently asked questions about the bot and this warning. // AntiVandalBot 07:00, 10 October 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Your edit to Harold Godwinson

Your recent edit to Harold Godwinson (diff) was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to recognize and repair vandalism to Wikipedia articles. If the bot reverted a legitimate edit, please accept my humble creator's apologies – if you bring it to the attention of the bot's owner, we may be able to improve its behavior. Click here for frequently asked questions about the bot and this warning. // AntiVandalBot 05:35, 12 October 2006 (UTC)

Welcome to Wikipedia. We invite everyone to contribute constructively to our encyclopedia. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing. However, unconstructive edits are considered vandalism, and if you continue in this manner you may be blocked from editing without further warning. Please stop, and consider improving rather than damaging the work of others. Thank you. Yamaguchi先生 11:09, 15 October 2006

An important message

This notice has been left for you because another Wikipedia user suspects that, perhaps innocently, you may have defamed someone in your contributions. Please recheck your edits. Do not make allegations against someone unless you have provided evidence from a reliable publication, and then make sure you describe the allegations in accordance with our content policies, particularly Wikipedia:Verifiability and Wikipedia:No original research. Don't rely on hearsay, rumours, or things you believe without evidence to be facts, and don't use sources to create a novel narrative. Wikipedia requires reliable sources for all claims. Please see our policy on biographies of living persons.

Comments that defame an individual may leave you open to being sued by them. While Section 230 of the United States Communications Decency Act may protect Wikipedia from being sued for defamation, it may not protect the person who posted a defamatory claim on a Wikipedia page. The Wikimedia Foundation's Board of Trustees has ruled that: "Where the user has been vandalizing articles or persistently behaving in a disruptive way, [personal information] data may be released to assist in the targeting of IP blocks, or to assist in the formulation of a complaint to relevant Internet Service Providers." (Wikimedia privacy policy in full)

If you may have inadvertently defamed someone in an article, do two things:

  1. If the material is still there, remove it immediately.
  2. Leave a note on the administrator's noticeboard saying that you have accidentally included defamatory claims in a named article or articles. Don't repeat the claims. The claim can then be deleted from the page history.

Yamaguchi先生 11:16, 15 October 2006

This blocked user (block log | autoblocks | unblock | contribs) asked to be unblocked, but an administrator or other user has reviewed and declined this request. Other administrators or users can also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy). This unblock request continues to be visible. Do not replace this message with another unblock request nor add another unblock request.

Request reason: "This IP address is shared by the whole of Geelong Grammar School, which has about 1000 pupils. Just because maybe 1 or 2 misbehaved doesn't mean it's fair to block the whole school - there is too much damage to everyone else. It would be great if the block can at least be reduced to a few hours per time, and given similar treatment to say, AOL IP's, etc. Thanks so much"

Decline reason: "see below. Mangojuicetalk 13:50, 24 October 2006 (UTC)"

This template should be removed when the block has expired, or after 2 days in the case of blocks of 1 week or longer.
In response:-
1. Are you a member of the staff? It was close to 9:45PM (AEST) when this request was added. If so, the blocking admin may contact you to reach an agreement regarding student behaviour and possible remedies, however there are no guarantees. If you're a student, this makes no sense with the time zones.
2. In response to "It would be great if the block can at least be reduced to a few hours per time", there is no technical way to do this, and I'm sure that administrators don't want to be re-applying blocks every time of the day. This is not covered as a method under Wikipedia's blocking policy, also.
3. AOL IP's are given special treatement because everyone is reassigned every time they use a page. Hence, considering Wikipedia vandalism rates, on average 98%+ of contributions from an AOL IP would be positive. In this school's case, it has a high percentage of vandalism. Daniel.Bryant 11:05, 24 October 2006 (UTC)
Keep in mind that just because this IP is blocked, it doesn't prevent members of the school from using Wikipedia, only from editing it. Because the vandalism has been so constant, the current block is a month long; it will expire on the 16th. But I guarantee, if the vandalism starts up again, the IP will be blocked again. Hopefully, a month is long enough to get the vandals to lose interest. If not, we'll try 6 months. Mangojuicetalk 13:50, 24 October 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Clarity

  • Geelong Grammar has very many students (1000+). Some students, like myself, do like to positively make a contribution to society after all my homework is done (that's after 9:30pm). It is a real pity that a few students are vandals, and that is inexcusable, but it does not mean that we all are vandals. All of us work off this static IP address. Given this, does it mean that Wikipedia is willing to apply such an extreme measure of collatoral damage, just because of a few individuals? I have around 900 edits (though most are from home and other locations) on my username (now not logged in) and have never come accross something like this.
  • Obviously something needs to be done about vandalism, but is it fair to disable editing access for a whole month just because of this? Could a system not be applied whereby admins block for 24 hours at a time, at every instance? I'm sure administrators would not like to discourage bona fide editors. Otherwise, cannot 'page specific' blocks be used?
  • About 600 edits have been made from this IP. [1]. Not all of them have been made by vandals. About 43 instances of vadalism have taken place (per talk page), and whilst this is inexcusable, this means that 93% of edits are legitimate. Looking at the talk-page history shows that most of it happened within a few minutes, which shows that it is a good idea to use shorter block durations.
  • Are there any other options (e.g. if I use my account, will I be auto-blocked?) available to me. A SSL connection is not permitted at Geelong grammar?

Please can you show me exactly where I am wrong, because I want to make a positive contribution, and find it extremely discouraging that you are limiting me from doing so.

Please review the decision.

203.19.252.190 05:41, 25 October 2006 (UTC)

This blocked user (block log | autoblocks | unblock | contribs) asked to be unblocked, but an administrator or other user has reviewed and declined this request. Other administrators or users can also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy). This unblock request continues to be visible. Do not replace this message with another unblock request nor add another unblock request.

Request reason: "Please review as per above. Thanks"

Decline reason: "I can sympathize with your plight, really -- please don't give up, however, because I have some good news for you: this is what we call a "soft block," which means that once you register an account and log in, you'll be fully able to edit. You will have to register your account from an outside address (home, friend's house, local library, anywhere else with a web connection), but once that's done, you'll be able to edit AND won't have to put up with all this crap from the vandals in your midst. I know it's a hassle, but I highly recommend that route; even if you're unblocked today, it's only a matter of time before another soft block like this is forced by the actions of some perk. Think about it, at least. Luna Santin 09:37, 27 October 2006 (UTC)"

This template should be removed when the block has expired, or after 2 days in the case of blocks of 1 week or longer.

[edit] November 17

Welcome to Wikipedia. We invite everyone to contribute constructively to our encyclopedia. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing. However, unconstructive edits, such as those you made to Synroc, are considered vandalism. If you continue in this manner you may be blocked from editing without further warning. Please stop, and consider improving rather than damaging the work of others. Thank you. Hagerman(talk) 03:32, 17 November 2006 (UTC)

You have been blocked from editing Wikipedia for repeated vandalism. If or when the block expires, feel free to come back, but please make useful contributions instead, and refrain from vandalising or this account will face longer blocks, and action could be taken against the individual who uses it. — ERcheck (talk)

[edit] November 27

You have been blocked from editing Wikipedia for a period of 1 month because of disruptive edits. You are free to make constructive edits after the block has expired, but please note that vandalism, including page blanking or addition of random text, spam, or deliberate misinformation; privacy violations; personal attacks; and repeated and blatant violations of WP:NPOV will not be tolerated. Melchoir 03:17, 28 November 2006 (UTC)
Retrieved from "http://en.wikipedia.org../../../2/0/3/User_talk%7E203.19.252.190.html"