User talk:203.122.225.241

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

welcome, but slow down, most of your edits will be reverted unless you learn about Neutral Point of View and that edits must be verifiable. SchmuckyTheCat 03:50, 23 November 2005 (UTC)

Ahem. I think that someone else needs to learn about NPOV and also vandalism. LOL. You wrote blatant lies in that page. I reverted your edits, and can source that you failed to conform to NPOV - courtesy of the talk page. LOL. 203.122.225.241 08:58, 23 November 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Your message...

...has been replied to at my talk page. Consider getting a user name and logging in, please, it will give your edits more weight. --badlydrawnjeff 13:24, 23 November 2005 (UTC)

This message is regarding the page Mediacrat. Please stop. If you continue to vandalize pages, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Intentionally restoring properly deleted pages is considered vandalism. --Nlu 00:06, 24 November 2005 (UTC)

I didn't realise it had been deleted. lol. I certainly don't consider that to be vandalism. And it was not anywhere near a restoration of what had been deleted. This one was actually factual. 203.122.225.241 09:27, 24 November 2005 (UTC)
Even though you left a message in talk saying you noticed it was deleted 3 times? --badlydrawnjeff 13:16, 24 November 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Wolf Creek

Sorry I didn't use an edit summary (I'm on Wikibreak and am thus lazy), and thank you for contacting me. I removed it because, whereas the producers have actually acknowledged the influence of backpacker murders and Falconio, Snowtown is pure speculation and considerably doubtful. But you are right that it wasn't primarily based on any particular incident. If you can provide a valid reference indicating the influence of Snowtown, then I'm not opposed to its mention in Wolf Creek. It's rather inconsequential to the actual Snowtown murders article, however. As an aside, have you considered creating an account? Thanks,--cj | talk 14:10, 24 November 2005 (UTC)