User talk:203.115.76.59

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

You have new messages (last change).

I have reverted a recent edit you made to the article Michael O'Dwyer. You did not provide an edit summary, and I could not determine whether the edit was vandalism or a constructive contribution. In the future, please use edit summaries. A link to the edit I have reverted can be found here: link. If you believe this edit should not have been reverted, please contact me. KC9CQJ 20:36, 7 June 2006 (UTC)

Your edit did not use edit summaries, as I have stated above, that, and there are still POV statements in the article. (things like "He greatly did this"). You can remove the tag after the POV is taken out, and I still encourage you to use edit summaries. KC9CQJ 21:14, 7 June 2006 (UTC)
Since it seems to be your prime activity in proving me wrong rather than editing Wikipedia (the four edits to my user page as opposed to your ONE removal of a POV tag, I'm figuring I need to tell you exactly what is POV in the article.
  1. He greatly distinguished himself in land revenue settlement work
  2. Michael may have tried his best to heed to the advice of the Viceroy.
  3. But by nature, Michael O'Dwyer was alleged to have been a tough guy and acted like a dictator. No fact citation.
  4. ...well-known manslaughter of Amritsar had occurred on April 13, 1919

...and those are the ones that I'm picking out at first glance. Please, revise the POV from the article if you so desperately want to remove the tag from it. KC9CQJ 21:47, 7 June 2006 (UTC)

I apologise for editing your precious user-page FOUR TIMES (oops.. FIVE Now). However, thanks for showing me the futility of arguing with a stupid pizza delievery boy, when I could have used this time in helping one of my students with his doctorate thesis. Anyway, here is one piece of advice: stick to pizza delieveries and leave complex historical events to real historians (or at least people having education more than punching keyboard between pizza delieveries).

Obviously, I'm not making myself clear. You can take the tag off of the page. You need to remove the point of view from it. You need to use an edit summary. I am not going to allow the page to stand without a POV tag in its current state, nor am I going to permit you to remove the POV tag without decent documentation on the talk page or an edit summary. This is something that I have attempted to tell you on three or four different occasions. If you want to take the POV tag down, you need to revise the article to not include POV, rather than fiddle-faddle around on my userpage.

Personally, I don't care. That is to say, I didn't care, until you launched your personal attack on me in regards to a POV tag and posted the above comments on my talk page. Then you were blocked. Sorry. For your information, I am not dumb, I am not stupid, and I do not deliver pizza because I am stupid. I enjoy what I do, profoundly, because it gives me the time and leisure to edit Wikipedia without having to worry about doctoral students or other constraints on my time. If you're so worried about working with said doctoral students, what in the world are you doing here wasting an hour of your PRECIOUS DOCTORAL STUDENT assistance time by posting on MY user page since I'm such a waste of space in your opinion?

You can keep your real history for all I care. When you fail to follow Wikipedia guidelines to contribute, that's when I get irritated. I could care less what kind of education you have, either, because it obviously hasn't helped with your comprehension of English or your comprehension of Wikipedia policy.

By the way, please sign your comments on other people's user pages with ~~~~ instead of leaving your comment unsigned. It's considered in poor Wiki etiquette not to. KC9CQJ 22:12, 7 June 2006 (UTC)

You have been temporarily blocked from editing for vandalism of Wikipedia. Please note that page blanking, addition of random text or spam, deliberate misinformation, privacy violations, and repeated and blatant violation of WP:NPOV are considered vandalism. If you wish to make useful contributions, you may come back after the block expires. Naconkantari 22:03, 7 June 2006 (UTC)

Retrieved from "http://en.wikipedia.org../../../2/0/3/User_talk%7E203.115.76.59.html"