User talk:200.63.231.224

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

You have new messages (last change).

Welcome!

Hello 200.63.231.224, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! 

Thanks for your contributions to Central Serous Retinopathy. It would be even better if you would create an account and use edit summaries! Cheers, Fawcett5 15:48, 21 October 2005 (UTC)

Np. -Jose

[edit] Ecuadorian Dispute

I apologies for my last edit on the page. But the fact was that the other user simply erased the paragraphs that I have put there (in small, so it could be readed without disturbing the reader).

Honestly, I'm getting tire of the discussion with Andres. I may have made mistakes in the past, I can admit that. But this is getting ridiculous and going nowhere. As I stated before, I'm willing to work in a NPOV article, and I believe that so far I have done it. Personally, I have nothing against Ecuador, but that kind of examples (the behavior of Andres) are a sad example of how nationalism can blind the reason of some people.

If you can gave me your personal opinion in my talk page, I will be more than glad. I may have a bumpy start with the articles ( the war of 1941 and cenepa) but I'm more interesting in working that answering to accusations that have nothing to do with the article and only attacking me. Cheers! and I will restore part of the wording that my rv erased. Messhermit 23:34, 31 October 2005 (UTC)

What I said was of interest to others working on that article, that's why I put it in the talk page. I had seen Andres' changes to the text, and I liked some of the grammar and style changes -- I thought it was unjustified to just revert them without discussion. 200.63.231.224 23:37, 31 October 2005 (UTC)
What I mean in the notes against the Ecuadorian thesis was that, instead of leaving those 78 km as undefined, President Velazco Ibarra used that argument to declare that the whole protocol was invalid. Hope that this will clarify. Messhermit 04:43, 1 November 2005 (UTC)
Retrieved from "http://en.wikipedia.org../../../2/0/0/User_talk%7E200.63.231.224.html"