User talk:195.93.21.65

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Why have I been sent this? I am logged in User: ACEO, not this person. 195.93.21.34 19:42, 10 November 2006 (UTC)

This IP address is that of an AOL web proxy which now sends X-Forwarded-For headers to the Wikimedia Foundation. No further edits should originate from this IP address. For more information, please see Wikipedia:AOL.

If you are an AOL user editing from this IP address, please email an administrator to have the problem corrected. Note that this IP address has been indefinitely blocked, so you will not be able to edit from this address.

Contents

[edit] February 2006

[edit] Feb 18 2006

Please refrain from adding nonsense to Wikipedia, as you did to Medieval medicine. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. TigerShark 23:08, 18 February 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Conker's Bad Fur Day

Regarding your recent edit to the Conker's Bad Fur Day article please read the Wikipedia policy on censorship here. Thanks TigerShark 16:47, 26 February 2006 (UTC)

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize pages, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. -- Миборовский U|T|C|M|E|Chugoku Banzai! 21:27, 26 February 2006 (UTC)

I havent altered anything?

[edit] March 2006

[edit] EastEnders edits

Hi, please stop removing the (EastEnders) disambiguations from the links - for instance Correct link for Grant verses Incorrect link for Grant. Thanks. Stephenb (Talk) 12:06, 14 March 2006 (UTC)

Please do not remove warnings from your talk page and/or replace it with offensive content. Blanking your talk page will not remove the warnings from the page history. If you continue to blank your talk page, you will lose your privilege of editing your talk page. Thanks. --Rory096 16:21, 30 March 2006 (UTC)

[edit] April 2006

Your recent edit to Eiffel Tower was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to recognize and repair vandalism to Wikipedia articles. If the bot reverted a legitimate edit, please accept our apologies – if you bring it to the attention of the bot's owner, we may be able to improve its behavior. Click here for frequently asked questions about the bot and this warning. // Tawkerbot2 16:36, 26 April 2006 (UTC)

Your recent edit to SkyHD was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to recognize and repair vandalism to Wikipedia articles. If the bot reverted a legitimate edit, please accept our apologies – if you bring it to the attention of the bot's owner, we may be able to improve its behavior. Click here for frequently asked questions about the bot and this warning. // Tawkerbot2 22:55, 28 April 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Regarding edits made during April 28, 2006 (UTC)

Thank you for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your test worked, and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. If this is an IP address, and it is shared by multiple users, ignore this warning if you did not make any unconstructive edits. _-M o P-_ 23:33, 28 April 2006 (UTC)

This is your last warning. If you continue to make personal attacks, you may be blocked for disruption. --digital_me(Talk)(Contribs) 22:07, 29 April 2006 (UTC)

[edit] May 2006

Please refrain from adding nonsense to Wikipedia, as you did to The Ordinary Boys. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. —Whouk (talk) 20:21, 10 May 2006 (UTC)

Your recent edit to Vagina was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to recognize and repair vandalism to Wikipedia articles. If the bot reverted a legitimate edit, please accept my humble creator's apologies – if you bring it to the attention of the bot's owner, we may be able to improve its behavior. Click here for frequently asked questions about the bot and this warning. // Tawkerbot2 22:09, 10 May 2006 (UTC)

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize pages, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. RexNL 20:21, 11 May 2006 (UTC)

You have been temporarily blocked from editing for vandalism of Wikipedia. If you wish to make useful contributions, you may do so after the block expires. RexNL 20:22, 11 May 2006 (UTC)

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize pages, as you did to The Bill, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. A link to the edit I have reverted can be found here: link. If you believe this edit should not have been reverted, please contact me. Mhking 22:24, 13 May 2006 (UTC)

Please do not add nonsense to Wikipedia. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. --digital_me(Talk)(Contribs) 20:50, 24 May 2006 (UTC)

This is your last warning. The next time you vandalize a page, as you did to Talk:Elvis Presley, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. A link to the edit I have reverted can be found here: link. If you believe this edit should not have been reverted, please contact me. Crazynas 04:10, 25 May 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Your edit to The City in the Autumn Stars

Your recent edit to The City in the Autumn Stars was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to recognize and repair vandalism to Wikipedia articles. If the bot reverted a legitimate edit, please accept my humble creator's apologies – if you bring it to the attention of the bot's owner, we may be able to improve its behavior. Click here for frequently asked questions about the bot and this warning. // Tawkerbot2 07:48, 31 May 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Regarding your edit to The City in the Autumn Stars

Specifically: This edit: Please do not make personal attacks on other people. Wikipedia has a policy against personal attacks. In some cases, users who engage in personal attacks may be blocked from editing by admins or banned by the arbitration committee. Comment on content, not on other contributors or people. Please resolve disputes appropriately. Thank you. ~Kylu (u|t) 07:53, 31 May 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Regarding your edits to Fraction (mathematics)

Please refrain from adding nonsense to Wikipedia, as you did to Fraction (mathematics). It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. KANNANTALK 09:21, 31 May 2006 (UTC)

[edit] June 2006

[edit] Your edit to Jane Austen

Please stop that. --Bishonen | talk 19:29, 5 June 2006 (UTC).

Please do not add nonsense to Wikipedia. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. Jenks1987 11:20, 10 June 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Edits to 2020

Welcome to Wikipedia. We invite everyone to contribute constructively to our encyclopedia. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing. However, unconstructive edits are considered vandalism, and if you continue in this manner you may be blocked from editing without further warning. Please stop, and consider improving rather than damaging the hard work of others. Thank you. --Crossmr 20:09, 13 June 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Your edit to GIMP

Your recent edit to GIMP was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to recognize and repair vandalism to Wikipedia articles. If the bot reverted a legitimate edit, please accept my humble creator's apologies – if you bring it to the attention of the bot's owner, we may be able to improve its behavior. Click here for frequently asked questions about the bot and this warning. // AntiVandalBot 17:35, 14 June 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Your edit to Mohamed Al-Fayed

This is your last warning. The next time you vandalize a page, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. --MrFishGo Fish 14:18, 20 June 2006 (UTC)

[edit] User page vandalism - Michael jackson

I just guess when I first heard of him I thought that it was because he was born black. I thought that it was racism because, as a black, I know that we have to suffer a lot even though racism is apparently gone in the west. he seems so normal in thriller, don't stop till you get enough and P.Y.T., that I don't know where he went wrong. I don't appreciate you littering my user talk page with garbage, so please refrain from doing it in the future. I am as of yet undecided. I also thought that it was STRANGE that all the families that accused jackson were white, and thought that it was another racist attempt. and I also thought that it was a bit unfair that all jackson's charity work was discarded for this molestation bandwagon. i don't know whether he is deserving of my support, and I would have to actually talk with him to make that decision. and unless some conclusive evidence can be shown, i don't think he is guilty. I trust the american legal system, despite all its shortcomings. also, I personally think that sick freaks like Marilyn Manson are WAY MORE FUCKED UP than jackson. I mean, Marilyn manson is a FREAK. He, or should i say she? is a perverted, self oral-sexing weirdo. it is in my opinion that the only reason that he is not at the front of pop culture is because he is white, and that jackson is only at the front of pop culture because he was born black. i see all of these comparisons and have to question whether people ridicule jackson because of his unproven molestation or because of his former skin colour. --Paaerduag 07:16, 21 June 2006 (UTC)

Thank you for experimenting with the page Guni Guni on Wikipedia. Your test worked, and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. A link to the edit I have reverted can be found here: link. If you believe this edit should not have been reverted, please contact me. Nscheffey(T/C) 10:32, 24 June 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Your edit to Army of Ghosts

Your recent edit to Army of Ghosts (diff) was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to recognize and repair vandalism to Wikipedia articles. If the bot reverted a legitimate edit, please accept my humble creator's apologies – if you bring it to the attention of the bot's owner, we may be able to improve its behavior. Click here for frequently asked questions about the bot and this warning. // Tawkerbot4 22:39, 24 June 2006 (UTC)

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize pages, as you did to Abu Izzadeen, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. A link to the edit I have reverted can be found here: link. If you believe this edit should not have been reverted, please contact me. Mhking 19:12, 25 June 2006 (UTC)

Please refrain from adding nonsense to Wikipedia, as you did to SeaWorld. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. A link to the edit I have reverted can be found here: link. If you believe this edit should not have been reverted, please contact me. Khukri (talk . contribs) 19:57, 29 June 2006 (UTC)

[edit] July 2006

[edit] Regarding edits made during July 6, 2006 (UTC) to Equus (play)

Welcome to Wikipedia. We invite everyone to contribute constructively to our encyclopedia. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing. However, unconstructive edits are considered vandalism, and if you continue in this manner you may be blocked from editing without further warning. Please stop, and consider improving rather than damaging the hard work of others. Thank you. If this is an IP address, and it is shared by multiple users, ignore this warning if you did not make any unconstructive edits. Molerat 18:37, 6 July 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Edit to Gambling

Please do not add commercial links or links to your own private websites to Wikipedia. Wikipedia is not a vehicle for advertising or a mere collection of external links. You are, however, encouraged to add content instead of links to the encyclopedia. If you feel the link should be added to the article please discuss it on the article's talk page rather than re-adding it. See the welcome page to learn more about Wikipedia. Thanks. -- FeldBum 16:21, 7 July 2006 (UTC)

This is your last warning. The next time you vandalize a page, as you did to User:GW Simulations, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. A link to the edit I have reverted can be found here: link. If you believe this edit should not have been reverted, please contact me. GW_Simulations|User Page | Talk | Contribs | E-mail 18:51, 7 July 2006 (UTC)

Please refrain from adding nonsense to Wikipedia, as you did to Stan Collymore. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. If you feel that the edit I reverted should not have been reverted, please contact me. -- Omicronpersei8 (talk) 22:26, 19 July 2006 (UTC)

Please refrain from adding nonsense to Wikipedia, as you did to Chav. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. A link to the edit I have reverted can be found here: link. If you believe this edit should not have been reverted, please contact me. Halo 18:31, 21 July 2006 (UTC)

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize pages, as you did to Chav, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. If you feel that the edit I reverted should not have been reverted, please contact me. -- Omicronpersei8 (talk) 18:32, 21 July 2006 (UTC)

This is your last warning. The next time you vandalize a page, as you did to Chav, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. -- Chet nc contribstalk 18:39, 21 July 2006 (UTC)

Please do not remove content from Wikipedia. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. --Ixfd64 18:10, 23 July 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Your edit to Cuttlefish

Your recent edit to Cuttlefish (diff) was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to recognize and repair vandalism to Wikipedia articles. If the bot reverted a legitimate edit, please accept my humble creator's apologies – if you bring it to the attention of the bot's owner, we may be able to improve its behavior. Click here for frequently asked questions about the bot and this warning. // Tawkerbot4 14:09, 30 July 2006 (UTC)

[edit] August 2006

[edit] Your edit to Joe Lieberman

Please refrain from adding nonsense to Wikipedia, as you did to Joe Lieberman. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox.

But it wasn't me. I firmly believe that my computer was hacked and it was the hackers that did it. Ned Lamont's operatives did it. Honest. I want an investigation.

[edit] Your edit to Kenan Thompson

Welcome to Wikipedia. We invite everyone to contribute constructively to our encyclopedia. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing. However, unconstructive edits are considered vandalism, and if you continue in this manner you may be blocked from editing without further warning. Please stop, and consider improving rather than damaging the work of others. Thank you. --Gray Porpoise 21:35, 22 August 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Your edit to Holkham Hall

Your recent edit to Holkham Hall (diff) was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to recognize and repair vandalism to Wikipedia articles. If the bot reverted a legitimate edit, please accept my humble creator's apologies – if you bring it to the attention of the bot's owner, we may be able to improve its behavior. Click here for frequently asked questions about the bot and this warning. // Tawkerbot4 21:43, 22 August 2006 (UTC)

[edit] September 2006

Thank you for experimenting with the page Mohamed Al-Fayed on Wikipedia. Your test worked, and it has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. A link to the edit I have reverted can be found here: link. If you believe this edit should not have been reverted, please contact me. —Whomp t/c 21:04, 4 September 2006 (UTC)

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize pages, as you did to Chav, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. A link to the edit I have reverted can be found here: link. If you believe this edit should not have been reverted, please contact me. Chodorkovskiy (talk) 18:32, 6 September 2006 (UTC)

This is your last warning.
The next time you vandalize a page, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Sugarpinet 22:07, 14 September 2006 (UTC)

You have been blocked from editing Wikipedia for repeated vandalism. If or when the block expires, feel free to come back, but please make useful contributions instead, and refrain from vandalizing or this account will face longer blocks, and action could be taken against the individual who uses it. --Deathphoenix ʕ 17:29, 20 September 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Your edit to Grand Theft Auto IV

Your recent edit to Grand Theft Auto IV (diff) was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to recognize and repair vandalism to Wikipedia articles. If the bot reverted a legitimate edit, please accept my humble creator's apologies – if you bring it to the attention of the bot's owner, we may be able to improve its behavior. Click here for frequently asked questions about the bot and this warning. // AntiVandalBot 17:09, 21 September 2006 (UTC)

This is your last warning.
The next time you vandalize a page, as you did to Sam Riley, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. A link to the edit I have reverted can be found here: link. If you believe this edit should not have been reverted, please contact me. --Nishkid64 20:59, 21 September 2006 (UTC)
You have been temporarily blocked from editing for vandalism of Wikipedia. Please note that page blanking, addition of random text or spam, deliberate misinformation, privacy violations, and other deliberate attempts to disrupt Wikipedia are considered vandalism. If you wish to make useful contributions, you may come back after the block expires. AZ t 21:03, 21 September 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Your edit to Sam Riley

Your recent edit to Sam Riley (diff) was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to recognize and repair vandalism to Wikipedia articles. If the bot reverted a legitimate edit, please accept my humble creator's apologies – if you bring it to the attention of the bot's owner, we may be able to improve its behavior. Click here for frequently asked questions about the bot and this warning. // Tawkerbot4 23:05, 21 September 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Your edit to Cuttlefish

Your recent edit to Cuttlefish (diff) was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to recognize and repair vandalism to Wikipedia articles. If the bot reverted a legitimate edit, please accept my humble creator's apologies – if you bring it to the attention of the bot's owner, we may be able to improve its behavior. Click here for frequently asked questions about the bot and this warning. // AntiVandalBot 20:26, 25 September 2006 (UTC)

Welcome to Wikipedia. We invite everyone to contribute constructively to our encyclopedia. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing. However, unconstructive edits are considered vandalism, and if you continue in this manner you may be blocked from editing without further warning. Please stop, and consider improving rather than damaging the work of others. Thank you. LittleOldMe 17:34, 28 September 2006 (UTC)

[edit] October 2006

[edit] Your edit to Rose McGowan

Your recent edit to Rose McGowan (diff) was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to recognize and repair vandalism to Wikipedia articles. If the bot reverted a legitimate edit, please accept my humble creator's apologies – if you bring it to the attention of the bot's owner, we may be able to improve its behavior. Click here for frequently asked questions about the bot and this warning. // AntiVandalBot 19:03, 4 October 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Your edit to Harry Potter

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. While the Wikipedia community appreciates your obvious efforts to increase the amount of information on the site, we'd like to point out our policy against original research and for citing sources for the information you provide. This increases the reputation of Wikipedia as a whole and aids in checking the factuality of that article. --Fsotrain09 17:38, 9 October 2006 (UTC)

Please refrain from adding nonsense to Wikipedia, as you did to Harry Potter. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. --Mr. Lefty (talk) 17:54, 16 October 2006 (UTC)

This is your last warning for editing PWI Years (diff). The next time you vandalize a page, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. // AntiVandalBot 18:43, 19 October 2006 (UTC)
This is your last warning.
The next time you vandalize a page, as you did to Richard Gere, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. A link to the edit I have reverted can be found here: link. If you believe this edit should not have been reverted, please contact me. Nibuod 15:21, 27 October 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Your edit to Replay (novel)

Your recent edit to Replay (novel) (diff) was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to recognize and repair vandalism to Wikipedia articles. If the bot reverted a legitimate edit, please accept my humble creator's apologies – if you bring it to the attention of the bot's owner, we may be able to improve its behavior. Click here for frequently asked questions about the bot and this warning. // AntiVandalBot 18:18, 27 October 2006 (UTC)

[edit] November 2006

Thank you for experimenting with the page Aestheticism on Wikipedia. Your test worked, and it has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you may want to do. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. --Geniac 16:43, 7 November 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Your edit to Alexander Fleming

Your recent edit to Alexander Fleming (diff) was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to recognize and repair vandalism to Wikipedia articles. If the bot reverted a legitimate edit, please accept my humble creator's apologies – if you bring it to the attention of the bot's owner, we may be able to improve its behavior. Click here for frequently asked questions about the bot and this warning. // AntiVandalBot 17:52, 9 November 2006 (UTC)


Please do not add nonsense to Wikipedia. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. --Joe Jklin (T C) 18:18, 17 November 2006 (UTC)