User talk:195.93.21.33

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This IP address is that of an AOL web proxy which now sends X-Forwarded-For headers to the Wikimedia Foundation. No further edits should originate from this IP address. For more information, please see Wikipedia:AOL.

If you are an AOL user editing from this IP address, please email an administrator to have the problem corrected. Note that this IP address has been indefinitely blocked, so you will not be able to edit from this address.


Please Don't Vandalise.

Thank you for testing your Wikipedia powers. You really can edit any article! Your test on Cookie Monster worked and was deleted. Please use the Sandbox for future testing.

— Nathan (talk) / 05:54, 22 July 2006 (UTC)

Write what you want about the game only if you've played it.

Contents

[edit] You have been temporarily blocked

Please come back and make positive contributions in the future. Rich Farmbrough 20:47 25 July 2006 (GMT).

[edit] Your edit to Yu-Gi-Oh!

Your recent edit to Yu-Gi-Oh! (diff) was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to recognize and repair vandalism to Wikipedia articles. If the bot reverted a legitimate edit, please accept my humble creator's apologies – if you bring it to the attention of the bot's owner, we may be able to improve its behavior. Click here for frequently asked questions about the bot and this warning. // AntiVandalBot 20:32, 26 July 2006 (UTC)


Please refrain from adding nonsense to Wikipedia, as you did to Fereneze Golf Club. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Archer3 01:33, 27 July 2006 (UTC)

Thank you for experimenting with the page Mel_Gibson on Wikipedia. Your test worked, and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. A link to the edit I have reverted can be found here: link. If you believe this edit should not have been reverted, please contact me. AmiDaniel (talk) 13:15, 31 July 2006 (UTC)

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize pages, as you did to Yu-Gi-Oh!, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. A link to the edit I have reverted can be found here: link. If you believe this edit should not have been reverted, please contact me. Daniel Olsen 21:11, 4 August 2006 (UTC)

Thank you for experimenting with the page Richard III of England on Wikipedia. Your test worked, and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. A link to the edit I have reverted can be found here: link. If you believe this edit should not have been reverted, please contact me. --james(talk) 11:07, 13 August 2006 (UTC)

I have reverted your entry to Craig Bellamy as information introduced into articles must be verifiable from reliable sources, and conform to a neutral point of view. If you have a source, please cite it in the article. Thanks -- Alias Flood 01:56, 15 August 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Your edit to Democratic deficit

This is your last warning. The next time you vandalize a page, as you did to Democratic deficit, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. –- kungming·2 | (Talk·Contact) 15:15, 15 August 2006 (UTC)

This is your last warning. The next time you vandalize a page, as you did to Bishop Luffa School, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. A link to the edit I have reverted can be found here: link. If you believe this edit should not have been reverted, please contact me. Daniel Olsen 17:11, 15 August 2006 (UTC)

Please refrain from removing content from Wikipedia, as you did to France. It is considered vandalism. If you want to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. A link to the edit I have reverted can be found here: link. If you believe this edit should not have been reverted, please contact me. Daniel Olsen 20:16, 16 August 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Should I say this?

Recent comparisons done by Christians semi-prove that dinosaurs existed in Biblical times. Try Google searching for "dinosaurs in biblical times" (no quotes) and see what I mean. Random the Scrambled 12:18, 23 August 2006 (UTC)

Note: This is an attempt at showing this guy that dinosaurs might not contradict the Bible. If there's no need to do this, then please revert this edit.

[edit] This IP address was temporarily blocked

If you create an account you can still edit. Rich Farmbrough 21:20 23 August 2006 (GMT).

[edit] Your edit to France

Your recent edit to France (diff) was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to recognize and repair vandalism to Wikipedia articles. If the bot reverted a legitimate edit, please accept my humble creator's apologies – if you bring it to the attention of the bot's owner, we may be able to improve its behavior. Click here for frequently asked questions about the bot and this warning. // AntiVandalBot 10:54, 9 September 2006 (UTC)

Thank you for experimenting with the page Takato Matsuki on Wikipedia. Your test worked, and it has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. If you feel that the edit I reverted should not have been reverted, please contact me. -- Omicronpersei8 (talk) 09:01, 10 September 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Woman

You are in danger of violating the three-revert rule on a page. Please cease further reverts or you may be blocked from further editing. -- Omicronpersei8 (talk) 16:02, 10 September 2006 (UTC)

Actually, you're only at two reverts. Still: Thank you for your attempts to improve Wikipedia. However, I would like to remind you that Wikipedia is not censored for minors, not even for profanity or pornography. You are welcome to remove clearly offensive material or inappropriate obscenities if they were added as vandalism, but please do not remove/censor profanities or remove/disclaim sexually explicit material or links that are relevant to the article. In the meantime, please be bold and continue contributing to Wikipedia. Thank you!
Also, we do have a policy that instructs that editing to push a point of view is known as disruption, just for your information. Thank you for making good faith edits, though. -- Omicronpersei8 (talk) 16:06, 10 September 2006 (UTC)

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize pages, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. IrishGuy talk 17:14, 10 September 2006 (UTC)

This is your last warning.
The next time you vandalize a page, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. IrishGuy talk 17:15, 10 September 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Three revert violation on Woman

 You have been temporarily blocked for violation of the three-revert rule. Please feel free to return after the block expires, but also please make an effort to discuss your changes further in the future.

Gwernol 17:16, 10 September 2006 (UTC)

You are in danger of violating the three-revert rule on a page. Please cease further reverts or you may be blocked from further editing. -- Omicronpersei8 (talk) 18:41, 10 September 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Woman

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize pages, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. IrishGuy talk 18:49, 10 September 2006 (UTC)

This is your last warning.
The next time you vandalize a page, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. IrishGuy talk 18:50, 10 September 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Blocked for WP:3RR violation

 You have been temporarily blocked for violation of the three-revert rule. Please feel free to return after the block expires, but also please make an effort to discuss your changes further in the future.

Gwernol 00:09, 11 September 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Block discussion

I'd just like to take a moment to diffuse any misconceptions to 195.93.21.33 about the block.

I've noticed your edit notes on the alterations to "Woman" state that you are a Muslim and that is why you find the images offensive. Wikipedia is not censored for people just because of their age or their religion. The image in question is not meant to be offensive, but rather informative about the female body and general outer physical structure, and I completely understand how you find it offensive, but I advise you to take a neutral point of view about the image and to not contest reverts multiple times (see the 3 Revert Rule). --Sivius T-C 00:49, 11 September 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Your edit to France

It might not have been your intention, but you recently removed content from France. Please be careful not to remove content from Wikipedia without a valid reason, which you should specify in the edit summary or on the article's talk page. Thank you. -- zzuuzz (talk) 16:59, 11 September 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Your edit to Roy 'Chubby' Brown

Your recent edit to Roy 'Chubby' Brown (diff) was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to recognize and repair vandalism to Wikipedia articles. If the bot reverted a legitimate edit, please accept my humble creator's apologies – if you bring it to the attention of the bot's owner, we may be able to improve its behavior. Click here for frequently asked questions about the bot and this warning. // AntiVandalBot 16:50, 12 September 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Your edit to Andes

Your recent edit to Andes (diff) was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to recognize and repair vandalism to Wikipedia articles. If the bot reverted a legitimate edit, please accept my humble creator's apologies – if you bring it to the attention of the bot's owner, we may be able to improve its behavior. Click here for frequently asked questions about the bot and this warning. // AntiVandalBot 18:40, 14 September 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Blocked again

This AOL proxy IP is temporarily blocked from making anonymous edits. Either wait for the block to expire, get a different browser (e.g. Firefox), or register. Rich Farmbrough, 18:43 21 September 2006 (GMT).

Thank you for experimenting with the page Much Ado About Nothing on Wikipedia. Your test worked, and it has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. A link to the edit I have reverted can be found here: link. If you believe this edit should not have been reverted, please contact me. Húsönd 17:41, 2 October 2006 (UTC)

Thank you for experimenting with the page Much Ado About Nothing on Wikipedia. Your test worked, and it has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. A link to the edit I have reverted can be found here: link. If you believe this edit should not have been reverted, please contact me. Paleorthid 17:41, 2 October 2006 (UTC)

Welcome to Wikipedia. We invite everyone to contribute constructively to our encyclopedia. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing. However, unconstructive edits, such as those you made to Chamillionaire, are considered vandalism. If you continue in this manner you may be blocked from editing without further warning. Please stop, and consider improving rather than damaging the hard work of others. Thanks. - RoyBoy 800 16:00, 4 October 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Do these comments refer to me?

Excuse my lack of knowledge - do these comments refer to me? If they do - and they don't - how do I prevent this IP address being used by 'an other' or others? ... added at (08:50, 6 October 2006 by 195.93.21.66

Unless you happen to be a very big cheese at AOL, you can't prevent this IP number being used by others. If you create your own username and consistently use it, other people's stupid behavior won't be blamed on you. -- Hoary 09:21, 6 October 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Your edit to The Warriors

Your recent edit to The Warriors (diff) was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to recognize and repair vandalism to Wikipedia articles. If the bot reverted a legitimate edit, please accept my humble creator's apologies – if you bring it to the attention of the bot's owner, we may be able to improve its behavior. Click here for frequently asked questions about the bot and this warning. // AntiVandalBot 14:34, 8 October 2006 (UTC)

Please refrain from removing content from Wikipedia, as you did to Victorian era. It is considered vandalism. If you want to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. A link to the edit I have reverted can be found here: link. If you believe this edit should not have been reverted, please contact me. Khukri (talk . contribs) 17:16, 11 October 2006 (UTC)

[edit] 2006 10 11

Please stop. If you continue to blank or remove content from Wikipedia, as you did to Victorian era, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. --Madchester 18:07, 11 October 2006 (UTC)


Blocked
You have been blocked for vandalism for a period of time. To contest this block, add the text {{unblock}} on this page, along with an explanation of why you believe this block to be unjustified. You can also email the blocking administrator or any administrator from this list. Please be sure to include your username (if you have one) and IP address in your email.

If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia after the block has expired, you will be blocked for longer and longer periods of time.

Please do not erase warnings on this page. Doing so is also considered vandalism. Madchester 20:02, 11 October 2006 (UTC)

--Madchester 20:02, 11 October 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Vandalism of Clare Nasir's article again

Please refrain from adding nonsense to Wikipedia, as you did to Clare Nasir. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. A link to the edit I have reverted can be found here: link. If you believe this edit should not have been reverted, please contact me. Rama's arrow 16:25, 14 October 2006 (UTC)

Please refrain from adding nonsense to Wikipedia, as you did to Clare Nasir. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. A link to the edit I have reverted can be found here: link. If you believe this edit should not have been reverted, please contact me.  (James McNally)  (talkpage)  16:26, 14 October 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Block

To reduce vandalism this IP has been temporarily blocked from anonymous editing. You can still edit by logging on, using a different browser (such as Firefox), using a different ISP or waiting for the block to expire. Rich Farmbrough, 20:01 14 October 2006 (GMT).

Blocked
You have been blocked for vandalism for a period of time. To contest this block, add the text {{unblock}} on this page, along with an explanation of why you believe this block to be unjustified. You can also email the blocking administrator or any administrator from this list. Please be sure to include your username (if you have one) and IP address in your email.

If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia after the block has expired, you will be blocked for longer and longer periods of time.

Please do not erase warnings on this page. Doing so is also considered vandalism. Kukini 16:53, 25 October 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Your edit to Victorian era

Your recent edit to Victorian era (diff) was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to recognize and repair vandalism to Wikipedia articles. If the bot reverted a legitimate edit, please accept my humble creator's apologies – if you bring it to the attention of the bot's owner, we may be able to improve its behavior. Click here for frequently asked questions about the bot and this warning. // AntiVandalBot 15:51, 26 October 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Victorian era

Please discuss what is wrong on the talk page of above article. Please also register a name to give you a better identification. --Bhadani 15:53, 26 October 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Anon editing block for vandalism

You have been temporarily blocked from editing for vandalism of Wikipedia. Please note that page blanking, addition of random text or spam, deliberate misinformation, privacy violations, and other deliberate attempts to disrupt Wikipedia are considered vandalism. If you wish to make useful contributions, you may come back after the block expires. Any legitimate editors using this ip# should edit while logged in. -- Infrogmation 19:13, 2 November 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Elvis Presley

Your recent contribution(s) to to the Wikipedia article Elvis Presley are very much appreciated. However, you did not provide references or sources for your information. Keeping Wikipedia accurate and verifiable is very important, and as you might be aware there is currently a drive to improve the quality of Wikipedia by encouraging editors to cite the sources they used when adding content. If sources are left unreferenced, it may count as original research, which is not allowed. Can you provide in the article specific references to any books, articles, websites or other reliable sources that will allow people to verify the content in the article? You can use a citation method listed at inline citations that best suits each article. Thanks! -- Omicronpersei8 (talk) 00:41, 3 November 2006 (UTC)

This is your last warning.
The next time you vandalize a page, as you did to Fascism, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. A link to the edit I have reverted can be found here: link. If you believe this edit should not have been reverted, please contact me. Hello32020 20:08, 7 November 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Nonsense edit

Please do not add nonsense to Wikipedia. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. // Pilotguy (Cleared to land) 23:13, 14 November 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Edit Summary Request

I have noted that you edit without an edit summary. Please do your best to always fill in the summary field. This is considered an important guideline in Wikipedia. Even a short summary is better than no summary. An edit summary is even more important if you delete any text; otherwise, people may think you're being sneaky or even vandalizing. Also, mentioning one change but not another one can be misleading to someone who finds the other one more important; add "and misc." to cover the other change(s). Thanks! -- Kukini 01:40, 17 November 2006 (UTC)

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize pages, as you did to Ben Thatcher, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Lupin|talk|popups 21:56, 17 November 2006 (UTC)

Retrieved from "http://en.wikipedia.org../../../1/9/5/User_talk%7E195.93.21.33.html"