User talk:195.82.106.64

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

You have new messages (last change).

We have been reverting your edits to article on "veganism" because they do not make sense. All cuisine? And available where? It is simply better off as it already is. You do not need to edit it - all you are doing is making it confusing. I don't see how the supermarket reference isn't needed ,either. Supermarkets are where people buy food. By the way, when you leave a message in somebody's talk, type four tildes (~ symbol) at the end to sign it.  :)

I do congratulate you on many of your edits to make the article more concise - but when conciseness compromises readability and makes it confusing, it's absolutely 100% not worth it anymore. I would also reccomend that you sign up with an account - registered users are generally taken more seriously, as 90% of vandals are too lazy to register an account, and as such, vandalism is more common among anons.

If I were you I'd familiarize myself with the three revert rule or you may risk getting banned. -- Rediahs 17:52, 22 November 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Stop Vandalizing Veganism

Congratulations! Your aggressive edit warring and vandalism have resulted in Veganism being protected. There is absolutely no consensus on the Talk: Veganism page for your edits. Trimming fat is one thing; you are removing material that does not conform to your POV. It is disingenuous for you to claim that disagreements over agriculture are "tiny inhouse politicking", and you know it. Please stop vandalizing the article before your IP gets banned.Skinwalker 16:24, 23 November 2005 (UTC)

Retrieved from "http://en.wikipedia.org../../../1/9/5/User_talk%7E195.82.106.64.html"