User talk:193.164.112.20

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

You have new messages (last change).
This IP has been repeatedly blocked from editing Wikipedia in response to abuse of editing privileges. Further abuse from this IP may result in an immediate block without further warning.
Notify an administrator • contribs • block • block log

Contents

[edit] 2005

Please stop adding nonsense to Wikipedia. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. andy 13:04, 7 December 2005 (UTC)

Stop blanking articles. that is vandalism and you will get blocked if you don't stop. andy 12:41, 12 December 2005 (UTC)

Do not add the contents of Garfield characters into Garfield. The whole reason I made the Garfield characters article in the first place was to keep Garfield under 30 kilobytes. By adding the contents back, you've caused it to become over 30 kilobytes again. — JIP | Talk 11:19, 14 December 2005 (UTC)

[edit] 2006

[edit] January

This message is regarding the page Jr. Pac-Man. Thanks for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your test worked, and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. Thanks. —Locke Cole • t • c 11:24, 10 January 2006 (UTC)

Please stop removing content from Wikipedia; it is considered vandalism. If you want to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Raven4x4x 11:57, 10 January 2006 (UTC)

Regarding the page Jr. Pac-Man, please stop. If you continue to vandalize pages, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. —Locke Cole • t • c 12:01, 11 January 2006 (UTC)

How the bloody hell am I vandalizing it?!?

That's a laugh and a half, because the user Gingerfield rocks (talk) said the exact same thing, verbatim, on his talk page regarding the same edits to the Jr. Pac-Man article. Look: the orange ghost in Jr. Pac-Man is named Tim, and we even have a screen capture there proving this fact. Why you feel the need to keep removing this sentence from the article (along with the picture) is beyond me. And if you and Gingerfield aren't the same person, then you must be communicating by ESP. --Birdhombre 15:13, 16 January 2006 (UTC)

Heh, I was going to ask you to stop changing Bravoman and Beraboh Man into "Berabow Man" but I see you have a vandalism history here...I can just hope you get blocked or grow up...you're at a 3rd level warning, in case you haven't noticed. EpiVictor 12:33, 11 January 2006 (UTC)

The game's name is BERABOW MAN based on Namco's own listings - it says so on the title screen, the high score list and in the end credits of Dragon Saber (1990).

Please don't blank articles such as Tonic the Hedge Frog, even if they are listed for deletion. They are being debated, and if you want the page deleted, vote on the AfD subpage (here). smurrayinchester(User), (Talk) 15:51, 11 January 2006 (UTC)

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize pages, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. -- Longhair 10:53, 13 January 2006 (UTC)

Welcome to Wikipedia. We invite everyone to contribute constructively to our encyclopedia. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing. However, unconstructive edits, such as those you made to David, are considered vandalism. If you continue in this manner you may be blocked from editing without further warning. Please stop, and consider improving rather than damaging the hard work of others. Thanks. Nick Catalano (Talk) 11:00, 13 January 2006 (UTC)

This is your last warning. The next time you vandalize a page, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. -- Cactus.man ✍ 11:04, 13 January 2006 (UTC)
Blocked
You have been blocked for vandalism for 24 hours. To contest this block, add the text {{unblock}} on this page, along with an explanation of why you believe this block to be unjustified. You can also email the blocking administrator or any administrator from this list. Please be sure to include your username (if you have one) and IP address in your email.

Please do not erase warnings on this page. Doing so is also considered vandalism.

{{unblock}} I did not make any unconstructive edits to David. It must have been an abusive sockpuppet.—The preceding unsigned comment was added by 193.164.112.20 (talk • contribs).

Then create your own user ID to avoid getting messages intended for anonymous vandals. PJM 12:42, 13 January 2006 (UTC)

Unlikely claim by anon; last vandalism was 9 minutes before request. Unblock denied. OwenX 23:48, 13 January 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Numatic International Limited

Please don't remove the "cleanup" template without doing the work as specified. --Mel Etitis (Μελ Ετητης) 12:43, 18 January 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Vandalism to Splatterhouse and subsequently Splatterhouse 2

Is it really necessary to continue to edit information that is already correct into older, less informative formats?

Just because the Arcade History Database lists the Splatterhouse release date as "11/1988" does not mean it has to be exactly the same on the article here (regardless of how quickly the AHDB can copy the material into their own article from the article here on the Wiki and attempt to pass it off as their own).

The number eleven would indicate the month "November", so I'd appreciate it if you cease editing it back to numerical format. The same goes for the lines in the Parental Advisory section regarding the boss encountered in the chapel, since the sentence regarding it works as it is without the cluttered parenthetical enclosure and went through not one but two grammatical revisions for it to get to the state it is in now.

The line on the Splatterhouse 2 article in the story section that states "Three months..." that you seem to have a penchant for erroneously changing to "Four years..." is there because it applies to the story contained in the game, not the physical release history of it. Three months is the time frame in the game that separates the events of Splatterhouse and Splatterhouse 2 apart, not when they were released to the gaming public.

Of course, knowing your history, you'll continue to make these erroneous edits and as I have been instructed, I will continue to revert them. Thus far, I haven't missed a step. TheMonkofDestiny 23:39, 18 January 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Berabow Man...round 2 ;-)

Nice try, User:193.164.112.20, but there are more differences than the 6-button control system between the arcade version and the NEC one, so you have to do better than that to make Berabow Man an acceptable stand-alone article, with real information. I'm not saying that it can't be done, but you really need to work on it, and that frankly doesn't seem to suit you so far, but I hope I'm wrong. So far, the article it's just a duplicate of Bravoman done with Search & Replace and still no links to "Namco's own listings", and no real "focus on the original arcade version". EpiVictor 15:29, 19 January 2006 (UTC)

Welcome to Wikipedia. We invite everyone to contribute constructively to our encyclopedia. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing. However, unconstructive edits are considered vandalism, and if you continue in this manner you may be blocked from editing without further warning. Please stop, and consider improving rather than damaging the hard work of others. Thanks. -- GraemeL (talk) 14:33, 24 January 2006 (UTC)

Please stop doing "search and replace" vandalism on Bravoman, by changing "Beraboh man" to "Berabow Man". You keep making unfounded changes, and I will keep reverting. I have saved the current revision on disk, so you there's NFW you can get away with it. Oh, and BTW, if you really want to be an "anonymous vandal" at least consider getting yourself a dynamic IP, because you're on your way to get THIS IP banned, boy. EpiVictor 14:19, 27 January 2006 (UTC)


Please stop. If you continue to vandalize pages, as you did to Mule, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. --Kbh3rdtalk 17:51, 21 February 2006 (UTC)

I did not vandalise Mule. It must have been an abusive sockpuppet.

  1. Why don't you stick to your User:Gingerfield rocks account?
  2. This IP address was used for vandalism, hence the message. It makes no sense to accuse a sock-puppet. --Mel Etitis (Μελ Ετητης) 12:00, 22 February 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Posts from repeat-leaver

[edit] I'm leaving

I've decided to do what Gingerfield rocks did 2 days ago: leave Wikipedia. Goodbye. 193.164.112.20 12:53, 2 March 2006 (UTC)

I have decided to leave Wikipedia because you have suspected me of being a sockpuppet or impersonator of Gingerfield rocks. Which I am not. Goodbye. 193.164.112.20 09:22, 3 March 2006 (UTC)

Would people please stop changing my user page to make it look like I am a sockpuppet or impersonator of Gingerfield rocks? I have nothing to do with him whatsoever! 193.164.112.20 08:25, 7 March 2006 (UTC)

  • If you ever do actually leave, then this will be irrelevant, but please stop treating this page and User:193.164.112.20 as yours. An editing account gives you a User page and Talk page; this is simply the Talk page of an anonymous IP address — not yours or anyone's. --Mel Etitis (Μελ Ετητης) 22:29, 7 March 2006 (UTC)

This is your last warning. The next time you vandalize a page, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. You didnt leave. You added bad edits to a article. Whopper 12:03, 9 March 2006 (UTC)

You have been temporarily blocked from editing for vandalism of Wikipedia. Please note that page blanking, addition of random text or spam, deliberate misinformation, privacy violations, and repeated and blatant violation of WP:NPOV are considered vandalism. If you wish to make useful contributions, you may come back after the block expires. --Mel Etitis (Μελ Ετητης) 22:32, 9 March 2006 (UTC)

[edit] OK, that's quite enough

So you're "leaving", huh? But all I and other see is the same unconstructive edits to Namco articles. AND, before replying "How the bloody hell am I making unconstructive edits", take note that:

  • a) This account has been exclusively used for similar, mostly blanking of, vandalizing or addition of dubious information to Namco and other videogame-related articles.
  • b) Despite your denying any connection with Gingerfield Rocks, these two accounts have an incredibly similar editing history, many of the rare replies and writing style are IDENTICAL (How the bloody hell am I making unconstructive edits, I did NOT vandalise..., etc.)
  • c) MOST IMPORTANT, despite you two having the same "goals" and "interests" inside of wikipedia, there's NOT ONE SINGLE INSTANCE of discussion/interaction/cooperation between you (AND, it's too late to come up with fictitious discussions, sorry :-) .
  • d) This account seems to be used in a vain hope of making "anonymous" or "untraceable" edits instead of the main gingerfield account. Sorry, but it's VERY WELL TRACEABLE, as you may have understood.
  • e) Both gingerfield/this account follow the same tactic: "strike", hide away or get blocked for a while, then "strike" again when (apparently) attention and watch over the targeted articles has loosened... but that's the problem: watchlists NEVER loose ;-)
  • f) We were not born yesterday...and it can be spotted a mile away what flies and what not...and this failed impersonation/hiding attempt surely doesn't fly.

In other words, YOU ARE NOT CONVINVING ANYONE, and you have shown no sign of adjusting your behavior according to wikipedia standards. You're not the only one, either, and the admins usually don't have time to actively hunt down "problematic" cases like this one...nothing is decided yet about Gingerfield/this account, so you could very well learn to behave and start doing more serious work inside wikipedia. EpiVictor 16:55, 13 March 2006 (UTC)

Thanks for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your test worked, and has been reverted or removed by an automated bot. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. Thanks. If you feel you have received this notice in error, please contact the bot owner // Tawkerbot2 13:21, 21 March 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Minor vandalism at Imperial Guard (Warhammer 40,000)

Thanks for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your test worked, and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. Thanks. CaptainVindaloo 17:43, 24 March 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Block

You have been temporarily blocked from editing for vandalism of Wikipedia. Please note that page blanking, addition of random text or spam, deliberate misinformation, privacy violations, and repeated and blatant violation of WP:NPOV are considered vandalism. If you wish to make useful contributions, you may come back after the block expires. --Mel Etitis (Μελ Ετητης) 21:07, 24 March 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Tinkle Pit

We've discussed this already. The most recent add in Tinkle Pit you've made is considered plagiarism, and it's unacceptable. a) You've done this once before, and b) You've shown a reckless disregard for the thoughts of others since Day 1. Why haven't you been banned yet? Spamguy 13:01, 3 May 2006 (UTC)

That wasn't plagiarism. I wrote my own version of it this time as there are no references to Galaxian, Galaga, Gaplus, Baraduke, Motos, Valkyrie No Densetsu or Cosmo Gang the Video in the Arcade History Database. 193.164.112.20 (this comment in fact left by Gingerfield rocks (talk • contribs))

Eh, I guess you're right. Based on your precedence of copying from Arcade-History and the similarities between the introductory lines ('Tinkle Pit is a Namco museum, a LOT of Namco characters (from early Namco games) appear in this game, here is a list' versus 'A lot of characters from earlier Namco games appear in this game, here is a list'), I automatically assumed it was another copy/paste job. Very sorry about that. I've restored the list. Spamguy 20:45, 3 May 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Vandalism

You have recently vandalized a Wikipedia article, and you are now being asked to stop this type of behavior. You're welcome to continue editing Wikipedia, so long as these edits are constructive. Please see Wikipedia's Blocking policy and what constitutes vandalism; such actions are not tolerated on Wikipedia, and are not taken lightly.

We hope that you will become a legitimate editor and create an account. Again, you are welcome here at Wikipedia, but remember not to vandalize or you will soon be blocked from editing.

If you feel you have received this message in error, it may be because you are using a shared IP address. Nevertheless, repeated vandalism from this address may cause you to be included in any future punishments such as temporary blocks or bans. To avoid confusion in the future, we invite you to create a user account of your own.

Kafziel 13:00, 4 May 2006 (UTC)

Please refrain from adding nonsense to Wikipedia, as you did to Lightsaber. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Kafziel 13:02, 4 May 2006 (UTC)


Welcome to Wikipedia. We invite everyone to contribute constructively to our encyclopedia. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing. However, unconstructive edits are considered vandalism, and if you continue in this manner you may be blocked from editing without further warning. Please stop, and consider improving rather than damaging the hard work of others. Thank you.

Your recent edit to Animal Crossing: Wild World was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to recognize and repair vandalism to Wikipedia articles. If the bot reverted a legitimate edit, please accept my humble creator's apologies – if you bring it to the attention of the bot's owner, we may be able to improve its behavior. Click here for frequently asked questions about the bot and this warning. // Tawkerbot2 11:53, 8 May 2006 (UTC)

This is your last warning. The next time you vandalize a page, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Kafziel 12:02, 8 May 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Block

You have been blocked from editing Wikipedia for repeated vandalism. If or when the block expires, please refrain from vandalizing or this account will face longer blocks, and action could be taken against the individual who uses it. --Mel Etitis (Μελ Ετητης) 15:54, 15 May 2006 (UTC)

[edit] 19 May 2006

Welcome to Wikipedia. We invite everyone to contribute constructively to our encyclopedia. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing. However, unconstructive edits are considered vandalism, and if you continue in this manner you may be blocked from editing without further warning. Please stop, and consider improving rather than damaging the hard work of others. Thank you. - Nick C 09:52, 19 May 2006 (UTC)

[edit] 19 May 2006

You have been blocked from editing Wikipedia for repeated vandalism. If or when the block expires, please refrain from vandalizing or this account will face longer blocks, and action could be taken against the individual who uses it. --Mel Etitis (Μελ Ετητης) 14:16, 19 May 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Your edit to Lewis

Your recent edit to Lewis was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to recognize and repair vandalism to Wikipedia articles. If the bot reverted a legitimate edit, please accept my humble creator's apologies – if you bring it to the attention of the bot's owner, we may be able to improve its behavior. Click here for frequently asked questions about the bot and this warning. // Tawkerbot2 09:29, 5 June 2006 (UTC)

[edit] More Bravoman/Namco issues

One would expect that you'd back off from vandalizing Bravoman and other Namco articles, especially since it has been amply confirmed that you're User:Gingerfield rocks.

And before you reply "How the bloody hell am I vandalizing it ?!" remember that repeated (or, if you prefer, three (3) subsequent reversals/replacements of a sentence/section/part of the article) are considered vandalism by official Wikipedia policy, and you just hit the limit with your last edits to Bravoman.

Not that you'd care, but you just make your position worse, and just pave your road to be permanently banned from editing wikipedia (not that it would be much of a loss, quite the opposite). EpiVictor 14:24, 9 June 2006 (UTC)

Would some admin please ban usernames Gingerfield rocks, Puckman765, Pac-Man765 and IP address 193.164.112.20 permanently. It is quite obvious that this person will not stop his constant nuisance edits particularly to the Namco games articles. 15:20, 12 June 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Your edit to MSN

Your recent edit to MSN was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to recognize and repair vandalism to Wikipedia articles. If the bot reverted a legitimate edit, please accept my humble creator's apologies – if you bring it to the attention of the bot's owner, we may be able to improve its behavior. Click here for frequently asked questions about the bot and this warning. // Tawkerbot2 09:43, 15 June 2006 (UTC)

[edit] June 27 2006

Your recent edits to Pope Benedict I have been removed. Please refrain from making any further noncontructive edits to Wikipedia or it is likely that you will be banned. Shadow1 12:13, 27 June 2006 (UTC)

Please refrain from adding nonsense to Wikipedia, as you did to Automobile. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. A link to the edit I have reverted can be found here: link. If you believe this edit should not have been reverted, please contact me. Anand(talk) 12:16, 27 June 2006 (UTC)

This is your last warning. The next time you vandalize a page, as you did to Salutation, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. A link to the edit I have reverted can be found here: link. If you believe this edit should not have been reverted, please contact me. Anand(talk) 12:18, 27 June 2006 (UTC)
You have been temporarily blocked from editing for vandalism of Wikipedia. Please note that page blanking, addition of random text or spam, deliberate misinformation, privacy violations, and repeated and blatant violation of WP:NPOV are considered vandalism. If you wish to make useful contributions, you may come back after the block expires. Lectonar 12:26, 27 June 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Regarding edits made during July 6, 2006

Welcome to Wikipedia. We invite everyone to contribute constructively to our encyclopedia. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing. However, unconstructive edits are considered vandalism, and if you continue in this manner you may be blocked from editing without further warning. Please stop, and consider improving rather than damaging the hard work of others. Thank you. If this is an IP address, and it is shared by multiple users, ignore this warning if you did not make any unconstructive edits. Tangotango 12:02, 6 July 2006 (UTC)
This is your last warning. The next time you vandalize a page, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Tangotango 12:07, 6 July 2006 (UTC)
This is your last warning. The next time you vandalize a page, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia.

Sarah Ewart (Talk) 12:12, 6 July 2006 (UTC)

You have been temporarily blocked from editing for vandalism of Wikipedia. Please note that page blanking, addition of random text or spam, deliberate misinformation, privacy violations, and repeated and blatant violation of WP:NPOV are considered vandalism. If you wish to make useful contributions, you may come back after the block expires. Lectonar 12:24, 6 July 2006 (UTC)

[edit] September, 2006

Thank you for experimenting with the page People on Wikipedia. Your test worked, and it has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. A link to the edit I have reverted can be found here: link. If you believe this edit should not have been reverted, please contact me. :) Dlohcierekim 12:20, 7 September 2006 (UTC)

Thank you for experimenting with the page Ballet tutu on Wikipedia. Your test worked, and it has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. A link to the edit I have reverted can be found here: link. If you believe this edit should not have been reverted, please contact me. :) Dlohcierekim 12:21, 7 September 2006 (UTC)

Please refrain from adding nonsense to Wikipedia, as you did to Toto (band). It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. A link to the edit I have reverted can be found here: link. If you believe this edit should not have been reverted, please contact me. :) Dlohcierekim 12:22, 7 September 2006 (UTC)

Thank you for experimenting with the page Brush on Wikipedia. Your test worked, and it has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. A link to the edit I have reverted can be found here: link. If you believe this edit should not have been reverted, please contact me. :) Dlohcierekim 12:23, 7 September 2006 (UTC)

Please refrain from adding nonsense to Wikipedia, as you did to Pope Mark IV of Alexandria. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. A link to the edit I have reverted can be found here: link. If you believe this edit should not have been reverted, please contact me. :) Dlohcierekim 12:23, 7 September 2006 (UTC)

Please refrain from adding nonsense to Wikipedia, as you did to Mark IV Amphibian. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. A link to the edit I have reverted can be found here: link. If you believe this edit should not have been reverted, please contact me. :) Dlohcierekim 12:24, 7 September 2006 (UTC)

Thank you for experimenting with the page Talk:Solo family on Wikipedia. Your test worked, and it has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. A link to the edit I have reverted can be found here: link. If you believe this edit should not have been reverted, please contact me. :) Dlohcierekim 12:25, 7 September 2006 (UTC)

Thank you for experimenting with the page Talk:List of minor Star Wars characters on Wikipedia. Your test worked, and it has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. A link to the edit I have reverted can be found here: link. If you believe this edit should not have been reverted, please contact me. :) Dlohcierekim 12:25, 7 September 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Your edit to Clone troopers

Your recent edit to Clone troopers (diff) was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to recognize and repair vandalism to Wikipedia articles. If the bot reverted a legitimate edit, please accept my humble creator's apologies – if you bring it to the attention of the bot's owner, we may be able to improve its behavior. Click here for frequently asked questions about the bot and this warning. // AntiVandalBot 11:48, 11 September 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Your edit to Distribution (business)

Your recent edit to Distribution (business) (diff) was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to recognize and repair vandalism to Wikipedia articles. If the bot reverted a legitimate edit, please accept my humble creator's apologies – if you bring it to the attention of the bot's owner, we may be able to improve its behavior. Click here for frequently asked questions about the bot and this warning. // AntiVandalBot 13:47, 25 September 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Your edit to Andrew Lloyd Webber

Your recent edit to Andrew Lloyd Webber (diff) was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to recognize and repair vandalism to Wikipedia articles. If the bot reverted a legitimate edit, please accept my humble creator's apologies – if you bring it to the attention of the bot's owner, we may be able to improve its behavior. Click here for frequently asked questions about the bot and this warning. // Tawkerbot4 12:00, 2 October 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Regarding edits made during October 2, 2006

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize pages, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. If this is an IP address, and it is shared by multiple users, ignore this warning if you did not make any unconstructive edits. Tangotango 12:21, 2 October 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Regarding edits made during October 5, 2006 (UTC) to Walloons

Please do not add nonsense to Wikipedia; it is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. If this is an IP address, and it is shared by multiple users, ignore this warning if you did not make any unconstructive edits. MER-C 12:10, 5 October 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Your edit to Walloons

Your recent edit to Walloons (diff) was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to recognize and repair vandalism to Wikipedia articles. If the bot reverted a legitimate edit, please accept my humble creator's apologies – if you bring it to the attention of the bot's owner, we may be able to improve its behavior. Click here for frequently asked questions about the bot and this warning. // AntiVandalBot 12:13, 5 October 2006 (UTC)

This is your last warning.
The next time you vandalize a page, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. MER-C 12:14, 5 October 2006 (UTC)
You have been blocked from editing for violating Wikipedia policy by continued vandalism following return from 13 previous blocks. If you believe this block is unjustified you may contest this block by replying here on your talk page by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}}. You may also email the blocking administrator or any administrator from this list instead, or mail unblock-en-l@mail.wikimedia.org. /wangi 13:07, 5 October 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Regarding edits made 26 February 2007 to North-South divide in the United Kingdom

Welcome, and thank you for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your test worked, and it has been reverted or removed. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Rettetast 14:27, 26 February 2007 (UTC)


Please do not add unhelpful and non-constructive information to Wikipedia, as you did to North-South divide in the United Kingdom. Your edits could be considered vandalism, and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Will (aka Wimt) 14:32, 26 February 2007 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, please ignore this notice
Hi, the recent edit you made to Gordon Brown has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thanks – Qxz 14:24, 2 March 2007 (UTC)

Please do not add unhelpful and non-constructive information to Wikipedia, as you did to Friedrich Ebert. Your edits could be considered vandalism, and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. - Denny 14:29, 2 March 2007 (UTC)

[edit] March 14, 2007

Please do not add commentary or your own personal analysis to Wikipedia articles, as you did to Kibble. Doing so violates Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you.

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Adam, you will be blocked from editing.

This is your last warning. The next time you violate Wikipedia's biographies of living persons policy by inserting unsourced defamatory content into an article, as you did to Michael Jackson's Moonwalker, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Kariteh 15:53, 14 March 2007 (UTC)

This is your last warning. The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to User:NawlinWiki, you will be blocked from editing. Kafziel Talk 13:04, 15 March 2007 (UTC)
Retrieved from "http://en.wikipedia.org../../../1/9/3/User_talk%7E193.164.112.20.html"