Talk:1931 Yellow River flood
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
I'm not sure that 1931 counts as "historic times".
- As in recorded history - not prehistoric times. Warofdreams 10:34, 19 Jan 2005 (UTC)
- It still strikes me as awkward. Maybe "recorded natural disaster" rather than "natural disaster of historic times".
- I say we keep it. I do not find it awkward, but rather an interesting tidbit. --SaulPerdomo
- It still strikes me as awkward. Maybe "recorded natural disaster" rather than "natural disaster of historic times".
it was bad but is over so if you dont like the page wikipedia has writen go write your own or simply look on another website 1931 was over 7 decades ago and id call that history ( histroic ) but then again i dont know 203.59.165.244 06:52, 9 May 2006 (UTC) bella
[edit] Death toll in the 1938 flood
Is it a political decision not to mention the 500,000 to 900,000 Chinese lives lost as a result of a deliberate act of breaching the dykes because it was ordered by US ally Chiang Kai Shek? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Herne nz (talk • contribs) 08:21, 27 January 2007 (UTC).
Read the title of the article. If you want to compare the death toll of Yellow River floods, create a Yellow River floods article.--Skyfiler 17:43, 27 January 2007 (UTC)
i dont know a single silly thing your talking about!!!!!!!!!!