User talk:192.197.71.189

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Just a note clarifying the goatse.cx vandalism of the main page on 11/16/04. It has been confirmed via developer access to the Squid logs that this anon was indeed NOT responsible. A different IP address used a User name that was identical to this IP address. This IP address should be considered blameless. --Dante Alighieri | Talk 21:39, Nov 17, 2004 (UTC)

Yay! I can play in the sandbox again!! 192.197.71.189 21:44, 17 Nov 2004 (UTC)

bleah :-P

Please stop filling the sandbox. It becomes unusable for others. Fredrik | talk 17:57, 21 Dec 2004 (UTC)

Contents

[edit] Oak Island

I saw your comments on the Oak Island article and replaced them with a NPOV tag. Can you pop over to the Oak Island talk page and elaborate on what can be done to improve the article? --NormanEinstein 18:12, 30 May 2005 (UTC)

If you have a problem with the Oak Island article please drop by the talk page and elaborate on your position so we can all work together to improve it. In your edits you've said that dissenting opinions and opposing viewpoints are delelted, but you've made no attempt (at least recently) to add anything constructive to the article. I'm not even sure if you think the article slants too much toward stating the treasure as fact or legend. We're willing to listen to your issues with the article if you'd let us. --NormanEinstein 17:39, 6 Jun 2005 (UTC)
I concur with NormanEinstein. Please tell us on the Oak Island talk page what bothers you about the article. I would like to hear your point of view. --JonathanFreed 05:32, 10 Jun 2005 (UTC)
Could you please stop adding your personal disclaimer that you don't agree with the Oak Island article? We've invited you to express your opinions and help to improve the article, but your repeated additions border on vandalism. If you continue this activity you might be banned. --NormanEinstein 18:13, Jun 20, 2005 (UTC)
Blocked for 24 hours for readding the non-specific note to the top of the Oak Island article, and not using the talk page to detail any problems. Thue | talk 19:06, 24 Jun 2005 (UTC)

If you wish to dispute the contents of an article, please tag it as NPOV using Template:TotallyDisputed and discuss it on the talk page. You complaints will not be taken seriously unless you participate in the discussion. -Loren 18:56, 17 August 2005 (UTC)

Keep in mind that Wikipedia operates by consensus. If you want an article to improve, you need to collaborate in consensus-building activities. You may argue that the current Oak Island article is factually wrong, or factually correct but presented in a biased way, or both. However, if you don't provide actionable information ("X is incorrect, the correct information is Y", or "I think that saying Z is biased"), it's unreasonable to expect the article to improve (or change at all). Repeatedly inserting a notice at the top of the article is inappropriate: you can insert an appropriate template message (e.g. {{NPOV}}), but then be prepared to state your objection on the article's talk page and to work with other editors on an improved version. If you don't make specific suggestions, someone will likely remove the notice and consider the matter closed. Thanks, and happy editing, --MarkSweep 20:05, 18 August 2005 (UTC)

You've added the same disclaimer to Oak Island article every work day for two weeks in a row. Isn't there something at Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada that you could be working on instead of vandalising Wikipedia? --NormanEinstein 16:17, August 19, 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Ottawa Senators

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize pages, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. ccwaters 20:24, 1 November 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Afd Notices

Please do not remove Afd notices from articles while the discussion is in progress. --Ezeu 23:05, 1 June 2006 (UTC)

Please stop removing Articles for deletion notices or comments from articles and Articles for deletion pages-- it is considered vandalism. You may comment at the respective page if you oppose an article's deletion. Thanks. Shell babelfish 17:58, 2 June 2006 (UTC)

[edit] User:Paddles

If you are User:Paddles, please login before continuing to edit this userspace. Thank you! DGX 18:07, 2 June 2006 (UTC)

This person is not me. If you are going to try and have an article deleted for vanity, then (a) be a bit more careful about following the instructions and (b) remember the "vanity" rule applies to articles in the main WP space, not in the User: space. I have never claimed enough notability to have an article in the main article space. Paddles TC 02:11, 3 June 2006 (UTC)

Please refrain from adding nonsense to Wikipedia, as you did to 4:21. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. A link to the edit I have reverted can be found here: link. If you believe this edit should not have been reverted, please contact me. hoopydinkConas tá tú? 18:52, 14 July 2006 (UTC)

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize pages, as you did to 4:21, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Tuspm Talk | Contribs | E-Mail Me 18:53, 14 July 2006 (UTC)

Do not put nonsense to Wikipedia pages, as you did to Kaworu Nagisa. It is considered vandalism, and you may be blocked at further attempts. (Wikimachine 01:02, 9 November 2006 (UTC))

[edit] Your edit to Compaq Presario

Your recent edit to Compaq Presario (diff) was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to recognize and repair vandalism to Wikipedia articles. If the bot reverted a legitimate edit, please accept my humble creator's apologies – if you bring it to the attention of the bot's owner, we may be able to improve its behavior. Click here for frequently asked questions about the bot and this warning. // AntiVandalBot 19:32, 23 November 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Please cite sources

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! We welcome and appreciate your contributions, such as Lucas Bryant, but we regretfully cannot accept original research. Please find and add a reliable citation to your recent edit so we can verify your work. Uncited information may be removed at any time. Thanks for your efforts, and happy editing! Can't sleep, clown will eat me 01:32, 5 January 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Don't edit other's userpages

As you did at User:Keith Ranville. Wikipedia isn't a messageboard and editing another editor's userpage without their permission is at best impolite and at worst vandalism.--Isotope23 15:17, 15 March 2007 (UTC)

Your post appears to violate WP:LEGAL as well. Don't make legal threats; that is a blockable offense.--Isotope23 15:21, 15 March 2007 (UTC)

[edit] External links

Please do not add inappropriate external links to Wikipedia, as you did with links to piano-keyboard-reviews.com (*|search current). Wikipedia is not a mere directory of links nor should it be used for advertising or promotion. Inappropriate links include (but are not limited to) links to personal web sites, links to web sites with which you are affiliated, and links that exist to attract visitors to a web site or promote a product. See the external links guideline and spam policies for further explanations of links that are considered appropriate. Since Wikipedia uses Nofollow tags, additions of links to Wikipedia will not alter search engine rankings. If you feel the link should be added to the article, then please discuss it on the article's talk page rather than re-adding it. See the welcome page to learn more about Wikipedia. Thank you. Femto 15:05, 6 April 2007 (UTC)

Retrieved from "http://en.wikipedia.org../../../1/9/2/User_talk%7E192.197.71.189.html"