User talk:192.104.181.229

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Image:Info-pictogram.png Attention:

This IP address, 192.104.181.229, is registered to Muhlenberg College and is shared by multiple users. Comments left on this page may be received by other users of this IP and appear to be irrelevant. Caution should be used when blocking this IP or reverting its contributions without checking. In the event of vandalism from this address, efforts will be made to contact Muhlenberg College to report abuse.

If you are an unregistered user operating from this address, note that this need not necessarily be the IP address of your machine. In many cases, it turns out to be the IP address of a proxy server that communicates between your browser and the Wikimedia servers. Such proxies are shared among a huge number of users compared to the number of persons using your particular machine. If you are frustrated by irrelevant comments appearing here, you can avoid them by creating an account for yourself.

Please acquaint yourself with the three-revert rule. You're coming very close to breaking it at CCHR. -- Antaeus Feldspar 23:54, 14 Apr 2005 (UTC)

Stop claiming in the Citizens Commission on Human Rights article that there is no biuological proof for psychiatry. That's an extremely biased point of view and violates Wikipedia policy. Five or more different editors have now all changed your edit when you make it, meaning that the issue has effectively been voted on and decided with overwhelming consensus. Wikipedia policy also says that consensus of active editors is a standard way of resolving disputes. If you do not respect the policies and standards of the Wikipedia website, then you should not be making changes to it. DreamGuy 21:25, Apr 19, 2005 (UTC)

You have been clocked from editing Wikipedia for 24 hours, for your repeated violation of the 3RR --nixie 07:07, 20 Apr 2005 (UTC)

Contents

[edit] Citizens Commission on Human Rights

I'm new to this debate, but the statement of doctrine as it relates to psychiatry does not appear to be biased. Please explain your position with sources demonstrating that this is not part of doctrine on the article talk page if you're going to edit the statement out. --Chiacomo (talk) 02:58, 10 Jun 2005 (UTC)

Any doctrine is beyond the point. I've been explaining the reasoning behind the CCHR, in an attempt to make the page a little more balanced. However everyone seems to be ignoring my reasoning claiming it's biased or false, when in fact they cannot supply contrary proof.

Please do not remove warnings from your talk page or replace them with offensive content. Blanking your talk page will not remove the warnings from the page history. If you continue to blank your talk page, you will lose your privilege of editing your talk page. Thanks. --Rory096 04:42, 1 May 2006 (UTC)

This is your last warning. Removing warnings from your talk page is considered vandalism. You will be blocked from editing Wikipedia and your talk page will be protected from editing if you do it again. The difference is that you're removing warnings, while Antaeus is removing an incivil comment that you added to a conversation having nothing to do with you. --Rory096 05:29, 1 May 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Blanking of this talk page

To the editor(s) who write(s) from this IP address— Please don't blank this talk page.

For one thing, several editors may share the same IP address, and blanking this page may mean that the intended recipients of messages do not receive them. For another, the administrators of this site may from time to time use this page to communicate regarding issues associated with management of this IP address.

If you would like to have your own username and talk page, feel free to sign up for a unique username. (Click on the 'log in' page up in the top right corner of the screen and follow the directions. It's quick and painless; I promise.) TenOfAllTrades(talk) 16:19, 1 May 2006 (UTC)

Please don't blank this talk page again. If necessary, I will protect this page from editing. TenOfAllTrades(talk) 01:37, 3 May 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Block

Your editing privileges have been suspended for 24 hours for continued harrassment of Antaeus Feldspar and blanking of this anon IP page following repeated warnings.

If you continue to blank this page or harrass other editors, successively longer blocks will be applied. TenOfAllTrades(talk) 02:41, 3 May 2006 (UTC)

Your recent edit to Apocalypse (comics) was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to recognize and repair vandalism to Wikipedia articles. If the bot reverted a legitimate edit, please accept our apologies – if you bring it to the attention of the bot's owner, we may be able to improve its behavior. Click here for frequently asked questions about the bot and this warning. // Tawkerbot2 05:52, 4 May 2006 (UTC)

[edit] August 2006

It might not have been your intention, but you recently removed content from Lenape. Please be careful not to remove content from Wikipedia without a valid reason, which you should specify in the edit summary or on the article's talk page. Thank you. Kafziel 20:43, 23 August 2006 (UTC)

[edit] November 2006

Please do not add nonsense to Wikipedia. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. IrishGuy talk 21:36, 8 November 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Your edit to Blue raspberry

Your recent edit to Blue raspberry (diff) was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to recognize and repair vandalism to Wikipedia articles. If the bot reverted a legitimate edit, please accept my humble creator's apologies – if you bring it to the attention of the bot's owner, we may be able to improve its behavior. Click here for frequently asked questions about the bot and this warning. // AntiVandalBot 03:02, 30 November 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Your edit to Ghost Rider (film)

Do you have a citation for the mention that Cage had to get his tattoo digitally removed? I'd like to verify that information. —Erik (talk • contrib) - 16:02, 30 January 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Your edit to Bench Press world records

Your recent edit to Bench Press world records (diff) was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to recognize and repair vandalism to Wikipedia articles. If the bot reverted a legitimate edit, please accept my humble creator's apologies – if you bring it to the attention of the bot's owner, we may be able to improve its behavior. Click here for frequently asked questions about the bot and this warning. // MartinBot 05:53, 19 March 2007 (UTC)


[edit] March 2007

Please refrain from making test edits in Wikipedia articles, such as those you made to Déjà vu, even if your ultimate intention is to revert them. If you would like to experiment again, please use the sandbox. Thank you. —dgiestc 06:54, 21 March 2007 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, please ignore this notice
Retrieved from "http://en.wikipedia.org../../../1/9/2/User_talk%7E192.104.181.229.html"