Talk:1795 in archaeology

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

[edit] Speedy del nomination

Sure enough, a good number of these [[year in archaeology]] pages are underpopulated, but it does form part of an overall scheme which has withstood a couple of deletion nominations in the past (cf. List of years in archaeology and its talk pg). Therefore I don't think it's appropriate for a speedy del nomination (it's not completely empty), particularly in isolation from all of the other years in archaeology pages. In a way it's not all that different from a one- or two-line stub, of which very many exist around here without the threat of being deleted as not presently useful. The page certainly has the potential to serve a useful and encyclopaedic purpose, and there's scope for expansion here awaiting someone's action to do so. IMO it should be allowed to remain, unless some different consensus can be reached on the overall scheme via Afd.--cjllw | TALK 12:20, 13 February 2007 (UTC)