1783 English cricket season

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

In the 1783 English cricket season, the Whitehall Evening Post reported on Tues 8 July that "the 3rd Duke of Dorset’s cricketing establishment, exclusive of any betting or consequential entertainment, is said to exceed £1000 a year". A colossal sum at the time.

Several aristocratic cricketers like Richmond, Dorset and Sir Horatio Mann had their portraits painted, but you would not expect to find a portrait of Lumpy. If anyone deserved to have his portrait painted it was the master bowler himself and apparently this was the year it was done. The famous portrait is at Knole House, seat of the Duke of Dorset in Sevenoaks.

1 Matches
2 Leading batsmen
3 Leading bowlers
4 Leading fielders
5 Main Sources

[edit] Matches

Date	Match Title	Venue	Source	Result
20 & 21 May (Tu-W)	Odiham v Maidenhead	Odiham Down	FL18	Odiham won
Apparently this match was preceded by the conclusion of one left over from last season and that must have been the one due to start at Odiham Down on Mon 7 October 1782.
25-26 June (W-Th)	Duke of Dorset v Sir H Mann	Sevenoaks Vine	SB56	Mann's XI won by 2 wkts
Duke of Dorset’s XI 97 (W Bowra 28, Mr G Louch 24; – Martin 5w) & 135 (W Bedster 43, W Bullen 31; – Martin 2w, R Clifford 2w); Sir Horace Mann’s XI 147 (T Pattenden 52, J Aylward 26; J Boorman 2w) & 86-8 (J Aylward 25; W Bullen 3w) Mr Haygarth recorded that: "Stevens was not to bowl, by agreement. This being the case, he could not have been much use as a given man, as he was no batsman". The Duke of Dorset’s team included six players whose name began with B.
8-9 July (Tu-W)	Hampshire v Kent	Windmill Down	SB57	tied
Hampshire 140 (T Taylor 51, T Sueter 42; W Bullen 4w) & 62 (W Bullen 2w); Kent 111 (W Brazier 27; E Stevens 2w, D Harris 2w, R Francis 2w) & 91 (J Aylward 27; E Stevens 2w) This is the first tied match for which a detailed scorecard has survived. There are earlier tied matches of which we have few details. According to Arthur Haygarth: "Kent actually won the match. It was discovered afterwards that Pratt, the scorer, whose method (which was the usual one at that time) was to cut a notch on a stick for every run, and to cut every tenth notch longer, in order to count the whole more expeditiously, had, by mistake, marked in one place the eleventh notch instead of the tenth. The stick was afterwards produced; but the other scorer could not or would not produce his. The play was excellent on both sides, and the game was saved by Clifford’s attention. Both sides were alternatively the favourites, and high odds laid". Mr Haygarth found a lot of conflicting information in his sources.
17 July (Th)	Maidenhead v Odiham	Oldfield Bray	FL18	Odiham won by 9 wkts
Reported by the Reading Mercury on Mon 21 July. WDC also has this match but incorrectly dates it as Thurs 31 July.
24 July (Th)	Strood v Dartford	Strood	WDC	Dartford won by 1 run
Any Dartford match in C18 has historical interest but the club seems to have lost its lustre by 1783. Even so, this must have been a very exciting game at the end.
6-9 Aug (W-S)	Kent v Hampshire	Bishopsbourne Paddock	SB58	Hampshire won by 85 runs
Hampshire 160 (John Small 52, J Bayley 25; W Bullen 3w, R Clifford 3w) & 192 (T Taylor 66, T Sueter 36, R A Veck 31, R Nyren 25; W Bullen 2w); Kent 204 (J Ring 82, W Bedster 61; E Stevens 5w) & 63 (W Bullen 23; D Harris 2w)
26-29 Aug (Tu-F)	Hampshire v All-England	Windmill Down	SB59	drawn (rain)
All-England 218 (W Brazier 79, F Booker 25, W Yalden 22; E Stevens 3w, D Harris 2w) & 133 (J Ring 27; D Harris 2w); Hampshire 217 (John Small 78, T Sueter 53, R Nyren 22; W Brazier 3w, W Bullen 2w) & 63-5 (N Mann 32, R A Veck 24; W Brazier 2w) This is the first instance among matches with recorded scores of a draw. Hardly surprisingly, it was due to persistent rain! Arthur Haygarth says: "This match was put off, on account of bad weather, and never resumed".
1 Sept (M)	Melton Mowbray v Nottingham	Melton Mowbray	FL18	Nottingham won by 4 wkts
The scorecard for this game is bizarre. All 11 players in the Melton first innings were out! In the Nottingham second innings, six are shown as out including one who was "out of ground" (so presumably stumped given that "run out" is used elsewhere in the card) but there is only one shown as "last man" and he didn’t score!
5-6 Sept (F-S)	Chertsey v Berkshire	Laleham Burway	WDC	Berkshire won by 10 wkts
Chertsey 145 (W Bedster 44, H Attfield 41, W Yalden 23) & 62 (H Attfield 18); Berkshire 179 (T Taylor 93, Mr G T Boult 31) & 30-0 This was reported as: "A match of cricket, between the Berkshire Club, with Taylor of Hampshire, and Chertsey, with Bedster and Lambert, which was decided in favour of the Berkshire Club, by 2 runs and 10 wickets to go down". Although both Chertsey and Berkshire have been recognised as participants in major matches at other times, only 7 or 8 recognised players were involved in this game and its status is marginal. Five of the Berkshire players played for Maidenhead v Chertsey in 1780 (see above).
11 Sept (Th)	Nottingham v Melton Mowbray	Nottingham	FL18	Nottingham won by 13 runs
Thurs 11 September. The Nottingham Journal mentions "a Close near Trent Bridge" as the venue for the return match between Melton Mowbray and Nottingham. This was over 60 years before William Clarke opened the Trent Bridge Cricket Ground! The report goes on to say that the Nottingham players uniformly dressed in green jackets and the Melton players in white jackets. The Nottingham games against Melton Mowbray are historically interesting reports of the old Nottingham Club that ultimately evolved into Nottinghamshire CCC.

[edit] Leading batsmen

Note that many scorecards in the 18th century are unknown or have missing details and so it is impossible to provide a complete analysis of batting performances: e.g., the missing not outs prevent computation of batting averages. The "runs scored" are in fact the runs known.

runs	player
157	John Small
147	James Aylward
144	William Bedster
141	Thomas Taylor
137	William Brazier
134	Tom Sueter
131	Joey Ring
100	William Bullen
95	Thomas Pattenden

[edit] Leading bowlers

Note that the wickets credited to an 18th century bowler were only those where he bowled the batsman out. The bowler was not credited with the wickets of batsmen who were caught out, even if it was "caught and bowled". In addition, the runs conceded by each bowler were not recorded so no analyses or averages can be computed.

wkts	player
18	William Bullen
14	Edward "Lumpy" Stevens
10	David Harris
7	William Brazier
7	Robert Clifford
7	Martin
3	Richard Francis

[edit] Leading fielders

Note that many scorecards in the 18th century are unknown or have missing details and so the totals are of the known catches and stumpings only. Stumpings were not always recorded as such and sometimes the name of the wicket-keeper was not given. Generally, a catch was given the same status as "bowled" with credit being awarded to the fielder only and not the bowler. There is never a record of "caught and bowled"the bowler would be credited with the catch, not with the wicket.