User talk:170.35.224.63

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Contents

[edit] Re: Tulsa

Okay; thanks for the note. I'm glad to hear the issue has been resolved. Happy editing, -- Hadal 16:48, 21 Apr 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Sources for P.K. Sam

Hello, good work on P.K. Sam, and thanks for the contribution. However, you forgot to add any references to the article. Keeping Wikipedia accurate and verifiable is very important, and there is currently a push to encourage editors to cite the sources they used when adding content. What websites, books, or other places did you learn the information that you added to P.K. Sam? Would it be possible for you to mention them in the article? Thank you very much. - SimonP 05:33, 4 December 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Rice burner

Thank for your interest in this article, however, there has been much work in keeping the article neutral and maintain community consensus. Therefore I advise you to make edits more incrementally and be wary of blanking sections. Thanks for your interest though, we always need good editors for that article. -Drdisque 22:50, 3 February 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Banning

I am refering you to be banned because you vandalised Nextell by changing to Sextel


The same person seems to be repeatedly vandalizing The Pride of Broken Arrow as well. Ash Lux 22:03, 26 May 2006 (UTC)

[edit] WARNING

Welcome to Wikipedia. We invite everyone to contribute constructively to our encyclopedia. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing. However, unconstructive edits, such as those you made to The Pride of Broken Arrow, are considered vandalism. If you continue in this manner you may be blocked from editing without further warning. Please stop, and consider improving rather than damaging the hard work of others. Thanks. Ash Lux 22:04, 26 May 2006 (UTC)


This is your last warning. The next time you vandalize a page, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Locust43 (talkcontribs) .


Welcome to Wikipedia. We invite everyone to contribute constructively to our encyclopedia. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing. However, unconstructive edits, such as those you made to Land Run of 1889, are considered vandalism. If you continue in this manner you may be blocked from editing without further warning. Please stop, and consider improving rather than damaging the hard work of others. Thanks. Ash Lux (talk | Contribs) 15:10, 30 May 2006 (UTC)


[edit] July, 2006

This is your last warning. The next time you vandalize a page, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. --Claygate 02:50, 13 July 2006 (UTC)

Please refrain from adding nonsense to Wikipedia, as you did to International Wireless Care. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Kungfu Adam (talk) 20:01, 26 August 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Temporary block

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 7 days for vandalizing Wikipedia. If you wish to make useful contributions, you are welcome to come back after the block expires. Runcorn 21:24, 17 October 2006 (UTC)

--Runcorn 21:24, 17 October 2006 (UTC)

Please do not remove content from Wikipedia, as you did to Goatse.cx. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. A link to the edit I have reverted can be found here: link. If you believe this edit should not have been reverted, please contact me. Pcbene 00:16, 29 October 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Blocked

You have been blocked from editing Wikipedia for repeated vandalism. If or when the block expires, feel free to come back, but please make useful contributions instead, and refrain from vandalising or this account will face longer blocks, and action could be taken against the individual who uses it. --Konst.ableTalk 00:19, 29 October 2006 (UTC)
This is your last warning.
The next time you vandalize a page, as you did to Pimp, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. NawlinWiki 22:05, 1 November 2006 (UTC)

[edit] December 2006

Please do not add nonsense to Wikipedia, as you did to DC Shoes. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. --Liface 03:55, 11 December 2006 (UTC)

This is your last warning.
The next time you vandalize a page, as you did to Joshua Dariye, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Sagaciousuk (talk) 17:07, 16 January 2007 (UTC)

Thank you for experimenting with the page Chris Webber on Wikipedia. Your test worked, and it has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you may want to do. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. Navou banter 03:13, 18 January 2007 (UTC)


[edit] Removing math textbooks

Why are you removing math textbooks that are notable? Isn't there a rule against removing notable content from WP?? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 170.35.224.63 (talkcontribs).

Could you be more specific about what you are referring to? I intersected with you only here as far as I can tell, and there were no textbooks there. Oleg Alexandrov (talk) 03:23, 30 January 2007 (UTC)
Also, could you make an account and use an edit summary when you contribute. It is easier to communicate that way. Oleg Alexandrov (talk) 03:23, 30 January 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Mathematics education

I appreciate it that you are writing on this, but please note that your additions to Remainder, Subtraction and Multiplication algorithm were off-topic. The issues surrounding teaching subtraction and multiplication in school (and standards math vs traditional math) belong at most in one place, and referenced accordingly from other articles, rather than adding ==Elementary mathematics reform== sections to any article involving elementary mathematics.

I removed your changes to those three articles. Please do not put them back without further discussion. I would strongly encourage you to make an account and to read more about how Wikipedia works before attempting further big changes to articles. If you have questions, I'd appreciate it if you contact me on my talk page (after making an account, as it is hard to chase a person based on variable IP address). Thanks. Oleg Alexandrov (talk) 03:18, 31 January 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Overlake Church

You are more than welcome to add information to the article, provided it is attributed to a reliable source. My stubbing is in absolutely no way a final action. I stubbed the page for a variety of reason. Firstly, it was unsourced and concerned several living people, possibly running afoul of the policy on biographies of living persons. (Note that the policy applies to any information about living persons in any article, not just a biography about the subject.) Also, I believe the version at the time of my stubbing was giving undue weight to the scandal. Finally, I think this undue weight was attracting the vandalism, whitewashing, and whatever the opposite of whitewashing is that the article was receiving.

That said, I would more than welcome a sourced article about the church doesn't give the impression that the church is scandal-free nor that it is all scandal, all the time. I do not personally feel qualified to write such an article, but would be willing to help find sources, copyedit, and neutrality-edit such an article. Natalie 01:53, 8 March 2007 (UTC)


[edit] Skyview Junior High School

Your recent contribution(s) to Wikipedia are very much appreciated. However, you did not provide references or sources for your information. Keeping Wikipedia accurate and verifiable is very important, and as you might be aware there is currently a drive to improve the quality of Wikipedia by encouraging editors to cite the sources they used when adding content. If sources are left unreferenced, it may count as original research, which is not allowed. Can you provide in the article specific references to any books, articles, websites or other reliable sources that will allow people to verify the content in the article? You can use a citation method listed at How to cite sources. Thanks! janejellyroll 03:44, 12 March 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Page blanking

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent contribution removed content from an article. Please be more careful when editing articles and do not remove content from Wikipedia without a good reason, which should be specified in the edit summary. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you would like to experiment again, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Han Amos 23:33, 21 March 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Nonsense articles

Can I please make it clear that this is an encyclopedia, not a playground. Your pages Cruncher and Warm Springs Middle School are inappropriate, and despite repeated warnings you have continued to vandalise Wikipedia. Please take note that this is your final warning. If you continue to vandalise Wikipedia you will be either temporarily or permanently blocked from editing. --///Jrothwell (talk)///

Note: If you've not created these articles and feel these comments have been unfairly directed at you, it is because someone is vandalising Wikipedia from your IP address. I sincerely apologise for this, and would strongly recommend that you log in or create an account to avoid future warnings. Thank you. --///Jrothwell (talk)/// 21:13, 23 March 2007 (UTC)