User talk:170.20.96.116

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Attention:

This IP address, 170.20.96.116, is registered to CBS, and may be shared by multiple users. In the case of organizations using proxy servers, this IP address may in fact represent many users at many physical computers.

For this reason, a message intended for one person may be received by another and a block shared by many. If you are editing from this address and are frustrated by irrelevant messages, you can avoid them by creating an account for yourself. In some cases, you may temporarily be unable to create an account due to efforts to fight vandalism, in which case, please see here.

If you are autoblocked repeatedly, we encourage you to contact your Internet service provider or IT department and ask them to contact Wikimedia's XFF project about enabling X-Forwarded-For HTTP headers on their proxy servers so that our editing blocks will affect only the intended user.


Caution should be used when blocking this IP or reverting its contributions without checking - if a block is needed, administrators should consider using a soft block with the template {{anonblock|optional comment}} as the block reason.

Note: In the event of vandalism from this address, abuse reports may be sent to your network administrator for further investigation.
This IP has been repeatedly blocked from editing Wikipedia in response to abuse of editing privileges. Further abuse from this IP may result in an immediate block without further warning.

Contents

[edit] Warning messages

[edit] December 2005

  1. Thanks for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your test worked, and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. Thanks. Johnleemk | Talk 16:54, 11 December 2005 (UTC)
  2. RE: [1] Please stop adding nonsense to Wikipedia. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. Hall Monitor 21:40, 12 December 2005 (UTC)
  3. RE: [2] Please stop. If you continue to vandalize pages, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Hall Monitor 21:40, 12 December 2005 (UTC)
  4. This is your last warning. The next time you vandalize a page, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. --Shanel 22:16, 29 December 2005 (UTC)
    You have been temporarily blocked from editing for vandalism of Wikipedia. If you wish to make useful contributions, you may come back after the block expires.--Shanel 22:18, 29 December 2005 (UTC)

[edit] January 2006

  1. Thanks for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your test worked, and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. Thanks. Liamdaly620 22:28, 23 January 2006 (UTC)

[edit] W&M edits

If you insist on repeatedly cleansing portions of the W&M pages, please explain the changes on the W&M talk page.

Again, "If you insist on repeatedly cleansing portions of the W&M pages, please explain the changes on the W&M talk page."

Again, "Again, "If you insist on repeatedly cleansing portions of the W&M pages, please explain the changes on the W&M talk page.""

Similar behavior repeated on September 14th and reverted pending discussion.

Again, "Again, "Again, "If you insist on repeatedly cleansing portions of the W&M pages, please explain the changes on the W&M talk page.""" Cka3n 02:47, 12 December 2006 (UTC)

You recently changed the W&M page to read:

In 2003, The Wall Street Journal published the results of a survey of the alma maters of entering students at the nation's elite business, medical and law schools (e.g., Wharton Business School, Yale Law School, Harvard Medical School). Among public colleges, William and Mary placed 2nd in Virginia and 7th seventh among all public colleges for elite graduate placement (82nd in an overall comparison of all private and public university raw numbers of elite placements; in short, not correcting for class size). [3][4]

Again, "Again, "Again, "Again, "If you insist on repeatedly cleansing portions of the W&M pages, please explain the changes on the W&M talk page.""""

This section has been addressed on the [talk page]. In particular, 1) the schools you would like to add are not mentioned by the WSJ links, 2) the ranking does not address public colleges (and while a state college may be a public college in virginia, that might not be the case in, e.g., Maryland or New York), and 3) the rankings do correct for class size (see #2 on the state school list and #5 on the overall list). Cka3n 20:09, 14 December 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Eric the Midget

Please do not remove tags on the Eric the Midget article without first addressing the problem. Use the talk page for any questions. --Bill.matthews 00:33, 4 October 2006 (UTC)

Thank you for experimenting with the page Jeff Stryker on Wikipedia. Your test worked, and it has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. A link to the edit I have reverted can be found here: link. If you believe this edit should not have been reverted, please contact me. Nilfanion (talk) 19:51, 6 October 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Your edit to KIOZ

Your recent edit to KIOZ (diff) was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to recognize and repair vandalism to Wikipedia articles. If the bot reverted a legitimate edit, please accept my humble creator's apologies – if you bring it to the attention of the bot's owner, we may be able to improve its behavior. Click here for frequently asked questions about the bot and this warning. // AntiVandalBot 20:40, 10 December 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Please stop vandalizing the Stryker page

If you disagree with citations or information in them, please post argument to the talk page before deleting. -- Craigtalbert 02:19, 13 December 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Regarding "Stryker's" real name appearing on Wikipedia

"Stryker's" real name appears on the following pages outside of wikipedia (and probably more).

I don't believe removing it from Wikipedia makes a difference. Please go through the appropriate channels (wikipedia administrators) if you feel differently. -- Craigtalbert 08:41, 14 December 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Your edits to December 12

Please do not add yourself or anyone else without a Wikipedia article to the Wikicalendar pages. To have an article, a person must meet the criteria outlined in WP:BIO. Thank you. Fabricationary 18:20, 26 December 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Your edit to David Belle

Your recent edit to David Belle (diff) was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to recognize and repair vandalism to Wikipedia articles. If the bot reverted a legitimate edit, please accept my humble creator's apologies – if you bring it to the attention of the bot's owner, we may be able to improve its behavior. Click here for frequently asked questions about the bot and this warning. // AntiVandalBot 22:41, 28 December 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Jan 27, 07

Please do not add nonsense to Wikipedia. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. Bubba73 (talk), 04:45, 27 January 2007 (UTC)

[edit] March 2007

Please stop. If you continue to vandalise Wikipedia, as you did to Pauly Shore, you will be blocked from editing. -Mschel 20:53, 6 March 2007 (UTC)

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize pages, as you did to CKLW (AM), you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. BrianGV 01:32, 16 March 2007 (UTC)

Please do not add inappropriate external links to Wikipedia, as you did to Motorola RAZR V3. Wikipedia is not a mere directory of links, nor should it be used for advertising or promotion. Inappropriate links include (but are not limited to) links to personal web sites, links to web sites with which you are affiliated, and links that attract visitors to a web site or promote a product. See the external links guideline and spam policy for further explanations. Since Wikipedia uses nofollow tags, external links do not alter search engine rankings. If you feel the link should be added to the article, then please discuss it on the article's talk page before reinserting it. See the welcome page to learn more about Wikipedia. Thank you. --ImmortalGoddezz 02:32, 21 March 2007 (UTC)

Please stop adding inappropriate external links to Wikipedia, as you did to Motorola RAZR V3. It is considered spamming and Wikipedia is not a vehicle for advertising or promotion. Since Wikipedia uses nofollow tags, additions of links to Wikipedia will not alter search engine rankings. If you continue spamming, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. --ImmortalGoddezz 02:40, 21 March 2007 (UTC)

This is your last warning. The next time you insert a spam link, as you did to Motorola RAZR V3, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Persistent spammers may have their websites blacklisted as well, preventing anyone from linking to them from any site that uses the MediaWiki spam blacklist, which includes all of Wikimedia and Wikipedia. --ImmortalGoddezz 02:48, 21 March 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Reply

I've replied to your query on on my talk page. Picaroon 19:35, 27 March 2007 (UTC)