User talk:168.212.147.254

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

School IP address Attention:

This IP address, 168.212.147.254, is registered to Washington School Information Processing Cooperative and may be shared by multiple users of an educational institution. In the case of institutions using proxy servers, this IP address may in fact represent many users at many physical computers.

For this reason a message intended for one person may be received by another. Similarly an innocent user may get blocked for another user's vandalism. If you are editing from this address and are frustrated by irrelevant messages, you can avoid them by creating an account for yourself. In some cases you may temporarily be unable to create an account due to efforts to fight vandalism, in which case please read our advice on this situation.

Caution should be used when blocking this IP or reverting its contributions without checking - if a block is needed, administrators should consider a soft block with the template {{schoolblock|optional comment}} as the block reason.

Note: In the event of persistent vandalism, anonymous editing from this IP address may be disabled for up to 6 months at a time while abuse reports may be forwarded to your school administration for investigation in case of long-term abuse by registered users.

i like cheese

Welcome to Wikipedia. We invite everyone to contribute constructively to our encyclopedia. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing. However, unconstructive edits are considered vandalism. If you continue in this manner you may be blocked from editing without further warning. Please stop, and consider improving rather than damaging the work of others. Thank you. Misza13 21:35, 20 November 2006 (UTC)

Contents

[edit] Your edit to Spam (electronic)

Your recent edit to Spam (electronic) (diff) was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to recognize and repair vandalism to Wikipedia articles. If the bot reverted a legitimate edit, please accept my humble creator's apologies – if you bring it to the attention of the bot's owner, we may be able to improve its behavior. Click here for frequently asked questions about the bot and this warning. // AntiVandalBot 17:16, 20 December 2006 (UTC)

Please do not add nonsense to Wikipedia, as you did to Eldfell. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. A link to the edit I have reverted can be found here: link. If you believe this edit should not have been reverted, please contact me. Húsönd 22:08, 19 January 2007 (UTC)

Please stop. If you continue to vandalise Wikipedia, as you did to To Kill a Mockingbird, you will be blocked. A link to the edit I have reverted can be found here: link. If you believe this edit should not have been reverted, please contact me. Happy Editing by Snowolf(talk)CONCOI on 19:41, 26 February 2007 (UTC)

This is your last warning.
The next time you vandalize a page, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. ~ Arjun 19:48, 26 February 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Vandalism warning

Please do not remove content from Wikipedia. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Artaxiad 19:08, 27 February 2007 (UTC)

[edit] February 2007

Please stop. If you continue to delete or blank page contents or templates from Wikipedia, as you did to Biofuel, you will be blocked. Luis1972 (Talk • My Contribs) 19:16, 27 February 2007 (UTC)


[edit] February 2007

This is your last warning. The next time you vandalise Wikipedia, as you did to Wind power, you will be blocked from editing. Leafyplant 19:16, 27 February 2007 (UTC)

[edit] A Word

I've been looking at what you're doing.

What you are doing, my friends, is wrong. To recount, all of you little Washington School Children have been taking articles, most likely those which your friends will see when they do research, and vandalising them. Spreading your opinions, such as 'Mrs Hsu is the worst English Teacher ever' on them.

Now, I don't think you may have noticed, kids, but Wikipedia is not your School. Nor is it a Forum. It may purely have been your bad judgement; your school may be painted white and blue, or you may visit an Internet forum that uses a similar template. But the fact is, Wikipedia is not a place for venting your opinions. Wikipedia is meant to be something that everyone will use.

And look at what you've been doing. I notice you most prominently enjoy wiping out large parts of 'To Kill a Mockingbird', abusing the book, the characters, or your English Teacher. You may have an opinion; you may, due to circumstances beyond your control, be unable to actually grasp the meaning of the book; this makes no difference. The best thing about having an opinion is keeping it to yourself; that way, it doesn't hurt anyone, and no-one hurts you with theirs.

I wonder if you've heard of the Rosie O' Donnell 'Ching-Chong' incident? The one where she said on Live Television that Chinese Newscasters dialogue basically consisted of 'Ching-Chong?' When Rosie did that, she was making not only herself look ignorant and stupid, but the whole of America, especially the Audience who laughed. In making slurs against 'To Kill a Mockingbird', perhaps the greatest piece of Fiction that will ever come out of America, you are making not only yourself but your entire school look as if they can't read a book without believing the characetrs to be Homosexuals, and also that they think being a Homosexual is wrong. I'm betting that if you asked people, their honest opinion is that it isn't.

And since when is Atticus Gay? Where does it say that? Have oyu read the book? Do you think the character shows signs of being a Homosexual? It seems that he very much isn't; it looks an awful lot to me like he's trying very hard to raise two children, and help people as a Lawyer. If, indeed, you are using the word 'Gay' to mean 'Stupid' - which, of course, is not what the word 'Gay' means - then I think you haven't read the book at all. Do you have any right to say 'this book is gay' when you haven't even read it? I really think you don't.

But, hey, maybe I'm wrong; maybe you are intelligent. Maybe you can grasp the concept of the book. Why don' you just send me your own ideas in an intelligent way, Hm? As you're so smart. maybe, if you don't like this book so much, you should send me a sample of your own writing, and see if it matches up. That is, presuming you do write anything instead of sitting in front of a screen when you get home.

Then, we could see how you measure up. I suppose that writing a story about racial prejudice and injustice isn't hard to do in America, most especially Washington, but I bet, given the time, one of you kind people could try to write something. And then we'd compare it to Harper Lee's own work.

But, no, I can get the impression form your numerous edits that you don't really like doing work. So...maybe...you could say sorry. You'll notice, when you go to the Article for 'To Kill a Mockingbird', there is a 'Talk' page. Kids, there is still room for forgiveness! If you write a nice apology, tell us why you did those terrible things, everything would be fine. But, right now, you are soiling the image of both your school, your conutry, and your people. And the people at the other end don't like it that much.

Say sorry.

Please. SaliereTheFish 11:22, 28 February 2007 (UTC)

You have been temporarily blocked from editing Wikipedia as a result of your disruptive edits. You are free to make constructive edits after the block has expired, but please note that vandalism (including page blanking or addition of random text), spam, deliberate misinformation, privacy violations, personal attacks; and repeated, blatant violations of our neutral point of view policy will not be tolerated.--Gamaliel 19:11, 1 March 2007 (UTC)

[edit] March 2007

Please do not add unhelpful and non-constructive information to Wikipedia, as you did to Monera. Your edits could be considered vandalism, and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Autocracy 21:20, 8 March 2007 (UTC)

Your recent edit to Color blindness (diff) was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to recognize and repair vandalism to Wikipedia articles. If the bot reverted a legitimate edit, please accept my humble creator's apologies – if you bring it to the attention of the bot's owner, we may be able to improve its behavior. Click here for frequently asked questions about the bot and this warning. // AntiVandalBot 19:47, 21 March 2007 (UTC)

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Morse v. Frederick, you will be blocked from editing. --Ronz 19:51, 21 March 2007 (UTC)

You have been temporarily blocked from editing Wikipedia as a result of your disruptive edits. You are free to make constructive edits after the block has expired, but please note that vandalism (including page blanking or addition of random text), spam, deliberate misinformation, privacy violations, personal attacks; and repeated, blatant violations of our neutral point of view policy will not be tolerated. —Wknight94 (talk) 21:49, 22 March 2007 (UTC)

Retrieved from "http://en.wikipedia.org../../../1/6/8/User_talk%7E168.212.147.254.html"