Talk:15th Marine Expeditionary Unit

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Good articles 15th Marine Expeditionary Unit has been listed as a good article under the good-article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do.
If it no longer meets these criteria, you can delist it, or ask for a review.

15th Marine Expeditionary Unit is was featured on the United States Marine Corps portal as the Selected article. (9 October - 7 November 2006)

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the 15th Marine Expeditionary Unit article.
This is not a forum for general discussion about the article's subject.

Article policies
This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks.
Good article GA This article has been rated as GA-Class on the quality scale.

Contents

[edit] Article

A few redlinks need fixing. Well written. Oldwildbill 14:35, 16 July 2006 (UTC)

[edit] good article nom

this article is well organized but it could use more references. it has no inline references nor "citation" sections.

Justforasecond 15:43, 4 August 2006 (UTC)

I dropped by to review this article. It shows a lot of promise, but needs references. See 2nd Battalion 9th Marines for an example of a good article on a military unit to see what I mean. --CTSWyneken(talk) 13:04, 5 August 2006 (UTC)‎

  • Inline refs have been added. — ERcheck (talk) 20:09, 5 August 2006 (UTC)
It's looking good. When I have a bit of time, I'll comment a bit more. It is probably close, if not ready, to promote from the quick once over I've done. --CTSWyneken(talk) 23:39, 6 August 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Unit awards

Rough Draft...

[edit] Unit awards

[edit] GA Passed

Thank you for working to add the references. It is now a very nicely done article, worthy of the GA status. If you decide to pursue FA status, may I suggest requesting a peer review next? Congratulations! --CTSWyneken(talk) 12:58, 7 August 2006 (UTC)

  • Thank you for the review and promotion. — ERcheck (talk) 03:01, 8 August 2006 (UTC)