User talk:152.163.100.72

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

You have new messages (last change).

This IP address is that of an AOL web proxy which now sends X-Forwarded-For headers to the Wikimedia Foundation. No further edits should originate from this IP address. For more information, please see Wikipedia:AOL.

If you are an AOL user editing from this IP address, please email an administrator to have the problem corrected. Note that this IP address has been indefinitely blocked, so you will not be able to edit from this address.

It is suspected that this user might be a sock puppet or impersonator of Mykungfu.
Please refer to contributions for evidence. See block log and current autoblocks.


Contents

[edit] Welcome

Welcome!

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for your contributions.

Currently, you are editing without a username. You can continue to do so, as you are not required to log in to Wikipedia to read and edit articles; however, logging in will result in a username being shown instead of your IP address (yours is 152.163.100.72). Logging in does not require any personal details. There are many other benefits for logging in to Wikipedia. For now, if you are stuck, you can type {{helpme}} on this page and an experienced Wikipedian will be around to answer any questions you may have.

Please note these points:

  • Please respect others' copyrights; do not copy and paste the contents from webpages directly.
  • Please use a neutral point of view when editing articles; this is possibly the most important Wikipedia policy.
  • If you are testing, please use the Sandbox to do so.
  • Do not add unreasonable contents into any articles, such as: copyrighted text, advertisement messages, and text that is not related to an article's subject. Both adding such unreasonable information and editing articles maliciously are considered vandalism.

The Wikipedia Tutorial is a good place to start learning about Wikipedia. If you have any questions, ask me on my Talk page. I will answer your questions as far as I can! Thank you again for contributing to Wikipedia. Antonrojo 19:54, 30 April 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Racism

Please stop adding nonsense to Wikipedia. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. Owen× ☎ 02:53, 28 October 2005 (UTC)

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize pages, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Doc ask? 22:21, 9 November 2005 (UTC)

This is your last warning. The next time you vandalize a page, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. -Greg Asche (talk) 23:02, 10 November 2005 (UTC)

I was not vandalizing. I should be free to put down comments about Joel. That's why you have the discussion page for him. I said he's gay and people misinterpret it for vandalizing.

No, the discussion page is for discussing article contributions and improving the article according to Wikipedia policies and guidelines. --Viriditas 11:03, 21 November 2005 (UTC)

= = '''''TURDFERGUSON''''' = =

[edit] more notices

Thanks for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your test worked, and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. Thanks. JtkieferT | C | @ ---- 05:38, 24 November 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Webcam

Please do not add commercial links — or links to your own private websites — to Wikipedia. Wikipedia is not a vehicle for advertising or a mere collection of external links. See the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. Thanks. --JiFish(Talk/Contrib) 12:34, 30 November 2005 (UTC)

[edit] December 2005

Thanks for experimenting with the page Euclid on Wikipedia. Your test worked, and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. Thanks. The Hooded Man 22:52, 1 December 2005 (UTC)

[edit] thanks for the heads up

Thank you for the heads up. --Woohookitty(cat scratches) 08:03, 27 December 2005 (UTC)

Please stop blanking pages or adding nonsense to Wikipedia. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. --Winter 01:01, 4 January 2006 (UTC)

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize pages, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Snargle 05:02, 3 February 2006 (UTC)


This is your last warning. The next time you vandalize a page, as you did to Brian Kendrick, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Winter (talk ¦ ✉) 02:02, 6 February 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Vandalism

Please stop vandalising wikipedia and consider this a a warning for the Atlantic Modal Haplotype page.

This is your last warning. The next time you vandalize a page, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Sandwich Eater 15:36, 12 February 2006 (UTC)

This is your last warning. The next time you vandalize a page, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia.

Welcome to Wikipedia. We invite everyone to contribute constructively to our encyclopedia. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing. However, unconstructive edits, such as those you made to Flag of Mexico, are considered vandalism. If you continue in this manner you may be blocked from editing without further warning. Please stop, and consider improving rather than damaging the hard work of others. Thanks. (ESkog)(Talk) 00:57, 8 March 2006 (UTC)

You have been temporarily blocked from editing for vandalism of Wikipedia. If you wish to make useful contributions, you may do so after the block expires.

RexNL 16:54, 12 March 2006 (UTC)

[edit] March 13th, 2006

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize pages, as you did to Brooke Hogan, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. --Cymsdale 00:47, 14 March 2006 (UTC)

[edit] March 20th, 2006

This is your last warning. The next time you vandalize a page, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Antonrojo 03:25, 20 March 2006 (UTC)

[edit] April 2nd edits

Please be careful not to remove content from Wikipedia without a valid reason, which you should specify in the edit summary or on the article's talk page. Thank you. --Ixfd64 03:24, 2 April 2006 (UTC)

Your recent edit to Moros i cristians was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to recognize and repair vandalism to Wikipedia articles. If the bot reverted a legitimate edit, please accept our apologies – if you bring it to the attention of the bot's owner, we may be able to improve its behavior. // Tawkerbot2 05:56, 4 April 2006 (UTC)

[edit] April 10th edits

Please do not add nonsense to Wikipedia. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. Asarelah 02:56, 11 April 2006 (UTC)

Please refrain from removing content from Wikipedia, as you did to Atkins Nutritional Approach. It is considered vandalism. If you want to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. - Dakota ~ ° 04:05, 12 April 2006 (UTC)

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize pages, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. RexNL 16:40, 16 April 2006 (UTC)

This is your last warning. The next time you vandalize a page, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. RexNL 16:40, 16 April 2006 (UTC)

This is your last warning for editing Laura Bush. The next time you vandalize a page, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. // Tawkerbot2 16:40, 16 April 2006 (UTC)

You have been temporarily blocked from editing for vandalism of Wikipedia. If you wish to make useful contributions, you may do so after the block expires.

RexNL 16:41, 16 April 2006 (UTC)

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize pages, as you did to Hokum, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. A link to the edit I have reverted can be found here: link. If you believe this edit should not have been reverted, please contact me. whipsandchains 05:41, 6 May 2006 (UTC)

Please refrain from adding nonsense to Wikipedia, as you did to Muhammad's marriages. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. A link to the edit I have reverted can be found here: link. If you believe this edit should not have been reverted, please contact me. Admrb♉ltz (t • c • log) 05:53, 9 May 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Muhammad's marriages

You have reverted twice to YOUR version. Please stop. You are giving no references to support your claim that Maria was a virgin. There is no reference to her virginity in Ibn Ishaq or Tabari. In both books, she is described as a "slave girl". She may have been victimized by a string of owners for all we know. Zora 06:40, 9 May 2006 (UTC)

Please Don't Vandalize (2nd Warning).

This message is concerning the article User:Master of Puppets. Please stop adding nonsense or blanking articles on Wikipedia. This will be considered vandalism if it continues. Please use the sandbox for any further testing.

— nathanrdotcom (Got something to say? Say it.) 05:48, 11 May 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Your edit to Kanye West

Your recent edit to Kanye West was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to recognize and repair vandalism to Wikipedia articles. If the bot reverted a legitimate edit, please accept my humble creator's apologies – if you bring it to the attention of the bot's owner, we may be able to improve its behavior. Click here for frequently asked questions about the bot and this warning. // Tawkerbot2 00:26, 18 May 2006 (UTC)

Please refrain from adding nonsense to Wikipedia, as you did to Warriors of Virtue. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. A link to the edit I have reverted can be found here: link. If you believe this edit should not have been reverted, please contact me. Olorin28 22:16, 18 May 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Your edit to Slurve

Your recent edit to Slurve was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to recognize and repair [[Wikiped

This is the only warning you will receive. Your recent vandalism has shown you to be intent on doing harm to Wikipedia. The next time you vandalize a page, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. --digital_me(TalkˑContribs) 17:19, 13 June 2006 (UTC)

Please refrain from adding nonsense to Wikipedia, as you did to User talk:Drini. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. A link to the edit I have reverted can be found here: link. If you believe this edit should not have been reverted, please contact me. ☆TBC☆ (aka Tree Biting Conspiracy) 20:32, 16 June 2006 (UTC)

Thank you for experimenting with the page Fidel Castro on Wikipedia. Your test worked, and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. A link to the edit I have reverted can be found here: link. If you believe this edit should not have been reverted, please contact me. —D-Rock 17:57, 19 June 2006 (UTC)

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize pages, as you did to Leroy S. Starrett, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. A link to the edit I have reverted can be found here: link. If you believe this edit should not have been reverted, please contact me. негіднийлють (Reply|Spam Me!*|RfS) 20:47, 19 June 2006 (UTC)

This is your last warning. The next time you vandalize a page, as you did to Renaldo Balkman, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. A link to the edit I have reverted can be found here: link. If you believe this edit should not have been reverted, please contact me. TBCTaLk?!? 03:34, 29 June 2006 (UTC)

This is your last warning. The next time you vandalize a page, as you did to Renaldo Balkman, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. A link to the edit I have reverted can be found here: link. If you believe this edit should not have been reverted, please contact me. TBCTaLk?!? 03:41, 29 June 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Your edit to Apple

Your recent edit to Apple (diff) was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to recognize and repair vandalism to Wikipedia articles. If the bot reverted a legitimate edit, please accept my humble creator's apologies – if you bring it to the attention of the bot's owner, we may be able to improve its behavior. Click here for frequently asked questions about the bot and this warning. // Tawkerbot2 03:34, 3 July 2006 (UTC)

This is your last warning. The next time you vandalize a page, as you did to Tom Cruise, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. -- — xaosflux Talk 02:36, 6 July 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Blocked

You have been temporarily blocked from editing for vandalism of Wikipedia. Please note that page blanking, addition of random text or spam, deliberate misinformation, privacy violations, and repeated and blatant violation of WP:NPOV are considered vandalism. If you wish to make useful contributions, you may come back after the block expires. — xaosflux Talk 02:37, 6 July 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Your edit to Iggy Pop

Your recent edit to Iggy Pop (diff) was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to recognize and repair vandalism to Wikipedia articles. If the bot reverted a legitimate edit, please accept my humble creator's apologies – if you bring it to the attention of the bot's owner, we may be able to improve its behavior. Click here for frequently asked questions about the bot and this warning. // Tawkerbot2 03:38, 11 July 2006 (UTC)

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize pages, as you did to Tom Cruise, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. A link to the edit I have reverted can be found here: link. If you believe this edit should not have been reverted, please contact me. Steve 06:55, 13 July 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Your message on my talkpage.

2006-07-23 01:24:44 152.163.100.72:

I will try to keep my articles serious if you try to MIND YOUR OWN BUSSINESS. I havent written anything here in quite some time, and have enjoyed watching this form grow, and learn from others, but it seems like some HUGE JERKOFF always wants to go and belittle me, irregardless. There simply is no reasom to be hateful like that. What article are you referring to? Most of my posts have been exceptoinal, earning me many a barn star award. I noticed you havent got that many, so Im gonna go ahead and give you one of mine as a peace offering, but in the future try not to belittle me as I have been tutoring to become an ADMINISTRATOR!!!

I assume that you are Pickelbarrel. If I am wrong, I apologize.

“I will try to keep my articles serious if you try to MIND YOUR OWN BUSSINESS.”

Sorry, but a user on Sho.Com [1] called Jaker claims to be you and vandalize WikiPedia.Org. If Jaker is not you, you should complain to Sho.Com about Jaker impersonating you and get Jaker banned from Sho.Com.

“I havent written anything here in quite some time, and have enjoyed watching this form grow, and learn from others, but it seems like some HUGE JERKOFF always wants to go and belittle me, irregardless.”

I am sorry if that is the impression I gave.

“There simply is no reasom to be hateful like that.”

Again, I apologize.

“What article are you referring to?”

This is what Jaker said he did:

jaker

posts: 154

07/22/2006 12:30 AM

re: Global Warming

I dont know that most vandals get deleted in less than five minuites...I added some fake shit myself about Ben Folds lyp syning after he encourages us to post shit on the web about it during one of his concerts, and added a bit about Kris Roe from The Ataries coming back and screeming “Fuck The Space Shuttle” after playing with the Severe and Profound (An inside joke between him and I) that lasted about a week.

Jimbo has made weird rules about all kinds of shit, although Im not sure about deciding on specific revisions, and the main editors quarrel about the rules constanly.

I created a user based on the chatracter Timothy Dexler(aguy considered to be the most lucky man in the world regardless of the fact that he is a notoriously bad speller, and dumb as toast) call pickelbarrel that added shit to wikipedia all the time, and have seen first hand the way editors will change the rules base entirely on their whims, and weather or not they like you.

I would add good posts, and relevent links and have some editors immediately take them down, while other editors would fight for me claiming I was adding legitimate articles. Thing is, neither side base dit the actual article, they based it on weather they liked me, or thought the article should even be in wikipedia.

The whole reason i started screwing with the system, was to put in a entry for one of my freinds bands, but then I realized that that they didnt have an entry for taint(slang) and I decided to add one, what followed was one of the most heated battles Ive ever witnessed over the validity of allowing “taint” in wikipedia. The whole thing was histerical, but I learned alot about the folley that goes on in wikipedia...including some disputes editors had with the esteemed Jimbo.

I never reall took the stuff personally, because who cares, but Ill tell you what, you can see rules being bent and changed all over the place in that mad house. Giving all the examples would take too much time, but I remeber a debate over weather a link should be added to Izzy Stradlin and the Ju Ju Hounds on the Guns -N- Roses website. The argument against it was that his band wasnt relevent to G-N-R but they had links to LA Gunns, Slashes Snake Pitt, and Velvet Revolver. The entries weere definately NOT from a neutral POV, as they assume that Izzy isnt as important member as Slash.

Now that alone wouldnt be a problem, but the whole site is riddled with this kind of shit, and editors who dont want their articles changed (one editor was furious with people who kept going to his beloved “dingleberry” site and adding references to clumps of stuff that hangs from peoples ass)

Now all that being said, wikipedia isnt a bad source, but again it just isnt reliable. Go in and add something to an article that is partially true, but not completely. If its not some article that one of these editors gaurds, you will find out just how long it lasts. Im not paticualrily clever and if MY completely nonscensical articles can stay up for over a week, then Ill bet there are plenty others that have lasted longer.

As I say, most of the articles are good, many are incomplet, some are bad, and a few are completely wrong.

As long as you realize this going in, your fine. It is certainly helpful in finding info about certain subjects, jsut dont rely on it to validate your facts.

“Most of my posts have been exceptoinal, earning me many a barn star award.”

That is great.

“I noticed you havent got that many, so Im gonna go ahead and give you one of mine as a peace offering,”

¡Thanks! It is very nice, but I am not into penispictures.

“but in the future try not to belittle me as I have been tutoring to become an ADMINISTRATOR!!!”

I hope you do well.

-

— Ŭalabio‽ 03:37, 23 July 2006 (UTC)

==NO PERSONAL ATTACKS== Please see Wikipedia's no personal attacks policy. Comment on content, not on the contributor; personal attacks damage the community and deter users. Note that continued personal attacks may lead to blocks for disruption. Please stay cool and keep this in mind while editing. Thank you. - Glen 07:57, 23 July 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Vandalism

Why dont you tell me what in the hell you are talking about when you say my articles are nonsense. what articles are you referring to? ALL of my articles have ben of the highest caliber, and I havent even posted anything in months, and then you come in acting all high and mighty, and correcting me for something or other for who knows what reason. I have some advice for you, if you are taking some kind of drugs, you need to quit. I have seen first hand the danger that they can cause. You are making yourself look foolish. VERY FOOLISH!!! In order to help with motivate your recovery I will award you this barnstar.

I shall assume that you are PickelBarrel because I wrote to me shortly after I left a message for him. If you are not, I apologize.
Someone on Sho.Com claimed to be Pickelbarrel and vandalize WikiPedia.Org. I merely left a not on the talkpage of Pickelbarrel explaining that WikiPedia.Org is a serious project and pointing him to Unencyclopedia.Org as a place for not true contributions. If none of this applies to you, I apologize. If Jaker lied to me about being you, you can complain to Sho.Com anf get him banned for impersonating you.
I apologize for the inconvenience.

—

— Ŭalabio‽ 19:13, 23 July 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Blocked

You have been temporarily blocked from editing for vandalism of Wikipedia. If you wish to make useful contributions, you may do so after the block expires.

KillerChihuahua?!? 19:59, 25 July 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Your edit to Fidel Castro

Your recent edit to Fidel Castro (diff) was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to recognize and repair vandalism to Wikipedia articles. If the bot reverted a legitimate edit, please accept my humble creator's apologies – if you bring it to the attention of the bot's owner, we may be able to improve its behavior. Click here for frequently asked questions about the bot and this warning. // AntiVandalBot 21:25, 1 August 2006 (UTC)

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 3 hours for vandalizing Wikipedia. If you wish to make useful contributions, you are welcome to come back after the block expires. JoanneB 21:29, 1 August 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Your edit to Nanny

Welcome to Wikipedia. We invite everyone to contribute constructively to our encyclopedia. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing. However, unconstructive edits are considered vandalism, and if you continue in this manner you may be blocked from editing without further warning. Please stop, and consider improving rather than damaging the work of others. Thank you.

[edit] August 2006

You have been temporarily blocked from editing for vandalism of Wikipedia. Please note that page blanking, addition of random text or spam, deliberate misinformation, privacy violations, and other deliberate attempts to disrupt Wikipedia are considered vandalism. If you wish to make useful contributions, you may come back after the block expires. - Richardcavell 02:35, 15 August 2006 (UTC)

Welcome to Wikipedia. We invite everyone to contribute constructively to our encyclopedia. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing. However, unconstructive edits are considered vandalism, and if you continue in this manner you may be blocked from editing without further warning. Please stop, and consider improving rather than damaging the work of others. Thank you. ST47 18:48, 16 August 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Rude

I see you're also a vandal. My reason for coming here is that you're being a big nuisance on the reference desk, asking stupid and sometimes even rude questions. Several have been removed already:

DirkvdM 06:14, 17 August 2006 (UTC)

The same user also edits as User:64.12.116.72 and as User:205.188.117.12, both vandal accounts.  --LambiamTalk 07:48, 17 August 2006 (UTC)
Both per page sharedips, they're not "accounts" they're proxies assigned to certian pages by AOL, not to certian users--152.163.100.13 16:16, 17 August 2006 (UTC)
But the people doing the edits are people, not proxies. I'm saying: it is the same person who floods the reference desks with inane questions, now as User:64.12.116.72, then as User:152.163.100.72, then as User:205.188.117.12. --LambiamTalk 22:00, 17 August 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Reference desk

Please do not waste people's time by asking silly questions. The reference desk is only for questions of fact. DJ Clayworth 15:56, 17 August 2006 (UTC)

  • There's no way for AOL editors to receive new messages at all, so just do what everyone else does, leave a bv template, then block them for "ignoring" warnings--152.163.100.13 16:17, 17 August 2006 (UTC)

I've blocked this IP from editing for a short time because it does not seem to be interested in doing anything but vandalizing. --Fastfission 16:05, 17 August 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Your edit to Squirrel Boy

Your recent edit to Squirrel Boy (diff) was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to recognize and repair vandalism to Wikipedia articles. If the bot reverted a legitimate edit, please accept my humble creator's apologies – if you bring it to the attention of the bot's owner, we may be able to improve its behavior. Click here for frequently asked questions about the bot and this warning. // Tawkerbot2 04:28, 19 August 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Edit Summary

Please avoid using abusive and inappropriate edit summaries as per Wikipedia:Civility and Wikipedia:No personal attacks. Thanks and happy editing. Daniel.Bryant 03:32, 26 August 2006 (UTC)

Thank you for experimenting with the page Physical anthropology on Wikipedia. Your test worked, and it has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. A link to the edit I have reverted can be found here: link. If you believe this edit should not have been reverted, please contact me. DrunkenSmurf 22:14, 3 September 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Knights Templar

I see you have been experimenting with Wikipedia. Your change was determined to be unhelpful, and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. Thanks. -- SnaX 01:13, 4 September 2006 (UTC)

Please refrain from adding nonsense to Wikipedia, as you did to African slave trade. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. A link to the edit I have reverted can be found here: link. If you believe this edit should not have been reverted, please contact me. FractureTalk   20:00, 4 September 2006 (UTC)

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize pages, as you did to Blackground Records, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. A link to the edit I have reverted can be found here: link. If you believe this edit should not have been reverted, please contact me. Khukri (talk . contribs) 20:11, 4 September 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Your edit to Brian Kendrick

Your recent edit to Brian Kendrick (diff) was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to recognize and repair vandalism to Wikipedia articles. If the bot reverted a legitimate edit, please accept my humble creator's apologies – if you bring it to the attention of the bot's owner, we may be able to improve its behavior. Click here for frequently asked questions about the bot and this warning. // AntiVandalBot 05:03, 9 September 2006 (UTC)

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize pages, as you did to Yung Joc, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. A link to the edit I have reverted can be found here: link. If you believe this edit should not have been reverted, please contact me. cholmes75 (chit chat) 21:47, 10 September 2006 (UTC)

This is your last warning.
The next time you vandalize a page, as you did to Lipid, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. A link to the edit I have reverted can be found here: link. If you believe this edit should not have been reverted, please contact me. TBCTaLk?!? 21:26, 19 September 2006 (UTC)

This is your last warning.
The next time you vandalize a page, as you did to Province of Georgia, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. A link to the edit I have reverted can be found here: link. If you believe this edit should not have been reverted, please contact me. --Nishkid64 23:27, 21 September 2006 (UTC)

Welcome to Wikipedia. We invite everyone to contribute constructively to our encyclopedia. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing. However, unconstructive edits are considered vandalism, and if you continue in this manner you may be blocked from editing without further warning. Please stop, and consider improving rather than damaging the work of others. Thank you. Whispering(talk/c) 01:02, 25 September 2006 (UTC)

Welcome to Wikipedia. We invite everyone to contribute constructively to our encyclopedia. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing. However, unconstructive edits, such as those you made to Medicine, are considered vandalism. If you continue in this manner you may be blocked from editing without further warning. Please stop, and consider improving rather than damaging the hard work of others. Thanks. Orayzio 22:41, 1 October 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Your edit to Squirrel Boy

Your recent edit to Squirrel Boy (diff) was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to recognize and repair vandalism to Wikipedia articles. If the bot reverted a legitimate edit, please accept my humble creator's apologies – if you bring it to the attention of the bot's owner, we may be able to improve its behavior. Click here for frequently asked questions about the bot and this warning. // AntiVandalBot 00:16, 11 October 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Your edit to The Third Temple

You know what you did. Since you have received numerous warnings per the above, I am reporting you directly for blocking. Have a nice day, --Shirahadasha 04:26, 13 October 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Your edit to Kosher tax

Please do not remove content from Wikipedia. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Jayjg (talk) 21:54, 23 October 2006 (UTC)

Your change to the page And the Cat Came Back was determined to be unhelpful, and has been reverted. Please use the sandbox for any tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing. Thanks. A link to the edit I have reverted can be found here: link. If you believe this edit should not have been reverted, please contact me. Tarret 01:52, 27 October 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Civility

Please read Wikipedia:No personal attacks. If you have a question or would like to discuss one of my edits with me, feel free to contact me, but placing this type of comment is unconstructive, can be highly offensive, and repeated actions of this nature could result in you being blocked. Dar-Ape 02:45, 28 October 2006 (UTC)

[edit] List of NASCAR drivers

Please do not add nonsense to Wikipedia, as you did to List of NASCAR drivers. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. --D-Day I'm all ears How can I improve? 15:41, 28 October 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Your edit to Snake

Your recent edit to Snake (diff) was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to recognize and repair vandalism to Wikipedia articles. If the bot reverted a legitimate edit, please accept my humble creator's apologies – if you bring it to the attention of the bot's owner, we may be able to improve its behavior. Click here for frequently asked questions about the bot and this warning. // AntiVandalBot 00:26, 31 October 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Your edit to Sexual harassment

Your recent edit to Sexual harassment (diff) was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to recognize and repair vandalism to Wikipedia articles. If the bot reverted a legitimate edit, please accept my humble creator's apologies – if you bring it to the attention of the bot's owner, we may be able to improve its behavior. Click here for frequently asked questions about the bot and this warning. // AntiVandalBot 02:58, 1 November 2006 (UTC)

Thank you for experimenting with the page Fidel Castro on Wikipedia. Your test worked, and it has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you may want to do. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. Matteo 10:00, 1 November 2006 (UTC)

Please do not add nonsense to Wikipedia, as you did to Billboard 200. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. - Tutmosis 16:56, 4 November 2006 (UTC)

Please do not add nonsense to Wikipedia, as you did to Fidel Castro. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. A link to the edit I have reverted can be found here: link. If you believe this edit should not have been reverted, please contact me. Eron 22:42, 4 November 2006 (UTC)

This is your last warning.
The next time you vandalize a page, as you did to Archbishop Hoban High School, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Patstuart(talk)(contribs) 23:21, 4 November 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Nov 10

Please do not add nonsense to Wikipedia, as you did to Yung Joc. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. Dcooper 20:21, 10 November 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Your edit to Drew Bledsoe

Your recent edit to Drew Bledsoe (diff) was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to recognize and repair vandalism to Wikipedia articles. If the bot reverted a legitimate edit, please accept my humble creator's apologies – if you bring it to the attention of the bot's owner, we may be able to improve its behavior. Click here for frequently asked questions about the bot and this warning. // AntiVandalBot 12:04, 16 November 2006 (UTC)

Retrieved from "http://en.wikipedia.org../../../1/5/2/User_talk%7E152.163.100.72.html"