User talk:134.134.136.3

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Attention:

This IP address, 134.134.136.3, is registered to Intel Corporation and may be shared by multiple users. In the case of organizations using proxy servers, this IP address may in fact represent many users at many physical computers.

For this reason a message intended for one person may be received by another. If you are editing from this address and are frustrated by irrelevant messages, you can avoid them by creating an account for yourself. (In some cases you may temporarily be unable to create an account due to efforts to fight vandalism in which case we invite you to try again at a later time or from a different computer.)

In the event of vandalism from this address, efforts will be made to contact Intel Corporation to report network abuse.

Caution should be used when blocking this IP or reverting its contributions without checking - if a block is needed, administrators should consider using a soft block.

Thanks for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your test worked, and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. Thanks.

Blocked
You have been blocked for vandalism for 24 hours. To contest this block, add the text {{unblock}} on this page, along with an explanation of why you believe this block to be unjustified. You can also email the blocking administrator or any administrator from this list. Please be sure to include your username and IP address in your email.

Do not erase this page or any of the warnings on it. Doing so is also considered vandalism.

Leithp (talk) 14:31, 27 December 2005 (UTC)

Contents

[edit] Legal Threats

Hi. It is inappropriate to edit Wikipedia while making threats of legal action against another user. Any legal proceedings you wish to undertake should be conducted through proper channels and not on Wikipedia pages. As an administrator of Wikipedia, I will block your account if you continue to make threats of legal action against Wikipedia users. Correspondence from your solicitor should be addressed to the Wikimedia Foundation or an individual user and may not be conducted on Wikipedia itself. Regards, The Land 22:54, 2 June 2006 (UTC)

  • I have blocked this IP for a month for legal threats. --Improv 23:51, 2 June 2006 (UTC)

I understand that even after being blocked, you are continuing to make your legal threats through email. If this can be confirmed, it may be grounds for a permanent ban against any accounts you are using. I strongly urge you to stop making these threats immediately. Read WP:LEGAL. --Yamla 15:11, 3 June 2006 (UTC)

  • Lifting block as per reciept of apology for legal threats. --Improv 22:08, 8 June 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Blocked

You have been temporarily blocked from editing because of your disruptive edits. You are invited to contribute in a constructive manner as soon as the block expires. // Pilotguy (Have your say) 22:20, 18 October 2006 (UTC)

{{unblock|This IP belongs to a web-proxy for a multi-national corporation that employs over 100,000 people. While I'm sure that the block was justified, it negatively impacts the those of us that do constructively conbtribute wikipedia from work. Please consider taking this topic of reoccuring abuse with the company that owns this IP.}}

This IP address appears to belong to Intel. Is that the case? If so, this address should be marked as such. Is this block affecting any signed in users or only people trying to edit anonymously? It's reasonable to block anonymous editors from Intel given the large amount of vandalism originating from here but we should still allow signed-in users. --Yamla 22:47, 18 October 2006 (UTC)
And being extremely pedantic, Intel apparently "only" employs 99,900 employees, not over 100,000. Not that this is at all relevant. --Yamla 22:48, 18 October 2006 (UTC)

I thought I did a soft block... I'll try again. // Pilotguy (Have your say) 22:57, 18 October 2006 (UTC)

This user's request to have the autoblock on their IP address lifted has been DECLINED.

Vandalism from this IP. If you feel this block is unfairly impacting you, please register an account.

  • Blocking admin: not provided.
  • Decline reason:

Not an autoblock. --Yamla 17:26, 1 November 2006 (UTC)


Note: declined unblock requests may only be removed after two days or when the block has expired.

Welcome to Wikipedia. We invite everyone to contribute constructively to our encyclopedia. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing. However, unconstructive edits are considered vandalism. If you continue in this manner you may be blocked from editing without further warning. Please stop, and consider improving rather than damaging the work of others. Thank you. Article Mexico City. -- Egil 10:10, 7 December 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Vandalism

Unconstructive edits are considered vandalism. If you continue in this manner you may be blocked from editing without further warning. Please stop, and consider improving rather than damaging the work of others. Thank you. Article - Criticism section of Off-roading. Athene cunicularia 15:16, 19 December 2006 (UTC)

[edit] March 2007

Welcome to Wikipedia. We invite everyone to contribute constructively to our encyclopedia. Some of your recent edits, such as those you made to Hindu, have been considered unhelpful or unconstructive and have been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Buddhipriya 21:23, 19 March 2007 (UTC)

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Friedman (unit), you will be blocked from editing. A link to the edit I have reverted can be found here: link. If you believe this edit should not have been reverted, please contact me. NSR77 (Talk|Contribs) 22:52, 19 March 2007 (UTC)

This blocked user (block log | autoblocks | unblock | contribs) asked to be unblocked, but an administrator or other user has reviewed and declined this request. Other administrators or users can also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy). This unblock request continues to be visible. Do not replace this message with another unblock request nor add another unblock request.

Request reason: "see below"


Decline reason: "You're not blocked. See your block logJohn Reaves (talk) 08:58, 20 March 2007 (UTC)"

This template should be removed when the block has expired, or after 2 days in the case of blocks of 1 week or longer.

Hi. I am the person at Intel who performed the edit to Friedman Unit that was considered vandalism.

I contest the charactarization as vandalism. I cannot find any argument on this page supporting this supposition. I thought that my contribution was helpful by removing quotes that did not resemble the meaning of the "Friedman unit" that the page was about. If this removal was considered vandalism, I would greatly appreciate an explanation of what the proper and acceptable course of action would have been. Vandalism was never my intention.

I would also like to point out that I NEVER made ANY legal threats of ANYONE.

Thank you, and again, I apologize for anything that was interpreted as vandalism. However, it is also more likely that I will simply refrain from editing in the future if my contributions are going to be considered vandalism and legal threats are going to be made against me as a result.

Hopefully I have responded correctly, as I am somewhat confused by this page I am being presented.

Note to reviewing Admin: I did check out the edit to Friedman (unit), and this editor was correct. The example linked to Senator Lieberman did not come from the cited article, and was correctly removed. Risker 05:29, 20 March 2007 (UTC)