User talk:132.205.44.134

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

You have new messages (last change).

Welcome!

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for your contributions.

Currently, you are editing anonymously. You can continue to do so. You are not required to log in to Wikipedia to read and write articles, but not doing so will result in your IP address being shown instead of a username (yours is 132.205.44.134). There are many benefits for logging in to Wikipedia.

Please note these points:

The Wikipedia Tutorial is a good place to start learning about Wikipedia. If you have any questions, ask me on my Talk page – I will answer your questions as far as I can! Thank you again for contributing to Wikipedia.

from Wikipedian: -- Spinboy 30 June 2005 06:07 (UTC)

Contents

[edit] Legend of Zelda Categories

Note: as the following comment is left for an editor at an IP address, it is unlikely that it will reach its intended recipient. Please ignore this comment if it doesn't relate to you.

As someone who has previously voted or commented at the recent CfD discussion about the naming of Legend of Zelda categories, I thought I would let you know that I have started a new discussion in an attempt to reach a consensus. The current position of having 2 sets of categories serving the exact same purpose is unsustainable, and we need to reach a consensus on which set should be removed. If you have previously voted on this proposal, I would ask you to reconsider your vote, and ask yourself whether you are willing to give a little ground in order to reach a compromise. This is a generic message I am leaving for everyone who took part in the previous discussion. Thank you for your time. Road Wizard 14:34, 28 June 2006 (UTC)

[edit] On garden leave

Please do not remove the factual accuracy tag without providing sources. BlueValour 02:39, 11 July 2006 (UTC)

There was no such tag on the page when I editted it, so I did not remove it. 132.205.44.134 02:42, 11 July 2006 (UTC)

[edit] 2-pounder gun

Hi, thanks for your response on the request for a move of the page 2-pounder gun. However, I have a sneaky feeling you were responding to the older requested move from "pom pom gun" to "2-pounder gun", as my reasons for moving it away from "2-pounder gun" to "QF 2 pounder naval gun" are similar to your reasons for opposing the move. Regards. Emoscopes Talk 11:35, 19 September 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Your edit to Category:Hypothetical dwarf planets

Your recent edit to Category:Hypothetical dwarf planets (diff) was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to recognize and repair vandalism to Wikipedia articles. If the bot reverted a legitimate edit, please accept my humble creator's apologies – if you bring it to the attention of the bot's owner, we may be able to improve its behavior. Click here for frequently asked questions about the bot and this warning. // Tawkerbot4 23:30, 26 September 2006 (UTC)

Actually, I was trying to repair damage. The category was uncategorized and had an article as text. 132.205.44.134 23:33, 26 September 2006 (UTC)
See User_talk:Tawkerbot4#edit_to_Category:Hypothetical_dwarf_planets

[edit] Your edit to Burning Plains

Your recent edit to Burning Plains (diff) was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to recognize and repair vandalism to Wikipedia articles. If the bot reverted a legitimate edit, please accept my humble creator's apologies – if you bring it to the attention of the bot's owner, we may be able to improve its behavior. Click here for frequently asked questions about the bot and this warning. // AntiVandalBot 01:27, 29 September 2006 (UTC)

I changed Burning Plains into a redirect. There was two sentences there all told, already in the redirected target. 132.205.44.134 01:28, 29 September 2006 (UTC)
See Places in the Inheritance trilogy
See User talk:AntiVandalBot#Burning Plains
User:Delirium has implemented this redirect for me. 132.205.45.206 01:24, 30 September 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Double vote on Antichthon/Counter-Earth merge vote

You should be careful not to vote twice in discussions on article deletion, merges, etc. It damages the credibility of your vote. You may want to strike one of the votes out in the Antichthon/Counter-Earth merge discussion. George J. Bendo 09:11, 29 September 2006 (UTC)

It's actually supposed to be one vote (the top Oppose), the two subpoints are the reasons I oppose it. I've made it clearer. 132.205.45.206 01:20, 30 September 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Field of the Nebula

One of the references that you helpfully added to the Field of the Nebulae article identifies this as a term for the Virgo Cluster. Would you object if I turned this article into a redirect for the Virgo Cluster while inserting the name "Field of the Nebulae" into the Virgo Cluster article? (If I receive no response from you by 16 Nov 2006, I will do so anyway.) George J. Bendo 07:18, 9 November 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Talk:Académie française

Hi!

Did you see my response to your arguments? --Espoo 10:38, 25 November 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Astronomy background

Since you typically comment on many astronomy-related page renames, page deletions, category renames, and category deletions, I thought it would be good to learn what your background is in astronomy. Could you please give me an idea of your experience with astronomy? This may help me write my category/article move/deletion nominations better and/or build consensus for such actions (or not even attempt such actions in some situations). For information on my experience in astronomy, you can do a Google search on "George Bendo" or an author search at the ADS Abstract Service on "Bendo". Thank you, Dr. Submillimeter 07:11, 30 November 2006 (UTC)

[edit] WikiLove

Esurnir has smiled at you! Smiles promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. Spread the WikiLove by smiling to someone else, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Happy editing!
Smile at others by adding {{subst:smile}}, {{subst:smile2}} or {{subst:smile3}} to their talk page with a friendly message.

-- Esurnir 23:06, 11 January 2007 (UTC)

Just a friendly reminder to use an edit summary when proposing deletion for an article. Edit summary usage is always good, but it is especially important that edit summaries are used when proposing deletion. The reason for this is that articles proposed for deletion that later have the {{prod}} tag removed should not be proposed for deletion again, but rather sent to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion. The only easy way to check if an article was previously proposed for deletion is to look at the edit history and the edit summaries people have left before. Thanks! Oo7565 05:15, 30 March 2007 (UTC)

Retrieved from "http://en.wikipedia.org../../../1/3/2/User_talk%7E132.205.44.134.html"