User talk:132.185.240.121

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Image:Info-pictogram.png Attention:

This IP address, 132.185.240.121, is registered to the British Broadcasting Corporation and is shared by multiple users. Comments left on this page may be received by other users of this IP and appear to be irrelevant. Caution should be used when blocking this IP or reverting its contributions without checking. In the event of vandalism from this address, efforts will be made to contact the British Broadcasting Corporation to report abuse.

If you are an unregistered user operating from this address, note that this need not necessarily be the IP address of your machine. In many cases, it turns out to be the IP address of a proxy server that communicates between your browser and the Wikimedia servers. Such proxies are shared among a huge number of users compared to the number of persons using your particular machine. If you are frustrated by irrelevant comments appearing here, you can avoid them by creating an account for yourself. However, you will still be unable to edit Wikipedia while the IP you are using is blocked.

Contents

[edit] experimenting with Wikipedia

Thanks for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your test worked, and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. Thanks. -- [[User:Solitude|Solitude\talk]] 14:37, Nov 24, 2004 (UTC)

[edit] stop adding nonsense

Please stop adding nonsense to Wikipedia. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. -- [[User:Solitude|Solitude\talk]] 14:42, Nov 24, 2004 (UTC)

[edit] fictional article

This user created a fictional article, Boy*d_Upp, for the purposes of viral marketing. 24.148.19.210 16:39, 14 August 2005 (UTC)

[edit] do not add commercial links

Please do not add commercial links — or links to your own private websites — to Wikipedia. Wikipedia is not a vehicle for advertising or a mere collection of external links. See the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. Thanks. Jkelly 16:40, 5 December 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Devilfish

Although I removed your text, I linked to the site in question at the bottom of the page. This is to reduce copyright problems with usage of the text, and to save space in the article's real estate. Essexmutant 09:48, 23 February 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Request to make account

Welcome to Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia! You don't have to log in to read or edit articles on Wikipedia, but creating an account is quick, free and non-intrusive, requires no personal information, and gives you many benefits, including:

We hope that you choose to become a Wikipedian and create an account. Feel free to ask me any questions you may have on my talk page. By the way, make sure to sign your posts and comments with four tildes (~~~~), which will let others know who left it. Oleg Alexandrov (talk) 20:16, 25 May 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Edit of the Denise Richards Article

Thanks for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your test of deliberately adding incorrect information worked, and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. Thanks.

The Edit in question

Your edit of Denise Richards changed facts as stated in the source newspaper article. This is vandalism of the worst kind. If you feel that your edits were appropriate, please discuss the issue on Talk:Denise Richards.--Jeff 19:30, 16 November 2006 (UTC)

[edit] "untrue" material removed from Jeremy Vine article

I notice someone there at the BBC took objection to the description of Jeremy Vine's radio 2 show as 'tabloid journalism', and removed an example, describing it as 'untrue' (from the edit summary). The example was, specifically, Vine's taking to task of the presenter of the Channel 4 documentary "Religion: The Root of all Evil" over the accuracy of the title of said documentary, while comparing it with Vine's own headline of "school children forced to take drugs tests at the school gates" (a headline that was untrue). Neither of those examples are untrue, as a simple replay of the broadcasts would show; the latter headline clearly demonstrates Vine's tabloid journalistic style, as do many of his other broadcasts. Perhaps when editing out facts, it would be worth checking before you declare these facts to be "untrue".

[edit] Repeat Issues

Looking at other comments on this talk page, this doesn't seem to be the first instance of this sort of editing. Kindly stop. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Carre (talk • contribs) 18:33, 22 December 2006 (UTC).

[edit] Final Warning

This is the only warning you will receive. Your actions will not be tolerated. The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, you will be blocked. 1B6 13:36, 1 February 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Nullity media impass

Hi Lunch, it seems we've reached an impass on editing the Media section on the nullity story. Feel free to drop me a line at ben.moore@bbc.co.uk if you want to discuss it. All the best Ben Moore —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 132.185.144.120 (talk) 15:39, 4 February 2007 (UTC).

Mr. Moore, I think the phrase "criticized as irresponsible journalism" is a fair summary of the responses to your article. I will continue to revert your removal of this phrase. I also suggest that you read the guidelines at WP:COI, and that you refrain from editing the James Anderson article in the future. Lunch 17:15, 5 February 2007 (UTC)
Retrieved from "http://en.wikipedia.org../../../1/3/2/User_talk%7E132.185.240.121.html"