User talk:132.185.144.120

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Image:Info-pictogram.png Attention:

This IP address, 132.185.144.120, is registered to British Broadcasting Corporation and is shared by multiple users. Comments left on this page may be received by other users of this IP and appear to be irrelevant. Caution should be used when blocking this IP or reverting its contributions without checking. In the event of vandalism from this address, efforts will be made to contact British Broadcasting Corporation to report abuse.

If you are an unregistered user operating from this address, note that this need not necessarily be the IP address of your machine. In many cases, it turns out to be the IP address of a proxy server that communicates between your browser and the Wikimedia servers. Such proxies are shared among a huge number of users compared to the number of persons using your particular machine. If you are frustrated by irrelevant comments appearing here, you can avoid them by creating an account for yourself. However, you will still be unable to edit Wikipedia while the IP you are using is blocked.

  • Thanks for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your test worked, and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. Thanks. Estel (talk) 19:38, Jan 10, 2005 (UTC)
  • About article 'Segnomin'. Indeed it's non verified : one hit in Google. But it is actually perfectly verifiable for the element 74 in Mendeleiev classification is tungsten. Also the tone of the article is defnitely hilarious ! Very good laugh, but a non existent element retreating when exposed to of light leaves no doubt about this joke. Please sign comments. (Note further interference with nonsense notification can be considered as vandalism. Byr bye! Gtabary 19:45, 10 Jan 2005 (UTC)
  • In Welsh Highland Railway I agree with all of your changes bar the external link for WHR(C). I have changed this back, as the page I set it to is the official page. If you disagree with this, please visit my talk page. --John 11:17, 27 May 2005 (UTC)

Contents

[edit] Copyright

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! We welcome and appreciate your contributions, such as Alastair yates, but we regretfully cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from either web sites or printed material.

This article appears to be a direct copy from this site. As a copyright violation, Alastair yates appears to qualify for speedy deletion under the speedy deletion criteria. Alastair yates has been tagged for deletion, and may have been deleted by the time you see this message. If the source is a credible one, please consider rewriting the content and citing the source.

If you believe that the article is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under the GFDL, you can comment to that effect on Talk:Alastair yates. If the article has already been deleted, but you have a proper release, you can reenter the content at Alastair yates, after describing the release on the talk page. However, you may want to consider rewriting the content in your own words.

Thank you, and please feel free to continue contributing to Wikipedia. Broken S 05:41, 22 October 2005 (UTC)

[edit] John Seigenthaler Sr.

Please stop adding nonsense to Wikipedia. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. Kaldari 16:25, 15 December 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Edith Bowman

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize pages by deliberately introducing incorrect information, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. I am reporting this vandalism to the BBC. --David Johnson [T|C] 16:53, 18 January 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Crucified Barbara

Your article Crucified Barbara has appeared in the Dead End Pages list because it is not wikified. Please consult the Wikipedia Guide to Layout for more information on how to write a good, wikified article. I would encourage you to revisit your submissions and {{wikify}} them. Thanks and happy editing! James084 23:55, 24 February 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Please cite sources

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! We welcome and appreciate your contributions, such as King's College School, but we regretfully cannot accept original research. Please find and add a reliable citation to your recent edit so we can verify your work. Uncited information may be removed at any time. Thanks for your efforts, and happy editing! Can't sleep, clown will eat me 19:08, 16 June 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Your edit to Mettoy-Corgi

Your recent edit to Mettoy-Corgi (diff) was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to recognize and repair vandalism to Wikipedia articles. If the bot reverted a legitimate edit, please accept my humble creator's apologies – if you bring it to the attention of the bot's owner, we may be able to improve its behavior. Click here for frequently asked questions about the bot and this warning. // AntiVandalBot 19:00, 26 July 2006 (UTC)

[edit] August 2006

Thank you for experimenting with the page Carl Chinn on Wikipedia. Your test worked, and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. NawlinWiki 14:49, 14 August 2006 (UTC)

[edit] American Empire

Looking forward to your continued future edits on American Empire. Looks like you are sharing an ISP with a vicious vandal. Don't want all of these nasty messages to scare you off. Best wishes and welcome to wikipedia.Travb (talk) 15:30, 15 August 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Jim Hawkins

Your edit to Jim Hawkins has been reverted for the third time. If you wish to pursue your change, I suggest you approach the matter on the article's talk page to garner consenus before making the change. Otherwise your actions maybe interpreted as vandalism. Agne 13:52, 18 August 2006 (UTC)

[edit] 26 October

Please do not add inappropriate external links to Wikipedia, as you did in Himachal Pradesh. Wikipedia is not a mere directory of links nor should it be used for advertising or promotion. Inappropriate links include (but are not limited to) links to personal web sites, links to web sites that you are affiliated with, and links that exist to attract visitors to a web site or promote a product. See the external links guideline and spam policies for further explanations of links that are considered appropriate. If you feel the link should be added to the article, then please discuss it on the article's talk page rather than re-adding it. See the welcome page to learn more about Wikipedia. Thank you. -- Lost(talk) 16:38, 26 October 2006 (UTC)

This is your last warning.
The next time you vandalize a page, as you did to The Trials of Van Occupanther, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. A link to the edit I have reverted can be found here: link. If you believe this edit should not have been reverted, please contact me. Hello32020 14:58, 7 November 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Vandalism Warning - November 27

I removed your change to the page Jamie Lee Curtis as unhelpful. (A diff of your edit is here). Please use the sandbox for any tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. Thanks. Thanks, TheronJ 17:40, 27 November 2006 (UTC)

Please do not add inappropriate external links to Wikipedia, as you did in BBC Radio Five Live. Wikipedia is not a mere directory of links nor should it be used for advertising or promotion. Inappropriate links include (but are not limited to) links to personal web sites, links to web sites with which you are affiliated, and links that exist to attract visitors to a web site or promote a product. See the external links guideline and spam policies for further explanations of links that are considered appropriate. If you feel the link should be added to the article, then please discuss it on the article's talk page rather than re-adding it. See the welcome page to learn more about Wikipedia. Thank you. A link to the edit I have reverted can be found here: link. If you believe this edit should not have been reverted, please contact me. A link to the edit I have reverted can be found here: link. If you believe this edit should not have been reverted, please contact me. Yonatanh 13:49, 25 January 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Nullity media impass

Hi Lunch, it seems we've reached an impass on editing the Media section on the nullity story. Feel free to drop me a line at ben.moore@bbc.co.uk if you want to discuss it. All the best Ben Moore —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 132.185.144.120 (talk) 15:39, 4 February 2007 (UTC).

Mr. Moore, I think the phrase "criticized as irresponsible journalism" is a fair summary of the responses to your article. I will continue to revert your removal of this phrase. I also suggest that you read the guidelines at WP:COI, and that you refrain from editing the James Anderson article in the future. Lunch 17:16, 5 February 2007 (UTC)

Having read the guidelines, I concede the point that I perhaps should not edit material relating to my work. I will not change the line again, but do say for the record that a regional, end item piece on a maths problem is hardly "irresponsible journalism"...Ben.

Thanks. For what it's worth, I don't think your piece was irresponsible, and I wasn't the one to originally write that phrase into the James Anderson article. Lunch 18:41, 9 February 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Regarding edits made 4 March 2007 to Edward Woodward

Please do not add unhelpful and non-constructive information to Wikipedia. Your edits could be considered vandalism, and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Naohiro19(Talk Page/Contributions/This user send to E-mail) 15:25, 4 March 2007 (UTC)