User talk:129.49.7.122

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

You have new messages (last change).
Image:Info-pictogram.png Attention:

This IP address, 129.49.7.122, is registered to Stony Brook University and is shared by multiple users. Comments left on this page may be received by other users of this IP and appear to be irrelevant. Caution should be used when blocking this IP or reverting its contributions without checking. In the event of vandalism from this address, efforts will be made to contact Stony Brook University to report abuse.

If you are an unregistered user operating from this address, note that this need not necessarily be the IP address of your machine. In many cases, it turns out to be the IP address of a proxy server that communicates between your browser and the Wikimedia servers. Such proxies are shared among a huge number of users compared to the number of persons using your particular machine. If you are frustrated by irrelevant comments appearing here, you can avoid them by creating an account for yourself. However, you will still be unable to edit Wikipedia while the IP you are using is blocked.

Please stop adding nonsense to Wikipedia. It is considered vandalism. If you want to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. -- Francs2000 | Talk 22:40, 13 July 2005 (UTC)

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize pages, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Please do any testing here. Nufy8 20:27, 11 August 2005 (UTC)

This is your last warning. The next time you vandalize a page you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia.

Anyone vandalizing George W. Bush will be blocked for up to 48 hours without further warning (according to a note there).

~~~~ ( ! | ? | * ) 20:28, 11 August 2005 (UTC)

Now I know college is fun and all, but do not ever use an article to communicate with each other. There's email or because you are on the same campus, you can even walk over. Please do not vandalise any Wikipedia articles again or there will be longer blocks. Thanks! Sasquatch讲看 20:34, August 11, 2005 (UTC)

Contents

[edit] October 2005

Please stop blanking pages or adding nonsense to Wikipedia. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. Andrew pmk | Talk 23:34, 30 October 2005 (UTC)

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize pages, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. -- Francs2000 00:55, 31 October 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Stress-energy tensor

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize pages, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. ---CH 23:18, 19 December 2005 (UTC)

  1. Thanks for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your test worked, and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. Thanks. Naconkantari e|t||c|m 02:42, 8 March 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Douglas Feith

Please discuss mass deletions in the Talk Page before going ahead willy nilly. Abe Froman 23:07, 21 March 2006 (UTC)

Your recent edit to Islamic Thinkers Society was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to recognize and repair vandalism to Wikipedia articles. If the bot reverted a legitimate edit, please accept our apologies – if you bring it to the attention of the bot's owner, we may be able to improve its behavior. Click here for frequently asked questions about the bot and this warning. // Tawkerbot2 22:25, 5 April 2006 (UTC)

Please be careful not to remove content from Wikipedia without a valid reason, which you should specify in the edit summary or on the article's talk page. Thank you. RexNL 22:38, 18 April 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Reverted edit to Chirakkal Raja

I've reverted your edit to Chirakkal Raja as I was unable to substantiate whether it was fact. Please use {{fact}} after a punctuation point (e.g. full-stops, commas, etc) if you believe the preceding sentence or part-sentence to require a reliable source to back it up, or move it to the article's talk page if you think the statement/sentence to be false detailing your problems with it. Also, when editing, following Wikipedia's Neutral Point of View policy, and backing up edits that could be construed as wrong or unreliable by using citations from reliable sources will help make Wikipedia - and your edits - better, and your contributions may eventually earn you a barn star. If you don't already do so, using edit summaries on your contributions will help other Wikipedians see at a glance what your edit was about. If you're able to neutrally rephrase and reference your edit, please do so. If you think I was wrong in reverting this edit, please contact me on my talk page. Thanks, TheJC TalkContributions 20:19, 24 June 2006 (UTC)

Retrieved from "http://en.wikipedia.org../../../1/2/9/User_talk%7E129.49.7.122.html"