User talk:129.12.200.49

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

You have new messages (last change).

School IP address Attention:

This IP address, 129.12.200.49, is registered to The Computing Laboratory, University of Kent at Canterbury and may be shared by multiple users of an educational institution. In the case of institutions using proxy servers, this IP address may in fact represent many users at many physical computers.

For this reason a message intended for one person may be received by another. Similarly an innocent user may get blocked for another user's vandalism. If you are editing from this address and are frustrated by irrelevant messages, you can avoid them by creating an account for yourself. In some cases you may temporarily be unable to create an account due to efforts to fight vandalism, in which case please read our advice on this situation.

Caution should be used when blocking this IP or reverting its contributions without checking - if a block is needed, administrators should consider a soft block with the template {{schoolblock|optional comment}} as the block reason.

Note: In the event of persistent vandalism, anonymous editing from this IP address may be disabled for up to 6 months at a time while abuse reports may be forwarded to your school administration for investigation in case of long-term abuse by registered users.

Contents

[edit] Warnings

[edit] April 2006

Please do not remove content from Wikipedia; it is considered vandalism. If you want to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. A link to the edit I have reverted can be found here: link. If you believe this edit should not have been reverted, please contact me. Srikeit(talk ¦ ✉) 19:01, 20 April 2006 (UTC)

Your recent edit to Warrington Wolves was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to recognize and repair vandalism to Wikipedia articles. If the bot reverted a legitimate edit, please accept our apologies – if you bring it to the attention of the bot's owner, we may be able to improve its behavior. Click here for frequently asked questions about the bot and this warning. // Tawkerbot2 14:45, 26 April 2006 (UTC)

[edit] May 2006

I would appreciate if your voiced your concerns at Talk:Federal subjects of Russia. In my opinion, the line you are trying to add stands out in the flow of the article, is factually inaccurate, and provides details that would (and should) be better explained elsewhere. I am looking forward to seeing your comments. And, oh, welcome to Wikipedia! Would you consider creating an account (the benefits are numerous), so we could carry discussion more comfortably? Thanks!—Ëzhiki (ërinacëus amurënsis) • (yo?); 16:08, 5 May 2006 (UTC)

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize pages, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. RexNL 23:53, 7 May 2006 (UTC)

This is your last warning. The next time you vandalize a page, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. RexNL 23:56, 7 May 2006 (UTC)

Please refrain from adding nonsense to Wikipedia, as you did to Pedophilia. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. A link to the edit I have reverted can be found here: link. If you believe this edit should not have been reverted, please contact me. Primate#101 00:58, 8 May 2006 (UTC)

This is your last warning. The next time you vandalize a page, as you did to Pedophilia, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. A link to the edit I have reverted can be found here: link. If you believe this edit should not have been reverted, please contact me. Primate#101 01:01, 8 May 2006 (UTC)

This is your last warning. The next time you vandalize a page, as you did to Wikipedia, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. A link to the edit I have reverted can be found here: link. If you believe this edit should not have been reverted, please contact me. Travelbird 11:33, 12 May 2006 (UTC)

Please refrain from adding nonsense to Wikipedia, as you did to Maximum likelihood. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. A link to the edit I have reverted can be found here: link. If you believe this edit should not have been reverted, please contact me. Travelbird 11:34, 12 May 2006 (UTC)

I have reverted a recent edit you made to the article Republics of Russia. You did not provide an edit summary, and I could not determine whether the edit was vandalism or a constructive contribution. In the future, please use edit summaries. A link to the edit I have reverted can be found here: link. If you believe this edit should not have been reverted, please contact me. Xyrael T 15:39, 14 May 2006 (UTC)

You have been blocked from editing Wikipedia for repeated vandalism. If or when the block expires, please refrain from vandalizing or this account will face longer blocks, and action could be taken against the individual who uses it. Syrthiss 17:58, 18 May 2006 (UTC)
Welcome to Wikipedia. We invite everyone to contribute constructively to our encyclopedia. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing. However, unconstructive edits, such as those you made to University of Kent, are considered vandalism. If you continue in this manner you may be blocked from editing without further warning. Please stop, and consider improving rather than damaging the hard work of others. Thanks. Tangotango 12:47, 20 May 2006 (UTC)

[edit] July 2006

Wikipedia is not censored. Please do not remove material from it. Your edit has been reverted. Fiddle Faddle 14:38, 10 July 2006 (UTC)

Welcome to Wikipedia. We invite everyone to contribute constructively to our encyclopedia. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing. However, unconstructive edits, such as those you made to emoticon, are considered vandalism. If you continue in this manner you may be blocked from editing without further warning. Please stop, and consider improving rather than damaging the hard work of others. Thanks. You have now removed the same content twice. I am reverting it as vandalism. Further removal will be reported with a view to an admin cojmsidering you for blocking. Fiddle Faddle 15:10, 10 July 2006 (UTC)

Please see WP:NOT Fiddle Faddle 15:17, 10 July 2006 (UTC)

  • First they are not "my obscenities". Second Wikipedia is not censored. Your censorship is simply because you do not like something. Your edits to emoticon are vandalism and are being reported. Fiddle Faddle 15:34, 10 July 2006 (UTC)
You have been temporarily blocked from editing Wikipedia  for vandalism. Please note that page blanking, addition of random text or spam, deliberate misinformation, privacy violations, and repeated and blatant violation of our neutrality policy are considered vandalism. Your block will expire in 24 hours. If you wish to make useful contributions, you are welcome to come back after the block expires. AmiDaniel (talk) 15:49, 10 July 2006 (UTC)
Upon closer inspection your edits were not vandalism, but a content dispute. I've removed the block; however, please be aware that you are nearly in violation of the three-revert rule, breaking which rule will result in your being blocked. AmiDaniel (talk) 16:01, 10 July 2006 (UTC)

You are in danger of violating the three-revert rule on a page. Please cease further reverts or you may be blocked from further editing. Catamorphism 14:19, 11 July 2006 (UTC)

Please refrain from adding nonsense to Wikipedia, as you did to Camden Town. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. A link to the edit I have reverted can be found here: link. If you believe this edit should not have been reverted, please contact me. --Nishkid64 19:48, 31 July 2006 (UTC)

[edit] August 2006

Please refrain from removing content from Wikipedia, as you did to Brixton. It is considered vandalism. If you want to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. PCEevee talk 20:16, 1 August 2006 (UTC)

[edit] October 2006

Your recent edit to IS/LM model (diff) was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to recognize and repair vandalism to Wikipedia articles. If the bot reverted a legitimate edit, please accept my humble creator's apologies – if you bring it to the attention of the bot's owner, we may be able to improve its behavior. Click here for frequently asked questions about the bot and this warning. // AntiVandalBot 13:38, 24 October 2006 (UTC)

[edit] November 2006

Thank you for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your test worked, and it has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you may want to do. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia.--Chris Griswold (☎☓) 08:00, 3 November 2006 (UTC)

This is your last warning.
The next time you vandalize a page, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Docg 23:13, 18 November 2006 (UTC)

I've nominated the article Krakozhia for deletion under the Articles for deletion process. We appreciate your contributions, but in this particular case I do not feel that Krakozhia satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion. I have explained why in the nomination space (see What Wikipedia is not and Deletion policy). Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Krakozhia. Don't forget to add four tildes (~~~~) at the end of each of your comments to sign them. You are free to edit the content of Krakozhia during the discussion, but please do not remove the "Articles for Deletion" template (the box at the top). Doing so will not end the discussion. —Psychonaut 18:17, 25 November 2006 (UTC)

[edit] December 2006

Please do not add nonsense to Wikipedia, as you did to AC Omonia. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. ♪♫ ĽąĦĩŘǔ ♫♪ Walkie-talkie 12:18, 7 December 2006 (UTC)

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize pages, as you did to AC Omonia, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. ♪♫ ĽąĦĩŘǔ ♫♪ Walkie-talkie 12:19, 7 December 2006 (UTC)

Thank you for experimenting with the page A.C. Milan on Wikipedia. Your test worked, and it has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you may want to do. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. Matthew_hk tc 13:43, 7 December 2006 (UTC)

Please refrain from undoing other people's edits repeatedly, as you are doing in Eastern Orthodox Church. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. At any rate please do not do more than three reverts in a 24h period. Rather than reverting, discuss disputed changes on the talk page. The revision you want is not going to be implemented by edit warring. Thank you. Mrhsj 18:44, 9 December 2006 (UTC)

[edit] February 2007

Please stop. If you continue to vandalise Wikipedia, as you did to Modernism, you will be blocked. Walton monarchist89 17:10, 8 February 2007 (UTC)

Please stop adding nonsense to Wikipedia, as you did to Israel. It is considered vandalism which, under Wikipedia guidelines, can lead to blocks being applied. If you would like to experiment again, please use the sandbox. -- Avi 17:11, 9 February 2007 (UTC)

[edit] March 2007

Please stop. If you continue to vandalise Wikipedia, as you did to Parkwood united, you will be blocked. Jimmybullock 14:17, 09 March 2007 (GMT)

[edit] Faith

Please stop. If you continue to delete or blank page contents or templates from Wikipedia, you will be blocked. Log in and express your concerns on the talk page. Consensus is king at wikipedia, and you are removing material unilaterally. Also, generic templates are next to useless for an article this evolved. If someone contests specific statements or specific sources, use the appropriate tags in the actual article:

Drive-by editors slapping templates on articles are not conducive to actual progress or consensus. Rather than raging against the wiki, why not contribute to the article? - WeniWidiWiki 19:41, 14 February 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Faith

Hello, the defintion of faith given was sourced before your most recent reversion. Since the matter is sourced, I strongly suggest that you discuss the matter on the article's talk page rather than revert. JoshuaZ 19:47, 14 February 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Faith

Please stop. If you continue to delete or blank page contents or templates from Wikipedia, as you did to Faith, you will be blocked. Discuss it on the talk page. Removing material unilaterally will not get "your" version accepted. - WeniWidiWiki 16:35, 15 February 2007 (UTC)

Well apart from your arguments, if you revert faith once more in 24 h, you will be blocked (policy WP:3RR). — Gareth Hughes 17:09, 25 February 2007 (UTC)
Hi, the recent edit you made to Apollo has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thanks – Qxz 12:19, 28 February 2007 (UTC)

[edit] March 21 2007

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize pages, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Bishonen | talk 00:02, 22 March 2007 (UTC).

[edit] 2007-03-28

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to University of Kent, you will be blocked from editing. FJPB 15:09, 28 March 2007 (UTC)
Welcome to Wikipedia. We invite everyone to contribute constructively to our encyclopedia. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing. However, unconstructive edits are considered vandalism and are immediately reverted. If you continue in this manner you may be blocked from editing without further warning. Please stop, and consider improving rather than damaging the work of others. Thank you. Ben W Bell talk 15:20, 28 March 2007 (UTC)
You have been temporarily blocked from editing Wikipedia as a result of your disruptive edits. You are free to make constructive edits after the block has expired, but please note that vandalism (including page blanking or addition of random text), spam, deliberate misinformation, privacy violations, personal attacks; and repeated, blatant violations of our neutral point of view policy will not be tolerated.Ben W Bell talk 15:25, 28 March 2007 (UTC)
Retrieved from "http://en.wikipedia.org../../../1/2/9/User_talk%7E129.12.200.49.html"