User talk:128.250.204.118

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

You have new messages (last change).

Contents

[edit] Your edit to Tony Martin (comedian)

Your recent edit to Tony Martin (comedian) (diff) was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to recognize and repair vandalism to Wikipedia articles. If the bot reverted a legitimate edit, please accept my humble creator's apologies – if you bring it to the attention of the bot's owner, we may be able to improve its behavior. Click here for frequently asked questions about the bot and this warning. // AntiVandalBot 02:19, 3 October 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Regarding your edit to Talk:Impala

It might not have been your intention, but your recent edit removed content from an article. Please be careful not to remove content from Wikipedia without a valid reason, which you should specify in the edit summary or on the article's talk page. Take a look at our welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. ThePointblank 06:33, 16 December 2006 (UTC)

— It was my intention ...why don't you have a look at the "content". You really think

I have to do a report for school on Impalas, and I was a little dissapointed that Wikipedia didn't have more information on an animal so cool like an impala. Actually, I have never heard of impalas before until I started researching for this report. I still wish that there would be more info, though.
Other than that, I think Wikipedia is a great place for information stuff.

was a useful contribution?? Get real. 128.250.204.118 05:55, 18 March 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Regarding your recent edits to 30 different articles

DIV, within the last few days you have made name-change edits to over 30 different articles in Wikipedia in efforts to make them align with IUPAC definitions. Please stop this and wait for consensus on this issue at Talk:Gibbs free energy. Thank you: --Sadi Carnot 20:08, 1 January 2007 (UTC)

Indeed, I have rolled back these edits, and will do so in the future unless there is consensus to the contrary. You should really concentrate on finding uses of the terms "Gibbs energy" and "Helmholz energy" in English-language works to back up your case. Wikipedia is not normative, and, while we usually follow IUPAC and IUPAP nomenclature, on occasions we depart from these rules when there is substantial usage of another form. Physchim62 (talk) 18:39, 2 January 2007 (UTC)

This is a shared IP address. I stand by my edits to Gibbs energy and Helmholtz energy. I am moving the following comments to a higher-level heading. —DIV

[edit] March 2007

Welcome, and thank you for experimenting with the page Audrey Hepburn on Wikipedia. Your test worked, and it has been reverted or removed. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Autocracy 02:22, 9 March 2007 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, please ignore this notice



Please do not add unhelpful and non-constructive information to Wikipedia, as you did to University of Melbourne. Your edits could be considered vandalism, and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. TedFrank 02:22, 9 March 2007 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, please ignore this notice

{{subst:vandal4|Dilmah}} --Yamla 05:09, 8 April 2007 (UTC)

Retrieved from "http://en.wikipedia.org../../../1/2/8/User_talk%7E128.250.204.118.html"