User talk:128.243.220.21

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Image:Info-pictogram.png Attention:

This IP address, 128.243.220.21, is registered to University of Nottingham, United Kingdom and is shared by multiple users. Comments left on this page may be received by other users of this IP and appear to be irrelevant. Caution should be used when blocking this IP or reverting its contributions without checking. In the event of vandalism from this address, efforts will be made to contact University of Nottingham, United Kingdom to report abuse.

If you are an unregistered user operating from this address, note that this need not necessarily be the IP address of your machine. In many cases, it turns out to be the IP address of a proxy server that communicates between your browser and the Wikimedia servers. Such proxies are shared among a huge number of users compared to the number of persons using your particular machine. If you are frustrated by irrelevant comments appearing here, you can avoid them by creating an account for yourself. However, you will still be unable to edit Wikipedia while the IP you are using is blocked.

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize pages, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. — Dan | Talk 04:06, May 28, 2005 (UTC)


Are you posh Ben, morose Ben, uni Ben or the other Ben? Deb 21:29, 8 Jun 2005 (UTC)


Thanks for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your test worked, and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. Thanks. Lectonar 09:18, 4 October 2005 (UTC)

This message is regarding the page 1960s. Please refrain from adding nonsense to Wikipedia. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. --Nlu 23:01, 26 October 2005 (UTC)

Contents

[edit] Adam Cox

I have placed a tag on the article Adam Cox, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. I did this because the article seems to be a biographical account about a person but it does not indicate how or why that person is notable. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag, under any circumstances. If you can indicate why Adam Cox is really notable, I advise you to edit the article promptly, and also put a note on Talk:Adam Cox. Any admin should check for such edits before deleting the article. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. You might also want to read our criteria for speedy deletion, particularly item 7 under Articles. DES (talk) 16:42, 8 November 2005 (UTC)

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize pages, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Jasmol 21:47, 9 November 2005 (UTC)

[edit] December 4

This message is regarding the page Miss Havisham. Please refrain from adding nonsense to Wikipedia. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. -- pgk(talk) 15:22, 4 December 2005 (UTC)

[edit] War of the Pacific

Why did you remove the comment regarding el Diario? I'm temporarily reverting the change until a justification is provided. Primetime 15:26, 16 December 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Bin Laden

Please don't blank, thanks! Tawker 00:55, 14 February 2006 (UTC)

  1. Please stop removing content from Wikipedia; it is considered vandalism. If you want to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Naconkantari e|t||c|m 22:59, 20 February 2006 (UTC)

[edit] 20 April

Please do not add commercial links (or links to your own private websites) to Wikipedia. Wikipedia is not a vehicle for advertising or a mere collection of external links. You are, however, encouraged to add content instead of links to the encyclopedia. See the welcome page to learn more. Thanks. -- malo (tlk) (cntrbtns) 13:57, 20 April 2006 (UTC)

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize pages, as you did to Pearl Jam, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. A link to the edit I have reverted can be found here: link. If you believe this edit should not have been reverted, please contact me. Dlohcierekim 14:10, 2 May 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Your edit to Ferns

Your recent edit to Ferns was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to recognize and repair vandalism to Wikipedia articles. If the bot reverted a legitimate edit, please accept my humble creator's apologies – if you bring it to the attention of the bot's owner, we may be able to improve its behavior. Click here for frequently asked questions about the bot and this warning. // Tawkerbot2 13:27, 17 May 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Your edit to Louis Dorman

Your recent edit to Louis Dorman was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to recognize and repair vandalism to Wikipedia articles. If the bot reverted a legitimate edit, please accept my humble creator's apologies – if you bring it to the attention of the bot's owner, we may be able to improve its behavior. Click here for frequently asked questions about the bot and this warning. // Tawkerbot2 21:22, 19 May 2006 (UTC)

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize pages, as you did to Louis Dorman, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. A link to the edit I have reverted can be found here: link. If you believe this edit should not have been reverted, please contact me. Alphachimp talk 21:24, 19 May 2006 (UTC)

This is your last warning. The next time you vandalize a page, as you did to Paleolithic, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. A link to the edit I have reverted can be found here: link. If you believe this edit should not have been reverted, please contact me. Anonymous__Anonymous 10:02, 27 June 2006 (UTC)

Thank you for experimenting with the page List of big-bust models and performers on Wikipedia. Your test worked, and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. A link to the edit I have reverted can be found here: link. If you believe this edit should not have been reverted, please contact me. Dina 12:43, 18 August 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Re: speedy delete tags on James joiner

Please stop removing speedy deletion notices from articles that you have created yourself. You may place {{hangon}} on the page and make your case on the article's talk page if you oppose an article's speedy deletion. Thanks. Johnbrownsbody 11:28, 19 October 2006 (UTC)


==Re: your edits to University of Nottingham Halls of Residence

This is your last warning.
The next time you vandalize a page, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Johnbrownsbody 11:30, 19 October 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Nov 2006

Please do not add nonsense to Wikipedia, as you did to Titanium. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. NawlinWiki 19:57, 7 November 2006 (UTC)

Thank you for experimenting with the page Downside School on Wikipedia. Your test worked, and it has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you may want to do. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. A link to the edit I have reverted can be found here: link. If you believe this edit should not have been reverted, please contact me. amitch (talk) 12:02, 30 November 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Dec 2006

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize pages, as you did to 2006 Suffolk serial killer investigation, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia.

[edit] March 2007

Please do not add unhelpful and non-constructive information to Wikipedia, as you did to Malcolm Nash. Your edits could be considered vandalism, and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. --Anna512 (talk) 10:09, 2 March 2007 (UTC)

I respectfully disagree that the changes made to Malcolm Nash by an editor from this IP address were either unhelpful or non-constructive. The editor added properly sourced references and some useful material. I have left a message on Anna512's talk page asking her to think again. Bencherlite 10:21, 2 March 2007 (UTC)
I have reverted my changes and apologise for the inconvenience. It seems I was somewhat careless, and will immediately check my other actions today for more mistakes. --Anna512 (talk) 10:24, 2 March 2007 (UTC)