User talk:12.72.69.26

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

You have new messages (last change).

75.13.99.82 wanted me to correct the incorrect information on her page. 132.241.246.111 03:44, 7 September 2006 (UTC)

No, 75.13.99.82 asked an administrator to investigate the charge, and remove the notice box and categorization when 75.13.99.82 was exonerated. 75.13.99.82 of course could have blanked User talk:75.13.99.82 himself or herself, if that was what was desired. You could have simply withdrawn your categorization, and modified or removed the notice box. Instead, you went further to delete the clear explanation of why it is unreasonable to believe that 75.13.99.82 is [Category:Suspected Wikipedia sockpuppets of Grazon|a suspected sock puppet of Grazon]]. Your original purpose in the categorization was vandalistic confusion of the issue of who is genuinely [Category:Suspected Wikipedia sockpuppets of Grazon|a suspected sock puppet of Grazon], which lends further credence to the notion that you are one of his sock puppets. —12.72.69.26 03:54, 7 September 2006 (UTC)
Well excuse me for trying to correct the situation. 132.241.246.111 03:57, 7 September 2006 (UTC)
You're trying to white-wash what you've done, as you fear that you might actually provoke the administrators to block you again. —12.72.69.26 03:59, 7 September 2006 (UTC)
There is no way to white-wash on Wikipedia. 132.241.246.111 04:01, 7 September 2006 (UTC)
Except insofar as busy-or-lazy investigators might not appropriately investigate histories, just as you hope. —12.72.69.26 04:03, 7 September 2006 (UTC)
Wow now you can read my mind? 132.241.246.111 04:06, 7 September 2006 (UTC)
It is small and transparent. —12.72.69.26 04:07, 7 September 2006 (UTC)
Keep up the personal attack no doubt that will help convince the admin. to ban me. 132.241.246.111 04:09, 7 September 2006 (UTC)
Presumably, regardless of whether they object to my reciprocation here of your personal attacks agaisnt me elsewhere, they will judege you by your deeds. —12.72.69.26 04:12, 7 September 2006 (UTC)
Considering how often your IP address changes that would be hard even to try to prove unless you wanted to provide them with evidence of how often you've stalked me and attacked me without reason. 132.241.246.111 04:14, 7 September 2006 (UTC)
Any personal attacks against you — just as any personal attacks by you — are traceable by way of your history. No one here has been subjected to an evaporating attack. The closest thing to that was your page-blanking of your attacks on User talk:75.13.99.82, which failed utterly. —12.72.69.26 04:21, 7 September 2006 (UTC)
You think that was an attack? lol 132.241.246.111 04:26, 7 September 2006 (UTC)
The page-blanking was not the attack per se. (The attacks were the willfully bogus claim that 75.13.99.82 might be a sock puppet of Grazon, and the editting of a typo into a comment by 75.13.99.82.) The page-blanking was the attempt to hide the attack. —12.72.69.26 04:31, 7 September 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Caution

Please refrain from undoing other people's edits repeatedly, as you are doing in Timothy McVeigh. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia under the three-revert rule, which states that nobody may revert a single page more than three times in 24 hours. (Note: this also means editing the page to reinsert an old edit. If the effect of your actions is to revert back, it qualifies as a revert.) Thank you. --jpgordon∇∆∇∆ 04:10, 7 September 2006 (UTC)

Good point. TNX! —12.72.69.26 04:13, 7 September 2006 (UTC)
Retrieved from "http://en.wikipedia.org../../../1/2/2E/User_talk%7E12.72.69.26.html"