User talk:12.10.219.37

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

You have new messages (last change).

Thanks for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your test worked, and has been removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. Thanks.

Please do not replace Wikipedia pages with blank content. Blank pages are harmful to Wikipedia because they have a tendency to confuse readers. If it is a duplicate article, please redirect it to an appropriate existing page. If the page has been vandalised, please revert it to the last legitimate version. If you feel that the content of a page is inappropriate, please edit the page and replace it with appropriate content. If you believe there is no hope for the page, please see the deletion policy for how to proceed. Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia! -- Alf melmac 23:02, 5 December 2005 (UTC)

==SONET I am not vandalising these pages, nor are any of the other musicians who have been posting content about the Goldman band. The musicians of the Goldman Band, some of whom have been with the band for nearly half a century, unanimously believe that the band was destroyed by incompetent leadership. This is part of the band's actual history. Please do not revert the page.

Contents

[edit] Babri Mosque

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize pages, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Owen× ☎ 23:03, 5 December 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Goldman Band

Please do not keep undoing other people's edits without discussing them first. This is considered impolite and unproductive. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia under the three-revert rule, which states that nobody may revert an article to a previous version more than three times in 24 hours. (Note: this also means editing the page to reinsert an old edit. If the effect of your actions is to revert back, it qualifies as a revert.) Thank you. Jkelly 16:26, 15 December 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Goldman Band

Daniel Costello: I have no need to hide behind an IP address. However, I see no reason to utilize a nym nor, of course, a meatspace name. An IP address is in some cases more identification than any of those things awayway. In any event my meatspace name would mean nothing to you: I am not a member of the band, nor am I even a musician. I have watched Goldman concerts for approximately 35 years and watched what happened when Force & Wiljelm took over.

As for "Political Objectives", the demise of the Goldman Band is a fact, not politics. The decline in attendence numbers and funding are facts, not politics. Just because you don't like the actual history (and how it relates to the leadership of the Goldman Band) doesn't mean it's politcal. Or rather, just because its politcal doesn't mean it's not history.

If you're still desparate for a nym or Reputation, see my wiki entry on SONET, otherwise known as the Synchronous Optical Network. I'd be curious to see what other entries you have written.

Dear 12.10.219.37,

Obviously you, who only refers to him or herself as "most members of the band", still does not want to identify him or herself. At the same time, I have been accused of hiding behind an IP address, where indeed I have openly stated my name in each discussion.

I have edited out any mention of Chris Wilhjelm due to your polemics. Please refrain from reverting this article because you feel the need to reach your own political objectives. That is surely not the goal of Wikipedia.

Sincerely, Daniel Costello

PS. No, we've probably never met. (although I cannot be certain, since you refuse to identify yourself)I along with at least one of the administrators of Wikipedia have been editing this article and editing your reverts.

Retrieved from "http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Goldman_Band"

[edit] Steve Nash

Thank you for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your test worked, and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. --Downwards 22:56, 4 May 2006 (UTC)


Welcome to Wikipedia! We could really use your help to create new content, but your recent additions to 1988 are considered non-notable and have been reverted or removed. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. --DDG 22:00, 1 June 2006 (UTC)

Some of the people, places or things you have written about in the article Upsilon Sigma Phi may not be sufficiently well-known to merit articles of their own. The Wikipedia community welcomes newcomers, and encourages them to become Wikipedians. On Wikipedia, all users are entitled to a user page in which they can describe themselves, and this article's content may be incorporated into that page. However, to merit inclusion in the encyclopedia proper, a subject must be notable. We encourage you to write or improve articles on notable subjects. A link to the edit I have reverted can be found here: link. If you believe this edit should not have been reverted, please contact me. Alphachimp talk 02:25, 14 July 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Good faith

It is quite possible that you have gratefully accepted dyslexia as a catch-all apologetic diagnosis for your poor education. Therefore, I'm assuming good faith in your edit of Shoreham-by-Sea and won't be issuing a vandalism warning this time. Perhaps consider your self-appointed role as a copy editor for the article to have been another one of your poor life choices, and let those inherently more qualified to assess the application of Bs and Ds make the call in the future. Thank you. ◄ИΞШSΜΛЯΞ► 23:21, 19 September 2006 (UTC)

Retrieved from "http://en.wikipedia.org../../../1/2/2E/User_talk%7E12.10.219.37.html"