Talk:Čedomir Jovanović

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This article must adhere to the policy on biographies of living persons. Controversial material of any kind that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately, especially if potentially libelous. If such material is repeatedly inserted or there are other concerns relative to this policy, report it on the living persons biographies noticeboard.

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography. For more information, visit the project page.	Biography Portal
GA	This article has been rated as GA-Class on the Project's quality scale. [FAQ] (If you rated the article, please give a short summary at comments to explain the ratings and/or to identify the strengths and weaknesses.)
	This article is supported by the Politics and government work group.

I think that section of this article about Cedomir Jovanovic and Mafia is misleading and should be updated to conform with NPO guidelines. His statement has been put out of context and government as a whole was accused for cooperating with organized crime. I think that that paragraph should be deleted or changed to reflect both sides. At present it alleges only one side of the story.

I did not write that he WAS mafia, I wrote that he was meeting them, presumably on behalf of the government. Which he did said he was. What's the problem there? Please, read the paragraph again, it does say that he was accused of actually being involved with them, but it does not that he was. I will reword it anyway, but seriously, read that paragraph again, before you make any more POV accusations. --Dejan Cabrilo 16:00, 11 Feb 2005 (UTC)

I am sorry to reply again, but I modified the paragraph, to make sure that presumably who had contacts with mafia in order to curb them. What was exactly POV about that paragraph? He did have contacts ("my hands are dirty, but my consciousness is clear"), and he said so. Was he giving them any favors or just making sure that mafia stays out of politics or whatnot - we really don't know (I am sure it's the other thing, but we cannot prove it). So the article simply says that he was accused of giving them favors, and it says that Jovanovic denied this. If you wish, add stuff about him passing the lie-detector (I just don't know much about it, so I didn't mention it), but don't just remove it. Now please, READ the paragraph before you delete it again! --Dejan Cabrilo 16:12, 11 Feb 2005 (UTC)

I did not delete it. My username is Trigor while it was deleted by mr. Pokrajac who I belive only agrees with me to some point. I do believe it should be changed and I am pleased with correction. I have read it several times and I do believe that there should be more info added. There was assembly hearing of Jovanocih. I will search for more statements to put them online and that will in turn ,I believe, present more objective picture. I personally do not believe in forced deletion of article. I prefer POV sign. It left me to believe after first reading that he was dealing with mafia and that he was gangster himself. I sincerely believe that article was POV assumption. You have now mention what he said were reasons behind visit and I believe article in present form to be more accurate than previous version. TRIGOR

Why that part about that being outrageous move? It is a bit POV. Thanks for deleting it.

Until I don't see some evidence I will keep reverting it. So if you want it to stay find some evidence that he is a gipsy.--Trigor 05:18, 17 October 2006 (UTC)

I couldn't care less. --estavisti 11:47, 17 October 2006 (UTC)

No. It is not problem with that, but with out any facts I don't think it is vise to put it. If you don't have any sources it is bad idea to put this. I will request protection.--Trigor 04:52, 25 October 2006 (UTC)

I really couldn't care less about that fucker Cheda. What's annoying me is your Romaphobia. However, if you don't want it in the article, I don't have the time to argue for it. --estavisti 05:10, 25 October 2006 (UTC)