Talk:( )
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Contents |
[edit] Album name
how is the name meant to be pronounced? -- Tarquin 14:59 17 May 2003 (UTC)
- As " ", of course. How else?
- I've heard it called "Parentheses". Omphaloscope 5 July 2005 14:57 (UTC)
- I've always just called it "the untitled CD" or "their untitled CD"
- I've heard it called "Parentheses". Omphaloscope 5 July 2005 14:57 (UTC)
"Brackets", "Parenthesis", "Untitled Album" or just nothing at all (just a gap while speaking) Fantom 22:35, 22 December 2005 (UTC)
[edit] "The Spy Machine"
What is "The Spy Machine"? -leigh (φθόγγος) 20:35, Dec 9, 2004 (UTC)
- Yeah I also want to know where that came from. -ZepAn
- "The Spy Machine" is what "Njósnavélin" means. "The Nothing Song" is an alternate title for this track.
- Yeah but where have people got these names from seeing as all the tracks are officially untitled?
[edit] Differant variants?
Should we add some information on the differant variants of the album: like the fact that the EU, US, Japanese, and Aussie releases each got a differant coverart? Also, Iceland didn't get any unique coverart, but all four releases were actually sold there commercially. There was also a 2002/03 Spanish pressing by Karonte which had the album housed in a digibook with 94 (!) pages of contempery art.
There is a link to the Spanish Version here. http://www.popplagid.com/graphics/CDbook1.htm Endlessmug 14:07, 1 November 2006 (UTC)
[edit] <^>v!!This album is connected!!v<^>
- All song titles serve as redirects to this album, have their own pages, or have been placed at the appropriate disambiguation pages.--Hraefen Talk 20:43, 10 August 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Mogwai Itunes Tracklisting
Is it just me who finds the “fake” track listing on iTunes to be completely irrelevant to the album page? I think giving just the real track names is sufficient enough. Endlessmug 14:20, 1 November 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Album written while touring AB
All the songs in ( ) were being developed during their Ágætis byrjun tour. By the time they were recording these songs in the studio for a release, the band had played them MANY times before. Endlessmug 14:20, 1 November 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Vonlenska
All the mention of the English interpretations of the Vonlenska should be on the Vonlenska page only I think. It just seems to be a little irrelevant being there is no true interpretation. Endlessmug 14:20, 1 November 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Requested move
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was Move Duja► 10:12, 13 December 2006 (UTC)
( ) (album) → ( ) — Petition to move back the page to its original location. I do not feel that a distinct disambiguation page is necessary; the ( ) (album) page already had a link on the top to ( ) (film). The album sold half a million copies. 74.109.173.23 00:52, 5 December 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Survey
- Add * '''Support''' or * '''Oppose''' on a new line followed by a brief explanation, then sign your opinion using ~~~~.
- Support The film is borderline non-notable. – Anþony talk 11:25, 5 December 2006 (UTC)
- Who cares? If that article is deleted due to non-notability, then move the album to (). -- Kicking222 00:16, 6 December 2006 (UTC)
- Oppose () is a completely valid disambiguation. There's no reason for the move. -- Kicking222 00:16, 6 December 2006 (UTC)
- Do you think that Toronto (disambiguation) should be where Toronto is now? If not, this is the same case: people are much more likely to be looking for the album, and we're introducing an unnecessary click for them. --74.109.173.23 00:49, 6 December 2006 (UTC)
- See WP:D#Primary topic. When one topic is significantly more likely to be searched for than other uses, it gets the name. – Anþony talk 05:15, 6 December 2006 (UTC)
- Support. Although there has as yet appeared no evidence that the film title was in any way derived from the album, the album is far more widely known and appeared first, and is IMO the primary meaning. Andrewa 11:09, 9 December 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Discussion
- Add any additional comments:
As an aside, I notice that all of the references are from the band itself, yet there are four independent reviews. You should be relying on those primarily, not information from the band. – Anþony talk 11:27, 5 December 2006 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.