User talk:Zpb52

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

• User talk:Zpb52/Archive1

[edit] Recent User edit

Whoops! I forgot to sign in. Sorry. --—The preceding unsigned comment was added by 59.92.62.97 (talk • contribs).

[edit] Re: Please Use Edit Summaries

I try but it's sometimes hard to know what to put in them :( Sweetie Petie 12:45, 13 May 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Regarding Revision of supposed vandalism to Kellie Pickler article.

You said that I should have used an edit summary on the Kellie Pickler article. In fact I did use the edit summary to provide a valid reason for deleting unsourced, unverified rumors and original reasearch, you then reverted my changes as vandalism. Please explain to me how deleting rumors is vandalism. Batman2005 17:22, 13 May 2006 (UTC)

No worries, i actually didn't see that I had cut off the sentence half way through. My mistake on that. Batman2005 17:27, 13 May 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Thanks

Thanks for reverting me on User talk:AmiDaniel/VandalProof. I didn't know what that button would do. BrokenSegue 17:52, 13 May 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Speedy Delete

I think you need to take the speedy delete off since the only ground you had for putting it up (duplicated info) is no longer valid. Zzz345zzz 18:08, 13 May 2006 (UTC)

[edit] This edit

It was legit, I restored it. Thanks for looking out. TacoDeposit 20:18, 13 May 2006 (UTC)

[edit] SKeep, etc. templates

I'm not sure about using the funky symbols, but if you remove the templates entirely, a lot of AfD discussions are going to look really odd. Just an opinion. Fan1967 00:20, 14 May 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Zack -Speedy Delete happy or what

Zack, you know, I went back to each of the sites you decided to speedy delete and all my hard work was gone. I'd prefer to have been pointed out by you what you didn't dig and how to cure which logically could have been just a couple omitions I would think.

Can you restore your dasterdly destructive work and have a little dialog with me here? I read in the Wiki Speedy Delete verbiage that you admin type are suposed to excersize a little more understanding "even you were once new at this".

Help me out here bro.

1. Wiki is completely ignorant of what an ICP is. Try looking it up and you get the Insane Clown Posse, COMPLETE WITH A LINK TO THEIR SITE and links to buy their albums etc. What's up with that. You zapped me for having a link back to my self because I AM AN ICP (Independent Content Provider)

Explain how an artist with a link to his page is different some how... I'm listening???

2. Shared Media Licensing, Inc - SML - is also proving Wiki's ignorance. Everything I posted up was factual information INFORMATION which is what Wiki's suposed to be all about. Maybe I screwed up in 3 out of 70 words there or something but come on I cannot even correct it since nothing I wrote is there now. How about restoring it and telling me what you didn't dig. By the way, I'm and ICP - FOR - SML, I'm NOT SML... so any link in the 411 I posted to them benefits me NOTTA ZIP NO WAY NO HOW.

3. CSR Radio - you have other online streaming audio radio stations listed which describe themselve and point to themselves... what the heck was the issue with what I listed.

4. Chemistry Set Records - description of what it is (ICP for Weedshare, promoter of independent artists, etc.) with links to my sites. Other businesses are described and have links to their site - SO WHAT SPECIFICALLY did you not like man? Let's FIX instead of BLOW INTO OBLIVIAN my work here ok?

Thanks in advance for your reply. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by ChemSet (talk • contribs).

Hi there, Zack - Kind of stumbled upon this situation by accident, and I'm hoping to shed a bit of light. I wanted to remind you that it is good practice to begin discussion with an editor of a given questionable page before nominating it for speedy deletion. As an alternative method, if the pages were questionable, but in good faith by a new editor you could have gone through the proposed deletion process or even the regular AfD process. Communication has really been lacking around the project, and the loss of any well-faithed editor is a severe pain in my side. I really would like to remind you to assume good faith when dealing with new editors and new pages. Even if the article isn't notable for the Wikipedia, it should be explained without WikiJargon well before you take decisive action. You were certainly right on his talk page to refer him to an admin; lets also take more responsibility in welcoming newcomers and making their experience accessible and managable. Hope you understand that this whole comment is in good tone and mere reflection. Happy editing, Wes! • ^T_c 08:17, 16 May 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Thanks

Thanks for reverting vandalism on my user page a few days ago. By the way, you might be interested in helping out with WikiProject Country Music. We're just getting started, and we're desperate for membership. And it looks like you've done some great work on some articles related to Nashville. Thanks, again.--TantalumTelluride^♪ 21:12, 15 May 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Flaws in VandalProof?

I just discovered that some of the vandalism to my talk page by 24.15.61.184 (talk • contribs) didn't actually get reverted. I'm folding in the corrections along with other changes, but I thought you would want to know; if the tool is unreliable, it's best if bugs get reported early... -- Antaeus Feldspar 23:36, 15 May 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Concerns about your VP Use

I hate to drop all of this on you in the midst of your RfA; however, User:Stifle has echoed some concerns about your usage of WP:VandalProof. As I stated on your RfA, this is the first I've even heard of any problems you've been having, and I would have much preferred receiving a message if there bugs or problems that I needed to address. I feel that some of your edits are of great concern, and I would appreciate if you could comment on User talk:AmiDaniel/VP/Abuse and specifically address the diffs provided by Stifle. I'd also like to ask that if you have similar problems in the future, you leave a note either on my talk page or one of VandalProof's talk page so that I can get to the bottom of what went wrong. Thanks. AmiDaniel (talk) 19:26, 16 May 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Your comments to me about the article for WGFX

Since I am a new user, I had trouble figuring out how to reply to you. Hopefully, this is how it's done.

I didn't understand what the red font was about. I thought it was just a format error, and I was only making it consistent. That was my mistake. So, I'll give you that one.

However, I did not remove WHIN and was fully aware that those calls were on 104.5 in the first month of its existence. I only eliminated the 'FM' part since it seems unnecessary, and the other call letters in the article aren't formatted that way. 'FM' isn't really part of the calls.

Stevenmcintosh 23:53, 17 May 2006 (UTC)stevenmcintosh

[edit] Your comments about WGFX

104.5 changed to "104.5 The Fox" in the summer of 1987. You readded KX 104 for years 1987 to 1988 after I deleted it. Sorry, but you are incorrect. You are not all-knowing like you seem to think.

As far as changing "Kix" back to "Kicks", WHIN-"FM", and your other snide comments about being inconvenienced over me not using the preview feature and not understanding policy and tactics, if you're going to sweat relatively small stuff like that, criticize, and basically take away any work I have done, then I can just totally stop making contributions to Wikipedia. It isn't like I'm getting anything for it anyway.

Grow up! You are being very petty. Notice that I didn't change the other stuff back because it isn't that pertinent, technically isn't incorrect, and is open to interpretation.

Based on some of the other comments on your discussion tab, it appears to me that you have a number of other people biting their tongue and holding back. I certainly hope that they don't make you an administrator because you definitely don't have any tact.

09:05, 18 May 2006 (UTC)stevenmcintosh signing off for good and making no further contributions to any Wikipedia article

[edit] Test4 and WP:AIV

Yes sorry, for some reason I didn't notice there were two test4s I only saw the second. My mistake, sorry!—The preceding unsigned comment was added by Prodego (talk • contribs).

[edit] grrr

oi, stop deleting my comments!

[edit] Request for Adminship

It is my regretful task to inform you that your recent request for adminship failed to achieve consensus to promote, and has been closed. Please do not be discouraged; a number of users have had their first RfA end without consensus, but have been promoted overwhelmingly in a later request. Please continue to make outstanding contributions to Wikipedia, and consider requesting adminship again in the future. You may find Wikipedia:Guide to requests for adminship helpful in deciding when to consider running again. If I can be of any help to you, please do not hesitate to ask. Essjay (Talk • Connect) 03:15, 19 May 2006 (UTC)

Regarding my vote change on your RfA from support to oppose... it was a reluctant one, believe me. To explain in more detail, the thing that tipped the scales for me wasn't so much the misplaced templates in and of themselves. You're right; mistakes happen, and I've had a few template errors myself. It was more the unfamiliarity shown when templates were added to well-known admins and bots, such as Freakofnurture and Tawkerbot... I would want an admin to show a little more familiarity in recognizing other users; if not through personal interaction, then perhaps by examining their contributions and realizing that they're not actually vandals. What I should have added to my vote, however, was that I intend to support your RfA next time around, barring any unexpected changes in course. I'd think that in a month's time, give or take, with some more experience, those issues will be put to rest and you'll be given the mop and bucket. Let me know if I can do anything to help in the meantime. Tijuana Brass^¡Épa!-E@ 20:10, 21 May 2006 (UTC)

[edit] saying HELLO!

Born and raised in Nashville, I ran across your page while being deleted by Kungfuadam (!!) and saw your thanks on his talk, followed the link....yada yada... Just noticed your article, and all your work. Couldn't help but notice the first is from Gaylord (owner of all downtown) Entertainment. My wife and I were married nearby at the mansion and the had our reception at the hotel and then a day at the now-gone park for all. Good memories. Anyway... --cpswarrior 03:36, 19 May 2006 (UTC)

• Well I forgot this important little set of facts... I have a BFA from MTSU! (hint-further reading of one's user page helps me learn!) and we seem to have lots in common from there. I rebuilt my first engine (hobby) in Mt Juliet! Give me a min I will remember the road. :) cpswarrior 03:41, 19 May 2006 (UTC)

[edit] please don't keep delete/vendalise people's provided details

http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v377/tccn/KwoneSangWoo.jpg

read this, it's his real passport though he has to renew this yr 3 may

I am a fan of KSW, I know more than your info has.

he really has a girl in 1998 surname Li.

his father die when he is 8 is not fake.

I am his asian fan , i have more details of kwone than your wikipedia had.

i don't know why adding correct details is being called spamming?

if your pedia has, do I have to add mine?

your page is opened for people to change what they got from kwone sang woo, but you all just change back from your own fav. words. then why ask ppl to change?

why not just close your own door and change all your own...?

I don't like your staff's way of treating changes. you don't know, doesnt mean nobody knows kwone's other details that your page doesn't have.

please open all your brain, and heart to receive others' real details.

if you still think that, only your provided details (only by Wiki staff but public people must provide wrong fake details) is true and correct, then why ask people to show their known correct true details?

don't forget that, nobody is 100% perfect. you may be good by make this page, but not receive/listen to people's changes is still your weakness.

at least, I can tell you that, USA people really know not much about kwone. if you still think that you are correct, then I really have nothing to say, but too arrogant will only arouse hatred from others.

If you still think, only you staff give correct details, why not just shut your doors from receive others' changes? because you are just same as not listening to people!

[edit] Your edits

I agree with the previous user. Why on Earth did you delete the category from Caldorwards4's user page? I saw no reason at all for you to revert my edit! Marcus 16:05, 20 May 2006 (UTC)

Oh, now I can see. I'm so sorry. That must have been a mistake edit. I didn't mean to do vandalism. Marcus 16:09, 20 May 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Image Tagging Image:NancyODell.jpg

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:NancyODell.jpg. I notice the 'image' page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then there needs to be an argument why we have the right to use the media on Wikipedia (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then it needs to be specified where it was found, i.e., in most cases link to the website where it was taken from, and the terms of use for content from that page.

If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag then one should be added. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media qualifies as fair use, consider reading fair use, and then use a tag such as {{fairusein|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair_use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other media, consider checking that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. cholmes75 (chit chat) 00:27, 21 May 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Jeff Gordon, and hey...

Saw your comment about locking Jeff Gordon and decided to check out your userpage. I'm in Nashville, too. I see we've worked on a lot of the same articles (and have some similar interests too). I just wanted to tell you to keep fighting the vandals and the fandals. I'm for ya! Maybe we'll meet in person some day. -- Tom (aka Iamvered 09:14, 23 May 2006 (UTC))

[edit] Edit Summary

Please don't hide large edits under the pretext of "Pop up" fixed. It comes across as vandalism. Remember, don't abuse your good faith.Scribner 03:25, 24 May 2006 (UTC)

• Note: The article in question is First Tennessee Bank. Scribner (talk • contribs • logs) had added several POV statements and I merely reverted them. --Zpb52 22:45, 24 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Re: Note Here's the specific edit: here And here is your Edit Summary: (Revert to revision 45433477 using popups) The POV came from the author I cited. Scribner 02:13, 25 May 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Blockhead Deletion

Hold on, you said my article is schedueled for deletion, why is that? I went on it and there is no objectionible things and no headline telling me what's wrong. And I am trying to clean it up the best I can. Thanx. D-hyo 13:39, 30 May 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Vandal

Hello. Recently you warned 69.161.103.33 about vandalizing the Catapult article. Well, he just did a very serious job on that article, and a gave him a final warning. Will you block him if he does it again? Thank you, Thetruthbelow^(talk) 05:37, 1 June 2006 (UTC)

My bad, I thought you were an admin. I know about the process for blocking, but since I thought you were an admin and had previously warned him, you could block him. Sorry about that, Thetruthbelow^(talk) 05:42, 1 June 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Edit to Nil

My edit to the Nil programming language page seemed legit to me, seeing as it is an actual wikipedia article and not a BJAODN page. I'm sorry if I was wrong, but I didn't see the point of the joke alert either. 64.111.128.11 01:14, 2 June 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Gameshow Marathon

Please explain why you chose to move Game$how Marathon to Gameshow Marathon. The dollar sign is part of the title. --Zpb52 02:13, 2 June 2006 (UTC)

No, it isn't. It's part of the stylized logo. Every official textual reference to the program (in the closing credits, at the CBS website, in all promotional materials, etc.) uses the spelling "Gameshow Marathon." A Google search for "gameshow marathon" yields more than 77,000 results, compared to zero results for "game$how marathon." What led you to believe that the latter was the official spelling? —David Levy 02:41, 2 June 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Duplicate link

I removed the second link from the Service Merchandise page because it served as a duplicate link to the one in the info box. I will revert to my edit ASAP. Thanks. NoseNuggets 2:57 PM US EDT June 2 2006

As for the 1934 founding reference, I added a note that the internet site was restarted in 2004, as per the story in the main text. NoseNuggets 11:40 PM US EDT June 2 2006

[edit] Serbs

Those are sourceless estimates, per precedent on such pages unless population numbers have explicit sources they are to be removed. We can't have anyone going around making up population numbers. 72.144.191.106 06:44, 3 June 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Parramatta Ferry colour

You put a speedy delete on my Template:Parramatta Ferry colour. This is linked to a table that I'm building and you can see this at Circular Quay ferry wharf, Sydney at the bottom o fthe page. The tag you slapped on my table now stuffs up the table completely. I'm going to delete it - I hope that's ok! (JROBBO 07:03, 3 June 2006 (UTC))

[edit] AIV

Can you check WP:AIV and block this guy I have listed? He's causing me holy hell. --Zpb52 07:04, 3 June 2006 (UTC)

Thanks, but it looks like RasputinAXP beat you to it by about a minute and gave him a 29-day-longer block for racism. Did your 24-hour block override the 1-month block? If so, can you reinstate it? Thanks. Sorry to be a bother. --Zpb52 07:08, 3 June 2006 (UTC)

It should be fine now. Regards,  (aeropagitica)  (talk)  07:14, 3 June 2006 (UTC)

[edit] What is wrong with you

I am trying tto contribute my interpretation of poem tha is thruly work of art. And since it is discribing my homeland i feel i have right to interpret it as i see it and to correct those i feel are missinterpreting it.

Instead of being glad that i am contributing you direct me to page where you call me names... Well f... you to Zpb52 —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 212.235.176.56 (talk • contribs).

[edit] Nickelodeon stub

The Nickelodeon stub template had been deleted before, after a vote on Templates for deletion. Someone re-created the template and I deleted it; after that I removed references to it from articles. The article's still a perfectly fine stub, though. :) —tregoweth (talk) 03:32, 5 June 2006 (UTC)

[edit] You should be banned

What is wrong with you? My edits at User:JamieAdams were in no way vandalism, I was reverting a nonexplanatory edit by a previous editor. Stop accusing me and threatening a block based on your nonsensical POV. — CRAZY`(IN)`SANE 04:36, 6 June 2006 (UTC)

[edit] You are "Nonsense"

You need to explain to me how changing the order at the beginning of an article (as what I did with Kelly Rowland) is "Vandalism"...Mr. Watchdog! By the way, I will make the same change to the Kelly Rowland Page AGAIN!

JSmith9579 13:33 (EDT) 7 June 2006

[edit] Just Following Your Example

Just Following your Example

JSmith9579 17:47 (EDT) 7 June 2006

[edit] WNSR

Zack:

While I appreciate your comments regarding WNSR; I am somewhat concerned about the misinformation that is contained therein. As one example, WNSR does not lower power at night just because of WHBQ. (It's a skywave issue.) In fact, WHBQ is directional at night. It's signal PROTECTS WNSR and other stations in the East at after sunset. Specifically, WHBQ's pattern is aimed towards the west at night.

Just to clarify, this is not an opinion from a fan or a third party. Believe me, I am one who DOES know.

Best regards,

R.

Zack, here are my observations about your your latest edit of the WNSR article.

1. For some reason, you removed the info about how WNSR's daytime signal must co-exist with WHBQ's, but left in the comparison of the two stations' nighttime signals.

2. The fact that WHBQ's nighttime signal aims more or less away from WNSR's is probably just a coincidence. WHBQ has a Class B license, which lets that station receive nighttime protection as well as give it. WNSR, however, possesses a Class D license, which prevents it from receiving any nighttime protection from any other AM station and forces WNSR to protect any and all Class B stations on 560 kHz and nearby frequencies at night. That, combined with the fact that WHBQ is a few decades older than WNSR and thus more or less enjoys a "first come, first served" edge over WNSR in the FCC's eyes, is why I think it's important for the WNSR article to mention WHBQ's impact on WNSR's signal.--TwoTone 20:52, 8 June 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Bellevue

Bellevue is in the "GSD", the part of Metro not part of the original city as of the time of the passage of the charter and the areas subsequently added. It is not one, or part of one, of the "satellite cities" and ceratinly has no municipal government. How is it not "unincorporated"? Is your arguement that everything in Metro is "incorporated" into "Nashville-Davidson" and therefore Davidson County has no "unincorporated" communities? Rlquall 21:17, 8 June 2006 (UTC)

The idea that Nashville itself is unincorporated is in fact quite credible; after all, it's the "Metropolitan County Council" in fact. The reason that I won't go with that, aside from it being so counterintuitive, is that there is no way that the "satellite cities" are not incorporated as they have their own charters and aldermen and I don't think that Nashville can be less; also Metro has more of the nature of a municipal government than a county one even though it is in fact both. Have you ever noticed how only the mayor and council are truly "Metro" offices elected according to the charter provisions (in the odd years and nonpartisan); the rest such as county clerk, sheriff, register of deeds and the like are in fact Davidson County offices and elected in a partisan manner under the general provisions of state law? BTW, not that it's any of my business & if you don't want to answer I'll understand, but are you still legally a Nashvillian or have you moved your residence to Alabama? Rlquall 02:23, 12 June 2006 (UTC)

My point in stating that Bellevue is "unincorporated" was largely based on stressing that it lacks any "official" status in that it is neither a "town" nor a census-designated place, and therefore cannot be assigned any sort of realistic population figure, as there are no really agreed-upon boundries. It certainly wasn't to imply that it does or should consist of a flashing yellow light and a boarded-up gas station, not that you think that was what I meant. Post-Metro there have been road signs inside Davidson County referencing places that were "unincorporated" (Vaughns Gap and Joelton come to mind immediately, as does Scottsboro IIRC) but AFAIK now, these signs are gone, helping to make your point. I think one of the hardest calls that we can make as serious Wikipedians is which "unincorporated communities" are encyclopedic/notable. For example, I can think of two communities very near here called "Taylor Town" and "Claylick" which are certainly verifiable (both even have roads named for them) but in my mind at least, just not notable (no remaining economic activity, among other factors). Both probably have more population than two places that I feel to be notable and am thinking about creating pages for, Vernon and Reynoldsburg, because the latter are the former county seats of Hickman and Humphreys counties respectively. I just think that Bellevue needs to be in some sort of category showing that it is a verifiable place but is neither "city", "town", nor "village", and if you have a suggestion as to what to call it I'll be very open to that. Rlquall 21:18, 13 June 2006 (UTC)

Just to futher reinforce the correctness of your postion, I was just given the latest version of the offical TDOT road map, and, in contrast to last year, all of Davidson County is now shaded as being part of Nashville. However, just calling Bellevue, Madison, Donelson, Hermitage, Old Hickory et al. "neighborhoods" is a little short of what saying what they really are, as they have their own identity in ways that Whispering Hills, Charlotte Park, Hillwood Park, Horton Heights, and Paragon Mills, for example, definitely do not. I guess this is somewhat, at least, based on economic activity. If you have input as to what these communities are rather than "unincorporated", which I now must agree is erroneous, please share it. Thanks, Rlquall 20:25, 15 June 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Ronnie Miller?

Did he create attack pages that have since been deleted? His contribution history is clear. Syrthiss 15:11, 12 June 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Chiropractors

Yeah, sorry about that, I signed off and my friend got on and must have done whatever he did to that page. -- HasBeenCorrected 06:21, 14 June 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Article on the Smack-Off

Zack, the article on the Smack-Off has been AfD'd. Any thoughts? Willbyr (talk | contribs) 19:12, 8 July 2006 (UTC)

[edit] STS-1

Why do you keep removing my 'Mission anomalies' section from STS-1? I'm all in favor of preventing vandalism of Wiki sites, but as far as I'm concerned you are vandalising that page by repeatedly removing my additions to it. If you have an objection to that section, can you please stop removing it and discuss your objection on the talk page. Mark Grant 21:34, 15 July 2006 (UTC)

Since you don't seem to want to give a reason for deleting my changes, I've reinstated them, while leaving in the rest of the last change you made (removing the SONET link, and I don't understand why you did that either, since you've reinstated it at least twice after someone else removed it). If you want to remove my changes again, please discuss it first on the STS-1 talk page, as I see no reason whatsoever why my changes are detrimental to the STS-1 page. Mark Grant 22:47, 15 July 2006 (UTC)

You keep claiming that I broke the info box on that page. Firstly, I did not break the info box, and if you'd checked the page history before reverting it to a page before my edits, you'd have realised that. Secondly, even if I had broken the info box, it took me about thirty seconds to figure out how to fix it without deleting any edits. Fixing vandalism is a good thing, but reverting pages and deleting other people's edits to remove an edit from someone you consider a vandal is barely distinguishable from vandalism. Please examine the history a little more carefully in future. Mark Grant 11:35, 16 July 2006 (UTC)

[edit] What's wrong?

[1]: why? — Knowledge Seeker দ 09:33, 16 July 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Larisa Oleynik

Honestly, I wasn't meaning to drive you nuts or anything. Wikipedia needs good, hardworking editors, so please don't get discouraged. I just have a personal vendetta against all fansites. Good work with STS-1, btw. Desertsky85451 17:00, 17 July 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Image tagging for Image:Sabine_ehrenfeld.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Sabine_ehrenfeld.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

• Wikipedia:Image use policy
• Wikipedia:Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 14:56, 1 August 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Wikistress

You seem like you are a bit stressed out over wikipedia matters. Is this so? What is wrong? — [Mac Davis] (talk)

Sorry to hear that you're so stressed out! I hope you've benen able to relax a bit, and that things are improving. -- Natalya 00:43, 14 August 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Image:LPField.jpg listed for deletion

ccwaters 14:15, 30 August 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Your edit to Pibb Xtra

Your recent edit to Pibb Xtra (diff) was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to recognize and repair vandalism to Wikipedia articles. If the bot reverted a legitimate edit, please accept my humble creator's apologies – if you bring it to the attention of the bot's owner, we may be able to improve its behavior. Click here for frequently asked questions about the bot and this warning. // AntiVandalBot 05:27, 15 September 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Image tagging for Image:LPField.png

Thanks for uploading Image:LPField.png. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

• Wikipedia:Image use policy
• Wikipedia:Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 09:57, 31 October 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Unspecified source for Image:Mayor adam west.png

Thanks for uploading Image:Mayor adam west.png. I notice the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this file yourself, then there needs to be a justification explaining why we have the right to use it on Wikipedia (see copyright tagging below). If you did not create the file yourself, then you need to specify where it was found, i.e., in most cases link to the website where it was taken from, and the terms of use for content from that page.

If the file also doesn't have a copyright tag, then one should be added. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Fair use, use a tag such as {{fairusein|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair_use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Drat (Talk) 11:08, 21 November 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Image:WillAnderson.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:WillAnderson.jpg. I notice the 'image' page specifies that the image is being used under fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first fair use criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed image could reasonably be found or created. If you believe this image is not replaceable, please:

1. Go to the image description page and edit it to add {{Replaceable fair use disputed}}, without deleting the original Replaceable fair use template.
2. On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace the fair use image by finding a freely licensed image of its subject or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our fair use criteria. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that any fair use images which are replaceable by free-licensed alternatives will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. --Chowbok ☠ 21:00, 22 November 2006 (UTC)