Zimmermann Telegram

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The Zimmermann Telegram (The Zimmermann Note) was a coded telegram dispatched by the Foreign Secretary of the German Empire, Arthur Zimmermann, on January 19, 1917, to the German ambassador in Mexico, Heinrich von Eckardt, at the height of World War I. It instructed the ambassador to approach the Mexican government with a proposal to form an military alliance against the United States. It was intercepted and decoded by the British and its contents hastened the entry of the United States into World War I.

The Zimmermann telegram as it was sent from Washington to Mexico
Enlarge
The Zimmermann telegram as it was sent from Washington to Mexico

.

Contents

[edit] The telegram

Zimmermann's message included proposals for German support of a Mexican offensive on the southwestern United States in the event the United States attacked Germany. The telegram made it clear Germany did not want the United States involved in the war, stating the belief that Britain would be forced to surrender soon. The Japanese government would also join this new alliance in a possible conflict in the Americas. Germany, for its part, would provide financial assistance and the restoration of the former Mexican provinces of Texas, Oklahoma, New Mexico, Arizona, California, Nevada, Utah, and Colorado- all American States.

[edit] The Mexican answer

Later, a General assigned by Mexico's President, Venustiano Carranza, assessed the plausibility of a Mexican takeover of their former provinces and came to the conclusion that it would not be feasible for the following reasons: retaking their former provinces would mean war with the US; Germany would not have the capability to supply the arms and support needed for seizure and defense of the territory; and Mexico would not be able to administrate the large Anglo population. Carranza declined Zimmermann's proposals on April 14, by which time the US had declared war on Germany.

[edit] British interception

The telegram as decrypted by the British Naval Intelligence codebreakers. The word Arizona was not in the German codebook and was therefore split into smaller parts.
Enlarge
The telegram as decrypted by the British Naval Intelligence codebreakers. The word Arizona was not in the German codebook and was therefore split into smaller parts.

The telegram was intercepted and decrypted enough to get the gist of it by codebreakers Nigel de Grey, William Montgomery and Admiral William R. Hall of the British Naval Intelligence unit, Room 40. This was made possible because the code the Foreign Office used (0075) had been partially cryptanalyzed using, among other techniques, captured plaintext messages and a codebook for an earlier version of the cipher captured from Wilhelm Wassmuss, a German agent working in the Middle East.

The British government, which wanted to expose the incriminating telegram, faced a dilemma: if it boldly produced the actual telegram, the Germans would know that their code had been broken; and if it did not, it would lose a promising opportunity to draw the United States into World War I — the message was sent during a period when anti-German feeling in the United States was running particularly high, following the loss of some 128 US lives to German submarine attacks.

There was a further problem too — they could not simply confidentially show it to the United States government either. Because of its importance, the message had been sent from Berlin to the German ambassador in Washington, Johann von Bernstorff, for onward transmission to their ambassador in Mexico, von Eckardt, by three separate routes. The British had obtained it from just one of these — the Americans had given Germany access to their private diplomatic telegraph in an effort to encourage President Wilson's peace initiative.

The Germans were not afraid of using it because the messages were encrypted, because as a matter of principle the United States did not at that time read other countries' diplomatic correspondence and because, unlike Britain, the US did not have any code-breaking capability. The telegraph cable went from the US Embassy in Berlin to Copenhagen and then via submarine cable to the United States via Britain (where it was monitored). For the British to reveal the source of the telegram to the United States would have meant also admitting to the American government that they had tapped US diplomatic communications.

The cable to Washington was in code 7500, a newer, more difficult code. However, the embassy in Mexico did not yet have this code, so the German embassy in Washington would have to re-transmit the message in an older code, 13040 or 13042, both better known to the British. A British agent in Mexico City bribed an employee of the commercial telegraph company to obtain a copy of the message.

[edit] The British solution

The telegram, completely decrypted and translated.
Enlarge
The telegram, completely decrypted and translated.

The British government guessed that the German Embassy in Washington, D.C. would send the message on to the embassy in Mexico via the commercial telegraph system, and therefore a copy would exist in the public telegraph office in Mexico City. If they could get a copy, they could pass it on to the United States government stating that they had discovered it through espionage in Mexico. Therefore, they contacted a British agent in Mexico, known only as Mr. H., who managed to get a copy. In his autobiography, Sir Thomas Hohler, the British Ambassador in Mexico at that time, claims to have been Mr. H. To the delight of the British code breakers, the message had been sent from the German embassy in Washington to Mexico using the older cypher in the Wassmuss codebook and could therefore be completely decrypted.

The telegram was delivered by Admiral Hall to the British Foreign Minister, Arthur James Balfour, who in turn contacted the U.S. ambassador in Britain, Walter Page, and delivered the telegram to him on February 23. Two days later he relayed it to President Woodrow Wilson.

[edit] The effect in the United States

The popular sentiment in the United States at that time was generally as anti-Mexican as it was anti-German. General John J. Pershing had long been chasing the revolutionary Pancho Villa, who had carried out several cross-border raids. This was at great expense to the U.S. government, and Wilson was leaning towards discontinuing the search until new elections were held in Mexico, a new government installed, and a new constitution promulgated (a constitutional convention, which would adopt the 1917 Constitution of Mexico, was underway at the time). News of the telegram exacerbated tensions between the USA and Mexico, since such a treaty, if in place, would have hindered the election of a new Mexican government more friendly to U.S. interests.

On March 1, the U.S. government gave the plaintext of the telegram to the press. Initially the American public believed the telegram to be a fraud designed to bring them into the war on the Allied side. This opinion was bolstered by German, Mexican and Japanese diplomats, and by the American pacifist and pro-German lobbies, who all denounced the telegram as a forgery.

[edit] Arthur Zimmermann's speech

Arthur Zimmermann.
Enlarge
Arthur Zimmermann.

In an unexpected move, Zimmermann confirmed the authenticity of the telegram on March 3, and again in a speech on March 29, 1917. The speech was intended to explain his side of the situation. He began that he had not written a letter to Carranza but had given instructions to the German ambassador via a "route that had appeared to him to be a safe one".

He also said that despite the submarine offensive, he had hoped that the USA would remain neutral. His proposals to the Mexican government were only to be carried out if the US declared war, and he believed his instructions to be "absolutely loyal as regards the US". In fact, he blamed President Wilson for breaking off relations with Germany "with extraordinary roughness" after the telegram was intercepted, and that therefore the German ambassador "no longer had the opportunity to explain the German attitude, and that the US government had declined to negotiate".

There was a ring of honesty in the speech since Zimmermann would have had occasion to reflect on the impact of the telegram and its after effects in the meantime, but he was still prepared to defend its original ideas. However, it also revealed he was seriously misinformed about the real strength of the United States vis-à-vis its southern neighbour; but that was the fault of the German intelligence services.

[edit] War declared against Germany

The telegram began by stating, "We intend to begin on the first of February unrestricted submarine warfare. We shall endeavor in spite of this to keep the United States of America neutral". Immediately after its publication there was an outpouring of anti-German sentiment. Wilson responded by asking Congress to arm American ships so that they could fend off potential German submarine attacks. A few days later, on April 2, 1917, Wilson asked Congress to declare war on Germany. On April 6, 1917, Congress complied, bringing the United States into World War I.

German submarines had previously attacked US ships near the British Isles, so the telegram was not the only cause of US entry into the war. It was perceived as especially perfidious that the telegram was first transferred from the US embassy in Berlin to the German embassy in Washington before being passed on to Mexico. Once the American public believed the telegram to be real, it became all but inevitable that the USA would join the Great War.

[edit] Historical post-script

In October 2005, it was revealed that an original typescript of the deciphered Zimmermann Telegram had recently been discovered by an unnamed historian who was researching and preparing an official history of the United Kingdom’s Government Communications Headquarters (GCHQ). The document is believed to be the actual telegram shown to the American ambassador in London in 1917. Marked in Admiral Hall's handwriting at the top of the document are the words: "This is the one handed to Dr Page and exposed by the President." Since many of the secret documents in this incident had been destroyed, it had previously been assumed that the original typed "decrypt" was gone forever. However, after discovery of this document, the GCHQ official historian said: "I believe that this is indeed the same document that Balfour handed to Page."

[edit] Alternative theories

It has been argued[citation needed] that rather than cracking the code themselves, the British may have been given the code or the message itself by Zionists in Germany; according to this theory, Room 40 and the activities in Mexico were used to create a cover story to hide the existence of agents in Germany. This view is said to provide a possible motive for the British then issuing the Balfour Declaration, in payment for the services of their Zionist agent in Berlin. In that document, the British Foreign Office offered to provide a homeland in Palestine for the Jews.

A more involved theory proposed by one John Cornelius holds that the Zimmerman message was actually composed in Britain, and given to a supposed Zionist agent high in the German government, who then persuaded Zimmerman to send it.[1]

See also: http://www.sisde.it/sito/Rivista16.nsf/efbc5228d556d6a9c1256b650038241e/68a4844af6d2861ac1256b91004deb5f!OpenDocument&Click=

[edit] See also

Arthur Zimmermann

[edit] Related works and references in pop culture

A subplot to the 1986 movie Three Amigos. It involved Germans supplying Mexican outlaws with weapons.

[edit] References

Wikisource has original text related to this article:
  • Room 40: British Naval Intelligence, 1914—1918, by Patrick Beesly. New York: Harcourt, Brace, Jovanovich, 1982 ISBN 0-15-178634-8
  • On Secret Service East of Constantinople, by Peter Hopkirk. Oxford University Press, 1994 ISBN 0-19-280230-5
  • The Zimmermann Telegram, by Barbara W. Tuchman, Ballantine Books, 1958 ISBN 0-345-32425-0
  • The Zimmermann Telegram of January 16 1917 and its Cryptographic Background, by William F. Friedman and Charles J. Mendelsohn. War Department, Office of the Chief Signal Officer, Washington, GPO, 1938
  • The Zimmermann Telegram, by Simon Singh
  • 'Telegram that brought US into Great War is Found' London Daily Telegraph, 17 October 2005. Article by Ben Fenton

[edit] Further reading

  • The Secret War in Mexico by Friedrich Katz, 1981, University of Chicago Press, ISBN 0-226-42589-4

The Life and Letters of Walter H. Page by Burton J. Hendrick, July 2003, Kessinger Publishing, ISBN 076617106X

Cornelius, John. “The Balfour Declaration and the Zimmermann Note,” The Washington Report on Middle East Affairs (WRMEA), Aug./Sept. 1997.

Cornelius, John. “Answering Critics of the Theory that Balfour Declaration Was Payoff for Zionist Services in WWI,” WRMEA, Sept. 1998.

Cornelius, John. “Palestine, the Balfour Declaration, and Why America Entered the Great War,” WRMEA, Oct./Nov. 1999.

Bernstorff, Count Johann Heinrich. My Three Years in America, New York: Scribner’s, 1920.

Bernstorff, pp.310-311.

Dugdale, Mrs. Edgar. The Balfour Declaration-Origins and Background, London: The Jewish Agency for Palestine, 1940, pp. 15-16.

Weizmann, Chaim. Trial and Error, Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1949, p. 152.

Weizmann, p. 143.

Rothschild, Miriam. Dear Lord Rothschild, Glenside, Pa.: Balaban Publishers, 1983, p. 341.

Dugdale, Blanche. Arthur James Balfour, NY, Putnam’s, 1937, Vol. II, pp. 127-9.

Hendrick, Burton J. The Life and Letters of Walter H. Page, NY, Doubleday, Page & Co., 1925, Vol. III, Chap 14.

Howe, Russell Warren. WRMEA, Letters to the Editor, Jan./Feb. 1998, p. 110.

Link, Arthur S., Wilson, Vol. 5, Princeton, NJ, 1965, Princeton University Press, pp 433-5.

Dugdale, Arthur James Balfour, Vol. II.

Friedman, William F. and Mendelsohn, Charles J. The Zimmermann Telegram of January 16, 1917 and its Cryptographic Background, Laguna Hills, CA: Aegean Park Press, 1994.

Tuchman, Barbara W. The Zimmermann Telegram. New York: Ballantine Books, 1958, 1966.

Kahn, David. The Codebreakers. New York: Macmillan, 1967, 1996

Antonius, George. The Arab Awakening. Philadelphia, NY: Lippencott, 1939.

[edit] External links