User talk:Zikar
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Talk to me directly here! Leave a message I will respond!
Contents |
[edit] For Zikar
Thanks for compromising with me about Dr. Eggman! --anon
[edit] SNK Boss Syndrome
Hello Zikar, you recently added quite a few bosses to the SNK Boss Syndrome, but forgot to go the talk page listing what characteristics each of the bosses has of the syndrome, as well as providing one or two links confirming the information. Until you do so, I've unfortunately reverted the page. Thanks for the contribution.--Vertigo200 18:44, 10 December 2005 (UTC)
[edit] Image copyright problem with Image:Super2.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Super2.jpg. However, the image may soon be deleted unless we can determine the copyright holder and copyright status. The Wikimedia Foundation is very careful about the images included in Wikipedia because of copyright law (see Wikipedia's Copyright policy).
The copyright holder is usually the creator, the creator's employer, or the last person who was transferred ownership rights. Copyright information on images is signified using copyright templates. The three basic license types on Wikipedia are open content, public domain, and fair use. Find the appropriate template in Wikipedia:Image copyright tags and place it on the image page like this: {{TemplateName}}
.
Please signify the copyright information on any other images you have uploaded or will upload. Remember that images without this important information can be deleted by an administrator. If you have any questions, feel free to contact Carnildo or ask for help at Wikipedia talk:Image copyright tags. Thank you.
- Done. --Zikar 11:21, 29 January 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Super Shadow
What are you talking about, the kids kept on putting in vital information that are not even linking up with the Shadow Article.
Beside no one had the though of creating that section, but when i created it you all had the rights to edit the hell out of, the fact that I wanted to delete the edit I did, and you reverting it!
I will delete my own edit, and you fools can type your own Super Shadow section, and watch it get packed with unuseful information
- >x<ino 00:58, 6 March 2006 (UTC)
NO!
It's better like that, because if it isn't deleted we will just keep on reverting stupid edits!
It's better if the section isn't there for now, because all video game related article are always being targeted and vandaled! If you look at other articles that are not video game related. You can cleary see the details, layout and informaton. If you compare those articles to video game related. It will look like younger wiki editors are the one working on them.
Video game related articles always need cleanup, spellchecked, reverting ect unlike other articles
Alright then...you can do the honors of reverting the vandal edits on Super Shadow!
- >x<ino 03:10, 6 March 2006 (UTC)
You need to stop reverting my edits, why!?
- Because, the Super Shadow section lacks information!
Yes, I do know that section seem to be like an argugment over the name, because we had this same convo over the talk page. When there was a Super Shadow section under Super Sonic article. And I say we need that section, because a lot of people not only fans, beleive the true name of Super Shadow is Hyper Shadow, which we are trying to prove. You seem to be forgetting wiki isn't just all about encyclopedia,...it's also about "Fact".
Now you either agree with me, or that section might just have a debat: might just have a wiki vote. If it should stay or not!
- >x<ino 00:44, 4 April 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Shadow
What da f*k!? Don't make me switch on you (this an't a threat:P), believe me!
First of all, I made that damn section, stupido information kept on going in, I revert that edit about how many f*king times!? Then I deleted that section, cuz I made that section, no body couldn't make it. Which means those information I added are my copyrights. Although wiki is a open free copy right, but I can still choose to keep my details or not.
First of all, if a wiki member keep on reverting countless edits which are basically the same, those edits are known as vandal. Because the same information kept on going there and are wrong!
Since when da hell did I tell you not to edit that section!? I told you that, not to revert the edit I did which was explaining about the real name of Super Shadow. Because alot of people get it wrong! I told you not to revert my edit not saying you are not free to edit!
First of all, I was overratting a little bit, telling editiors not to edit that section. Second instead of me saying I will bann I,P. I used my brain and pasted those edits they kept on doing in the TALK PAGE and annotated explaining why it was wrong. And I think I found out who normally add those info. And I wasn't threating to ban everyone, please don't extraggerate! I know who I was going to bAn, because he/she knows he/she is vandalising!. Same information kept on going in that section. I revert thousands edits which makes it a vandal. Even same vandal happens for those I.P that kept on increasing the pictures & exchanging them. Then you come to my talk page starting to extraggerate rubbish about those editors adding Aura's. If you actually read all those countless edits you will know why!
Right now, we are still in Clean up date, which will end on the 7th of April. I suggest you also do your job, not husling other wiki members about their actions!
- >x<ino 09:51, 4 April 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Image Tagging Image:Oldrobotnik.gif
|
Thanks for uploading Image:Oldrobotnik.gif. I notice the 'image' page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then there needs to be an argument why we have the right to use the media on Wikipedia (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then it needs to be specified where it was found, i.e., in most cases link to the website where it was taken from, and the terms of use for content from that page.
If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag then one should be added. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media qualifies as fair use, consider reading fair use, and then use a tag such as {{fairusein|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair_use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.
If you have uploaded other media, consider checking that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. ReyBrujo 18:05, 24 April 2006 (UTC)
- Hello there! The tag is specifying that the image is lacking a source. That is, if you downloaded it from somewhere in the internet, you need to give a link to the page from where you picked it, and usually a direct link to the image. This is needed in order to fulfill the Fair Use guidelines, especially the fourth point which states that the work must have been published somewhere else prior the upload to Wikipedia. If you scanned the image from the manual or a magazine, you need to specify that you have done that. If you can't remember from where you picked it, you may consider looking for the same or a similar image in the internet, upload it above the current one, and specify the license and source. If you have any other question, please go to my talk page and ask out :-) -- ReyBrujo 03:44, 25 April 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Sonic Forums
Here are some that might be of interest to you:
http://www.sonicstadium.org/board
http://sonic.planets.gamespy.com/fourm
http://www.sonicnaime.net/forums
If you're intro research, check this place out
though be warned, they don't like Gamefaqs level stupidity
Thought it'd be better here instead of the Silver article GrandMasterGalvatron 16:51, 8 December 2006 (UTC)