User talk:Zestauferov
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
1
- A says X is 1
- B says X is not 1
- C claims no knowledge about what X is.
Q. Logically which one A, B or C is free from the burden of proof?
A. C
2
- A provides one source for a view which is also accurate.
- B provides many sources for a view but none of them are accurate.
- C has no opinion, reads A's and B's opinion but does not know which to believe.
Q. Logically on which one A, B or C is the burden of verifying evidence?
A. C
Contents |
[edit] ==
In wiki logic B wins every time The burden is always on A and the importance of C's neutrality is mocked. Until wikipedia is governed by Logic I can not write here anymore. I hear some of you say something along the lines of Hurray! If so then by your own thoughts you are identified as enemies of logic.
For the rest of you PLEASE SEND ME AN EMAIL RATHER THAN POST A MESSAGE FOR ME HERE.
Zestauferov 10:58, 23 July 2005 (UTC)
[edit] Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Template/Workshop
You, or any Wikipedia user, can contribute your suggestions and comments to the /Workshop page of any active arbitration case. Comments on evidence or proposals can help in understanding the import of evidence and in refining proposals. Proposed principles, findings of fact, or remedies may be listed on /Proposed decision and form part of the final decision. Fred Bauder 19:45, 26 October 2005 (UTC)
[edit] AMA
Hello, you are receiving this message because your name is on the list of members of the Association of Members' Advocates. There is a poll being held at Wikipedia talk:Association of Members' Advocates for approval of a proposal for the revitalisation of the association. You are eligible to vote and your vote and input are welcome. Izehar 22:33, 6 January 2006 (UTC)
[edit] AMA Coordinator Election
Dear AMA Member,
You are entitled to vote in the AMA Coordinator election, set to begin at midnight on 3 February 2006. Please see the pages on the election and its candidates and the procedure and policy and cast a vote by e-mail!
Wally 11:40, 2 February 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Possible Copyright violation
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! We appreciate your creation of the article, Hubert, but we cannot accept copyrighted text borrowed from other web sites or printed material. Please see Wikipedia:Copyright problems for more information on this topic, or generally, Wikipedia:Policies and guidelines. Please do not remove the copyright violation notice placed in the article or repost the suspected infringing text. However, if you would like to rewrite the article in your own words, follow the link in the posted notice to create a temporary subpage. If your new article is appropriate, and not a further copyright violation, the reviewing administrator will move that new article into place once the copyright status of the original has been resolved. Happy editing! Heidijane 15:36, 16 July 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Your AMA statement was deleted
Your AMA statement was deleted apparently carelessly from the AMA statements page (see this edit)if your statement needs to be restored, the text is at User:Pedant/AMA error Pedant 02:06, 22 July 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Regarding Association of Members' Advocates
Hi, you are receiving this message because you have listed yourself as an active member of WP:AMA. If you aren't currently accepting inquiries for AMA, or if you have resigned, please de-list yourself from Wikipedia:AMA Members. If you are still active, please consider tending to any new requests that may appear on Category:AMA Requests for Assistance. We're going to put AMA on wheels. :) Sorry for the template spamming - we're just trying to update our records, after we had a huge backlog earlier in the week (if you've been taking cases, then sorry, and please ignore this :)). Again, sorry, and thanks! Martinp23 21:31, 22 October 2006 (UTC)
