User talk:Zero X Marquis

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Contents

[edit] Welcome

Welcome!

Hello, Zero X Marquis, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome!  -ZeroTalk 14:55, 3 May 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Mega Man X

I've reverted your edits to Mega Man X. I found them questionable for encyclopedia inclusion and would think it more appropriate if you discuss this on the article's Talkpage first. -ZeroTalk 14:55, 3 May 2006 (UTC)

[edit] License tagging for Image:BlackZero1.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:BlackZero1.jpg. Wikipedia gets hundreds of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 18:04, 21 June 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Your edits to Power Rangers: Zeo

Please be careful not to remove content from Wikipedia without a valid reason, which you should specify in the edit summary or on the article's talk page. Thank you. Ryulong 01:15, 2 July 2006 (UTC)

The edit summary for the removal was listed as blank. Ryulong 01:23, 2 July 2006 (UTC)
Oh, I saw your edits on the talk page. Ryulong 01:25, 2 July 2006 (UTC)
The correct term for the filled in pentagram (or a concave decagon) is a five-pointed star. Ryulong 02:10, 2 July 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Superman Returns

The reason it isn't needed is because 1. it's repeating a portion of what is said just above it. and 2. it's including an opinion about "inconsistency". Since it cannot be established whether they merely changed the effects of Kryptonite, or that it was an error on their part, we have to leave it as ambiguous trivia. Bignole 04:50, 3 July 2006 (UTC)

I'm quite aware of the actual error, please see the Talk page for my stand on that. I'm merely stating what was agreed upon in the talk page, please see there before making assumptions. Also, please respond to user talk pages (discussion), not user pages. Bignole 05:09, 3 July 2006 (UTC)
I've got one for you, since you pointed out the suite tore when the doctors ripped it off but didn't burn on re-entry. Well, hold on, let me fix that bit first. Terminal velocity of a human isn't fast enough to create the heat necessary to burn up. But, the real trick is, since he had no powers (thanks the kryptonite in his body), and this is proven once they remove the Kryptonite they can no longer penetrate his skin with a needle. So, since he had no powers when they found him then he had none while he fell, so the question remains how did his body survive the impact of the ground? Bignole
I just thought it was interesting to note that the doctors can rip his suite clean off him (which by the way was never explained how he put it back on after it was ripped) and yet he doesn't turn into gumbo soup in his fall to Earth. I just think they took too many liberties with the character.Bignole 20:12, 3 July 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Braniac Strikes Backon DCAU

I undestand and actually agree with your rationale for removing it (now that I've thought about it.) However, next time, why not just create a new section for it rather than simply deleting information. It is related to the DCAU after all and could be mistaken for DCAU, so it seems like having it in the article makes sense to me. Thanks!--Gillespee 00:00, 28 July 2006 (UTC)

[edit] MMAR Controversy Edits

I really don't think that you should have deleted so much of the controversy section. The author had intended for both sides of the argument to be displayed and you are, in a way, taking away from the ovjectivity of the topic by removing half of it. I'd rather see the entry the way it previously was... more impartial.

[edit] Tommy Oliver leadership question

I saw your Tommy Oliver, White Ranger leadership question and I have posted a response on the Talk:Tommy Oliver page near the bottom. I hope that it clears up any confusion you may have had. Always willing to lend a helping hand... RabidPanda V 17:14, 7 August 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Power Coins--Dragon Coin

I agree with the statement about the status of the coin now... good resolution... thanks! However, your explanation was a little off. In "Green Candle, Pt. II" Zordon said the powers would be lost to Rita, not the coin itself. Through the draining process we saw that the powers were seperable from the sentient coin. RabidPanda V 16:43, 27 August 2006 (UTC) Yeah, I see your overall point on it possibly being a copy of the coin. Either way, the power still exists, but it should be noted that it could have been a copy, so I also changed it on Tommy Oliver's page. Zero X Marquis 16:52, 27 August 2006 (UTC)