User talk:Zeno McDohl

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Welcome!

Hello Zeno McDohl, and welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! By the way, you can sign your name on Talk and vote pages using three tildes, like this: ~~~. Four tildes (~~~~) produces your name and the current date. If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the village pump or ask me on my Talk page. Again, welcome! --Courtkittie (talk) July 30, 2005 (UTC)

Contents

[edit] Blanking talk pages

The diff you cited doesn't relate to User talk:Dragonball1986 at all. In the diff you presented, an anon blanked the talk page, not the user himself. You should probably read WP:TALK; although Dragonball1986's blanking the page was kind of rude, it wasn't that big of a deal. ~MDD4696 16:35, 26 May 2006 (UTC) (an administrator)

That doesn't rule out that the anon is the user. I also feel that deleting others comments breaks WP:CIVIL. Ah, here we go. Something specific: Removing warnings for vandalism from one's talk page is also considered vandalism... --Zeno McDohl 21:23, 26 May 2006 (UTC)

[edit] NPOV Super Mario: Blue Twilight DX

Zeno, do you have any further evidence of NPOV on Super Mario: Blue Twilight DX? None of us seem to be sure what NPOV exists. If you could drop me a line so I can fix up the article, I'd appreciate it. Thanks! --Polkapunk 16:55, 28 June 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Hello, I have a question

Umm, hi. I'm Tasermon's Partner and i'm new to Wikipedia. And you gave me a talk message sayin' I could contact you if I needed any help. Well, I was wonderin', if it's not too much trouble, I've noticed that on articles that have sections/subsections, and people edit parts of the sections, on the edit history page, a gray arrow with the name of the section edited will appear to lead you to the section edited. But when I make edits to sections, even when they're not minor, the arrow and title don't appear. Do you know who to get it to do that? I just don't want antone to be confused by any edits I make. I tried lookin' for how to do it in the help pages, but they didn't say how, or I couldn't find it. Oh, and if you see anythin' I'm doin' wrong, pleas feel free to tell me, because I probably don't realize I'm doin' it. Thanks, and sorry to disturb you! Tasermon's Partner (talk) 02:32, 21 August 2006 (UTC)

[edit] AMCOTW support

You showed support for Anime and Manga Collaboration of the Week.
This week InuYasha was selected to be improved to featured article status.
Hope you can help.

[edit] Chibot Ultra Battle

Please do not remove PROD tags until the AfD process is complete. Notability is a hurdle subjects must overcome before they get an article in the encyclopedia, see WP:NN. Cheers. L0b0t 15:28, 24 October 2006 (UTC)

(My response on L0b0t's talk page, which they deleted) I removed the prod tag because the tag clearly stated it could be removed; the article is already well written and does not need copyediting or the sort. If the article did need a cleanup, then the cleanup tag should have been used. And as I stated, notability is not a policy thus it should have not been prod'd, but instead AfD'd as it is now. --Zeno McDohl (talk) 18:31, 24 October 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Message to l0b0t

Whose comments have I edited? L0b0t 03:59, 27 October 2006 (UTC)


Technically more of a markup than an edit as your comment was not changed. However, you seem to be bothered by it for which I apologise. No harm done. Cheers. L0b0t 04:06, 27 October 2006 (UTC)
6 of 1, 1/2 dozen of the other. Again, I'm sorry it bothered you. Cheers. L0b0t 04:16, 27 October 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Use of Test templates

(Taking this here from User talk:Dark glaive): well, the "test" template, even if not speaking explicitly of "vandalism", implies in its wording that an edit was nonsense, that the user who made it is clueless, and that you have no intention of taking his edit seriously. And of course, experienced users like Dark glaive know that it's commonly used euphemistically to deal with vandalism. For both reasons, applied to an edit like his, it can come across as quite incivil. Fut.Perf. ☼ 05:49, 13 November 2006 (UTC)

I would have to say, I didn't take his edit entirely serious. Quote the user "This is just annoying and I disagree with the recommendation)", where the tag had a very obvious Discuss link. Oh and I did not write the test template, thus I was not implying anything. --Zeno McDohl (talk) 05:53, 13 November 2006 (UTC)
Retrieved from "http://en.wikipedia.org../../../z/e/n/User_talk%7EZeno_McDohl_160b.html"