User talk:Zen Dunn-Clarke

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

It is felt that the article you created at Zen Dunn-Clarke is not suitable for a Wikipedia article, which must have a notable subject and be verifiable. I have moved it to User:Zen Dunn-Clarke, which is where users are free to write about themselves. You are at liberty to move it back into the (Main) namespace but bear in mind that if you do so, it is likely to be nominated for deletion.

Note, however, that the purpose of a user page is to enable active editors of Wikipedia to introduce themselves to other editors. Wikipedia is not a general hosting service, so your user page is not a personal homepage. Content unrelated to Wikipedia or its editing is likely to be removed.

Please see the user page guidelines, especially this section for more information.

Please read WP:AUTO. The recommendation is always: wait until someone else writes a bio about you. -- RHaworth 05:10, 3 May 2006 (UTC)

[edit] User:Zen Dunn-Clarke

I've added the "{{prod}}" template to the article User:Zen Dunn-Clarke, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but I don't believe it satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and I've explained why in the deletion notice (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). Please either work to improve the article if the topic is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, or, if you disagree with the notice, discuss the issues at Talk:User:Zen Dunn-Clarke. You may remove the deletion notice, and the article will not be deleted, but note that it may still be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached, or if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria. Calton | Talk 01:53, 4 December 2006 (UTC)