User talk:Zaxem

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Contents

[edit] Phil Dent

Thank you for cleaning this up into a stub. I ran across it and put it on my VfD-if-no-one-cares-enough-to-fix-it-for-thirty-days list. I can now take it off. Robert A West 20:27, 12 August 2005 (UTC)

[edit] tennis articles

great to see the work you ve been doing on articles related to tennis. regards, -Mayumashu 14:03, 2 October 2005 (UTC)

I would appreciate you having your say about this. Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chronological list of ATP Masters Series tournament winners Thx.Scineram 20:31, 28 October 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Pancho

A nice job on Gonzales -- now if the busybodies will just leave it alone. I may add more material if I don't get too frustrated with the Wikimeddlers. Why don't you take a look at Laver and clean that up a little, including all the speculation about how great he was? Cheers! Hayford Peirce 20:51, 27 January 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Pancho redux

Great job with the Pancho Gonzales article! I was also trying to figure out how to re-arrange it, and your solution was better than anything I had thought of. Steve Casburn 21:07, 27 January 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Laver

You're absolutely right. There are still people who consider him the greatest, but, I think, they are mistaken, blinded by the two Grand Slams. In any case, most people here in 2006 believe, I would say, that Sampras or Federer is the greatest. (I have my own opinion on the matter.) But "widely" was making me grit my teeth. Thanks for changing it. Hayford Peirce 01:35, 19 February 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Shuzo Matsuoka

It's nice to know you. I am a tennis writer of Japanese Wikipedia. I found your name in Shuzo Matsuoka last September. I made a poor stub, but you added statements, very useful to us (not only me, but also for Japanese tennis fans). I've thought "how" I can tell thanks to you. Currently, Japanese WP reached "200" tennis players' articles, the 7th of the world. I started 165 out of them. My best regards. ... --Hhst 03:10, 21 March 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Thanks for voting on my RfA

Thanks so much for voting!
Thanks so much for voting on my request for adminship. I have decided to withdraw my nomination as it seems that consensus will not be reached. If you voted in support, thanks for putting your trust in me to be a good admin. If you voted in opposition, thank you as well for your constructive criticism as it will only help me be a better Wikipedian and perhaps help if/when I apply for adminship again sometime in the future.

Mahogany

[edit] Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mick Sleeper

You voted "Delete per nom" - but it looks like the nom may have been withdrawn. Please reconsider or provide an independent rationale. - CrazyRussian talk/contribs/email 04:39, 14 May 2006 (UTC)

[edit] True Torah Jews

Hi, I posted a defense of the article True Torah Jews, I would like to ask you to be so kind and read it, and than rethink your position on deletion.

Bloger 00:12, 15 May 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Blnguyen's RfA

Hello Zaxem. Thank you for your support at request for adminship which ended at the overwhelming and flattering result of (160/1/0), and leaves me in a position of having to live up to a high standard of community expectation. I have removed the old sig because it seems to play up on some browsers. If you need any admin assistance, feel free to ask me, and naturally, if I make any procedural mistakes, feel free to point them out and I look forward to working with you in the future, Blnguyen | Have your say!!! 07:12, 30 May 2006 (UTC)

[edit] My RfA

Thank you for voting in my recently unsuccessful RfA. I plan on working harder in the coming months so that I have a better chance of becoming an admin in the future. I hope you will consider supporting my if I have another RfA. Thank you for your comments. --digital_me(t/c) 15:58, 6 June 2006 (UTC)

[edit] My RFA

Thanks
Zaxem, thank you for participating in my RfA. It passed with an amazingly unopposed 77/0/1. Thanks for the support everybody! If you see me doing anything wrong, want to ask me something, or just want to yell in my general direction, leave me a note on my talk page. I promise to try and knock out Wikipedia's problems wherever I may find them!

Staxringold talkcontribs 20:48, 6 June 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Kukini's RfA

Hello, Zaxem, and thank you for voting on my recent RfA! With a final vote of 84/1/4, I have now been entrusted with the mop, bucket and keys. I will be slowly acclimating myself to my new tools over the next months, but welcome any and all feedback and suggestions on how I might be able to use them to help the project. Thanks again! Kukini 15:04, 10 June 2006 (UTC)

[edit] RfA/Gurch

Thanks, your support is welcome – Gurch 16:20, 12 June 2006 (UTC)

[edit] CrazyRussian's RfA

Hello Zaxem, and thank you for your support at my request for adminship, which ended with an awe-inspiring 86/1/2 result. I plan to do much with my shiny new tools - but I'll start slow and learn the ropes at first. Please deluge me with assignments and requests - I enjoy helping out. For Mother Russia!! - CrazyRussian talk/contribs/email 04:55, 13 June 2006 (UTC)

[edit] My RFA
Zaxem, thank you very much for your support in my recent Request for adminship, it passed with a final tally of (65/3/3) - which I find both amazing and humbling. I wish I had time to thank everyone personally, but I'm afraid all I can offer is this token of my gratitude. I hope to live up to your expectations/hopes. If at any stage you need to contact me, for help or a request or to point out a mistake in my conduct, please make sure to tell me on my talk page. --Fir0002 08:19, 13 June 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Thank you

Image:WikiThanks.png Hi Zaxem, thank you for voting in my RFA which failed eventually at a result of (91/51/8). I do not plan to run for adminship until a later date. Once again, I will like to thank you for voting. --Terence Ong (talk | contribs) 14:23, 13 June 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Thanks

Although no consensus was reached in the end, I still wanted to thank you for your vote in my recent RfA. Thank you very much. Fritz Saalfeld (Talk) 17:57, 14 June 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Thanks for your support in my RfA!

Thanks for voting!
Hello Zaxem, and thanks for your support in my recent RfA. I'm pleased to announce that it passed with a final tally of (96/0/0). I was overwhelmed by all of the nice comments and votes of confidence from everyone. Thanks again, and see you around! OhNoitsJamie Talk 16:42, 30 June 2006 (UTC)

[edit] My RfA

Hey Zaxem, just a quick note to let you know I withdrew my RfA at 13/11/10. Cheers for your support. :) --james(talk) 11:04, 12 August 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Goldom's RFA thanks

Thank you for your support on my RFA, which closed successfully this morning with a result of (53/2/1). I've spent the day trying out the new tools, and trying not to mess things up too badly :). I was quite thrilled with all the support, both from the people I see around every day, as well as many users who I didn't know from before, yet wrote such wonderful things about me. I look forward to helping to serve all of you, and the project. Let me know if there's anything I can help you with. -Goldom ‽‽‽ ⁂ 04:32, 13 August 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Phil Dent 2

Hello Mr. Zaxem, do you remember our talk about Shuzo Matsuoka? Yesterday, I reached "300" tennis players in Japanese WP, currently World No.5. Today, I wrote Phil Dent in Japanese, the second version in Wikipedia! He was a great doubles player, reaching Men's Doubles finals of Australian Open 4 times (1970, 1973, 1975, Dec. 1977), French Open twice (1975, 1979). Also, I started a poor stub of Mirjana Lučić of Croatia. Can you try addition of her article? What I think very often, "Had Wikipedia existed several years earlier..." like that. (Recently, your talk page is filled with RFA, not tennis.) My best regards. --Hhst 06:28, 14 August 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Wangi/RFA

Thanks for your support on my RfA. Give me shout if I can be of help. Thanks/wangi 00:20, 19 August 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Deville's RfA

Hello, Zaxem, and thank you for the support on my recent RfA. The final tally was 72/1/0, and I have now been entrusted with the mop. I'll be tentative with the new buttons for a while, and certainly welcome any and all feedback on how I might be able to use them to help the project. All the best, and thanks again! — Deville (Talk) 00:50, 25 August 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Chris Robertson article

Thanks for the message about this article. The current form seems encyclopedic and notable. Tyro 05:27, 25 August 2006 (UTC)

[edit] performance timelines on tennis pages

Hello, I just wanted to ask you a couple of questions on the new performance timelines by User:tennis expert that you recently approved. It is the opinion of a few wikipedians that his new timelines look rather displeasing, and, while they highlight information quite well, the colorways tend to clash, leading the timeline to look more like a mosaic than a timeline. Now, what has been happening is the displeased wikipedians have simply reverted the timelines back to the old ones, and in response, tennis expert has (understandably) reverted them back. In this situation, what are a group of concerned wikipedians to do? The obvious solution is to try and compromise with tennis expert, however, he seems convinced that his timeline is the new standard, regardless of what others think. As a relatively new member, I wonder: is there any way to organize a discussion with all wikipedians concerned with this change, including tennis expert, in order to come up with a reasonable compromise? I thank you for any assistance you may provide. --Flute138 03:09, 28 August 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Teke's RfA thanks

Thank you for your support of my RfA, which has passed with a final tally of 76/1/1. With this overwhelming show of support and approval I am honored to serve Wikipedia in the task charged to me and as outlined in my nomination. Happy editing to you! Teke(talk) 17:41, 28 August 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Long-Overdue RfA Thanks from Alphachimp

 Thanks for your support in my not-so-recent RfA, which was successful with a an overwhelmingly flattering and deeply humbling total of 138/2/2 (putting me #10 on the RfA WP:100). I guess infinite monkey theorem has been officially proven. Chimps really can get somewhere on Wikipedia.

With new buttons come great responsibility, and I'll try my best to live up to your expectations. If you need assistance with something, don't hesitate to swing by my talk page or email me (trust me, I do respond :)). The same goes for any complaints or comments in regard to my administrative actions. Remember, I'm here for you.

(Thanks go to Blnguyen for the incredible photo to the right.) alphaChimp laudare 05:31, 3 September 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Winhunter's RfA thanks

Hi Zaxem, thank you for supporting me in my RfA, which was closed as successful today with a finaly tally of (56/0/3). I will be very careful at first to avoid any mistakes. Please feel free to leave a message in my talk page if you have any comments/suggestions about me in the future. Once again, thank you! --WinHunter (talk) 09:18, 4 September 2006 (UTC)

[edit] JPD's RfA

Thanks, Zaxem, for your support at my RfA, which finished with a tally of 94/1/0. I hope I live up to the confidence you have shown in me in my activities as an administrator. JPD (talk) 16:24, 5 September 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Hunter Irrigation

can you please return to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hunter Irrigation and explain your comment because this company is very notable Yuckfoo 08:11, 8 September 2006 (UTC)

[edit] My RFA

Thank you, Zaxem, for voting on my RFA, which passed 95 to 1. Now that I have the mop, I hope I can live up to the standard, and be a good administrator. If you have any questions, feel free to ask me. —this is messedrocker (talk) 19:04, 14 September 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Non-notable collectible card game players

I noticed that you recently participated in the discussion of Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Roy St. Clair (4th nomination). You may also be interested in the following discussions for the following collectible card game players:

Thank you. -- Malber (talk • contribs) 19:06, 18 September 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Thanks Zaxem

Hey Zaxem. Thank you for supporting my recent RfA. It finished with an amazing final tally of 160/4/1. I really appreciate your support. Cheers, Sarah Ewart (Talk) 20:52, 21 September 2006 (UTC)

Another thanks to Zaxem for correcting the spelling of Nathalie Grinham to Natalie Grinham. In addition I now made a redirect from Nathalie Grinham. Cheers, SportsAddicted 11:11, 1 October 2006 (UTC)

[edit] RfA thanks from StuffOfInterest

Thank you for participating in my RfA, which finished with a tally of 52/6/1 (~90%). It was an interesting process which gave me a chance to learn a bit about myself and about the community. My intention now is to slowly ease into using those additional buttons on my page. No use being over eager and mucking up the works. The support of all those who went over my record and/or rallied to my defense after the big oppose vote was instumental to the success of this review. Again, thank you! --StuffOfInterest 12:18, 10 October 2006 (UTC)

[edit] My RfA

Hey Zaxem,

I just wanted to thank you for your support in my recent request for adminship, which passed unanimously with a final tally of 38/0/0. I appreciate your trust, and will do my best to uphold it. Don't hesitate to let me know if you ever need anything. — TKD::Talk 05:44, 21 October 2006 (UTC)

[edit] My RFA!

               Zaxem, thank you so much for your support for my RfA. I passed with a vote tally of 61/0/1. I am honored that the consensus was to allow me the added privilege of the admin mop. I appreciate your support on my RFA! --plange 23:09, 22 October 2006 (UTC)

[edit] RfA thanks

Please accept my thanks for your support in my successful RfA, which I was gratified to learn passed without opposition on October 25, 2006. I am looking forward to serving as an administrator and hope that I prove worthy of your trust. With my best wishes, --MCB 17:01, 26 October 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Thank you for supporting my RfA

Thank you for supporting my RfA that I have passed with 73/2/1.--Jusjih 10:02, 27 October 2006 (UTC)

[edit] RfA thanks

Hi Zaxem, and thanks for your participation at the recent RfA, which did not succeed. For those of you who expressed their support, your kind words and your trust are sincerely appreciated. For those who were opposed --especially those who offered their constructive criticism-- please accept this message as assurance that equally sincere efforts, aimed at enhancing the quality and accuracy of representations within the Wikipedia, will continue. Striving for improved collaboration and consensus will also continue, with all of your insights in mind, while applying NPOV ideals as fairly and reasonably as possible. Ombudsman 05:27, 8 November 2006 (UTC)

[edit] RfA thanks

Hi Zaxem, I am very thankful to you for supporting my succesful RfA. Shyam (T/C) 06:58, 11 November 2006 (UTC)

[edit] RfA thanks

Hi Zaxem, and thanks very much for your support during my recent RfA, which succeeded with a final tally of 64/0/0. I am grateful for the overwhelming support I received from the community, and hope I will continue to earn your trust as I expand my participation on Wikipedia. It goes without saying that if you ever need anything and I can help, please let me know. Wait, I guess it does go with saying. ; ) --cholmes75 (chit chat) 22:17, 12 November 2006 (UTC)

[edit] RfA Thanks

Mike's RfA Thanks
Zaxem: Thanks very much for your support at my RfA. Unfortunately, it was clear that no consensus was going to be reached, and I have withdrawn the request at a final tally of 31/17/5. Regardless, I really appreciate your confidence in me. Despite the failure, rest assured that I will continue to edit Wikipedia as before. If all goes well, I think that I will re-apply in January or February. - Mike | Talk 04:43, 13 November 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Dalbury's RfA

My RfA passed with a tally of 71/1/0. Thank you very much for your support. I hope that my performance as an admin will not disappoint you. Please let me know if you see me doing anything inappropriate. -- Donald Albury 10:31, 14 November 2006 (UTC)

[edit] RFA Thanks

Thanks!
Thanks for your input on my (nearly recent) Request for adminship, which regretfully achived no consensus, with votes of 68/28/2. I am grateful for the input received, both positive and in opposition, and I'd like to thank you for your participation.
Georgewilliamherbert 05:06, 16 November 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Thanks for your support!

A week ago I nominated myself, hoping to be able to help Wikipedia as an administrator as much as a WikiGnome. I am very glad many others shared my thoughts, including you. Thank you for your trust! Be sure I will use these tools to protect and prevent and not to harass or punish. Should you feel I am overreacting, pat me so that I can correct myself. Thanks again! ReyBrujo 21:02, 18 November 2006 (UTC)

thanks, I've templated and protected Nicholas Tam now, jimfbleak 13:15, 22 November 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Thanks for your support

I wasn't going to send thank-you cards, but the emotional impact of hitting WP:100 (and doing so unanimously!) changed my mind. So I appreciate your confidence in me at RFA, and hope you'll let me know if I can do anything for you in the future. Cheers! -- nae'blis 23:07, 28 November 2006 (UTC)

[edit] My RfA

 Oh, the humanity!

I had my doubts about accepting a nomination for a second RfA, but even I couldn't have predicted the stir it caused as it drifted to the ground in flames! Still, it was as educational as ever. Thanks for your input; it will be on my mind as I continue to edit Wikipedia, and perhaps I will have earned your support if another nomination comes around. Kafziel Talk 14:57, 29 November 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Clive Caldwell

Thank you for contacting me. Looking back, I am not sure why I tagged that for speedy deletion, so I do apologise. I don't think that it will be deleted, but the tag may be there for a couple days (at most). --Adam Riley Talk 01:05, 14 December 2006 (UTC)

Retrieved from "http://en.wikipedia.org../../../z/a/x/User_talk%7EZaxem_af54.html"