User talk:Yvwv
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Welcome!
Hello, Yvwv, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:
- The five pillars of Wikipedia
- How to edit a page
- Help pages
- Tutorial
- How to write a great article
- Manual of Style
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}}
on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! FloNight talk 20:11, 24 February 2006 (UTC)
Contents |
[edit] Freemasonry in Sweden
Why starting a page on a topic if you have absolutely nothing to say, beyond making a placeholder for an interwiki-link? Tupsharru 08:48, 12 March 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Great call on Northern Wars
Hey I noticed the revert between you and Y on my watchlist. I see for some reason most of the articles include both wars, but the danish version for example, doesn't seem to mention the war in 1665. Another example is the Dutch. Besides that, most of the articles have very little mention of the 1665 war, and instead only include a bit of background info. Shouldn't these links be removed and left with only the articles on the 1665 war. Falphin 22:26, 1 May 2006 (UTC)
- Yvwv was right! I stand corrected. Williamborg 02:08, 2 May 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Knittel
I've added the "{{prod}}" template to the article Knittel, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but I don't believe it satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and I've explained why in the deletion notice (see also Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not and Wikipedia:Importance). Please either work to improve the article if the topic is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, or, if you disagree, discuss the issues raised at Talk:Knittel. If you remove the {{dated prod}} template, the article will not be deleted, but note that it may still be sent to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. 24fan24 00:54, 14 July 2006 (UTC)
- Actually, I've removed the delete tag and replaced it with the {{move to Wiktionary}} tag. It's more appropriate. --Tuspm Talk | Contribs | E-Mail Me 01:37, 14 July 2006 (UTC)
[edit] COTW Project
You voted for Textile, this week's Collaboration of the week. Please come and help it become a featured-standard article. Davodd 02:03, 6 August 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Post-war Sweden
Hej Yww, jag har skrivit till en del och redigerat språket litet på din artikel om Sveriges moderna historia. Har lämnat det mesta av din text oförändrad men gjort vissa omdisponeringar av bitar här och där för att göra strukturen tydligare och sätta in utvecklingen i Sverige i ett klarare internationellt sammanhang. Jag har lagt till en del också, mest om 70-80-talen (t ex om Fälldinregeringarna, IB och U-137); jag planerar en artikel om 80-talets ubåtsjakter, den finns som röd länk i texten.
Ta en titt och se vad du tycker. Strausszek September 10, 2006 01:05 (CEST)
[edit] Military history Collaboration of the Fortnight
You supported Warrior, which has been selected as the Military history WikiProject's new Collaboration of the Fortnight. Please help improve this article to featured article standards. Kirill Lokshin 00:26, 18 September 2006 (UTC)
[edit] adding request in the swedish wikipedia
Hi, yes sorry for that, i was looking for the swedish version of de:Wikipedia:Übersetzungswünsche or Wikipedia:Translation into English, (translation requests), so i had to put them on (requests for articles). I was hoping some nice wikipedian would come by and would add the four swedish names for it. that should fix it. my question: is there a translator page in the swedish wikipedia ? , cheers. Mion 11:30, 18 September 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Industry is now the Core Topics COTF
[edit] History of textiles
is a redlink - is there such an article- I do hope so! Johnbod 23:11, 5 December 2006 (UTC)
- There should be, but apparently there isn't. /Yvwv 23:14, 5 December 2006 (UTC)
well unless you intend writiung one in the near future I would remove the link! Johnbod 23:31, 5 December 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Tjeckisk historia
Are you sure this is the right Wikipedia for Tjeckisk historia ? Cheers, Angus McLellan (Talk) 16:39, 9 December 2006 (UTC)
- It was supposed for Swedish Wikipedia, but somehow it ended up here. /Yvwv 16:41, 9 December 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Ship transport
Hi, I am in the process of trying to find articles to link with a new australian maritime history project - and I am finding the heirarchy of water transport articles a bit like a hollow log. What could be the main articles are stub class and quality - I am also quite bothered by the fact that what could be a 'lead article' is so limited in its title - as 'ship' is very militing - I looked at the history of the ship transport article - and thought I'd ask you what you'd think about a change - what do you think? SatuSuro 02:54, 14 December 2006 (UTC)