User talk:Yunipo

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Contents

[edit] Welcome!

Hello, Yunipo, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! 


Brilliant! [1] - CrazyRussian talk/email 13:30, 28 July 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Richmond, BC schools

User:Phoenix Hacker has put the {{prod}} template on just about all (if not all) the schools listed in {{RichmondBCSchools}}. You might want to fix up the articles or something so you don't lose them all. Just letting you know. ~ Amalas rawr =^_^= 15:25, 28 July 2006 (UTC)

[edit] School Stub Creation, please improve

Please, take the time to make at least decent stubs out of all these school articles you are creating. One line entries saying "X is a Y school in Z" plus a template for all schools in Z is just a useless article. And for goodness sakes, don't use {{stub}} to mark them, take the time to do your own stub-sorting. That template is supposed to be used only when you have no clue what template should be used. Wikipedia:WikiProject Stub sorting/Stub types#Education gives you a list of school stub templates that you could use; Australia, Canada, Europe, India, New Zealand, the United Kingdom, the United States and every individual U.S. state. Wikipedia:Stub tells us that a stub needs to be long enough to be useful and says generally "which generally means 3 to 10 short sentences". If you write one decent stub, that is far more useful to us than 10 of these sub-stubs that need other people to come along and generate content. Additionally, adding material about why anyone outside the local region would care that the school exists will cut off deletion discussions before they begin. GRBerry 03:29, 29 July 2006 (UTC)

[edit] AfD

Just a friendly reminder: Articles for deletion is not a vote - it is a discussion. Please give reasons for keeping or deleting articles. Thanks. :) --Coredesat talk. ^_^ 19:03, 29 July 2006 (UTC)

[edit] river stubs

hi yunipo - just a quick note to say that if youre making any more river stubs, every US state has its own geo-stub so you can use oklahoma-geo-stub :) BL Lacertae - kiss the lizard 02:03, 31 July 2006 (UTC)

Yeah, but for crying out loud, stop with the single sentences. You are wasting everyone's time with these, including your own. 71.102.76.166 06:58, 31 July 2006 (UTC)

I have an account. I choose not to use it. On occasion, I pop on by to see what's going on. What you're doing is simply creating a lot of extra work. A good article should be at least 8-10 sentences long. BTW, my comment was not meant to be offensive. 71.102.76.166 07:02, 31 July 2006 (UTC)

[edit] vandalism

If you vandalize wigger again, you'll be blocked from editing.--Bonafide.hustla 06:02, 8 August 2006 (UTC)

To those reading my talk page, I did not vandalize Wikipedia. Please read my reply [2] to this message.
--Yunipo 12:21, 8 August 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Please don't edit war

Please stop reinserting the word negro in Wigger. As you can see from the article history, it's not only bonafide.hustla who considers it vandalism, User:Rlitwin does too. For my part I'm assuming that it was a good-faith edit, but you should listen to other people round here and be willing to compromise. Edit warring is frowned on. Don't revert again. Negro is generally considered offensive, and there is no need for it in the article (unlike the word nigger which is needed to explain the parts of which the word wigger is constructed. Bishonen | talk 12:46, 8 August 2006 (UTC).

[edit] Stop wikilayering

Please stop wikilawyering. Negro is a very, very insulting and derogatory terminology and everybody knows that. It's universal. Use it again then you'll be blocked.--Bonafide.hustla 07:07, 9 August 2006 (UTC)

Bonafide.hustla is obviously a troll. Please read my reply [3].
--Yunipo 16:11, 9 August 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Warning

Stop harassing bonafide.hustla. According to your contributions list, you have written to and of him nine times since he last wrote to you, which was this morning (UTC time): addressing him on his page, on your page, complaining to an admin that hes harassing you (which I find ironic) and removing a fair-use image from his userpage. (The last would be an appropriate action if performed against someone you weren't stalking; now, not so much.) This is inappropriate behavior. Besides, on the matter of fact, he has support for what he says about the usage of negro; other people have been agreeing with him; I haven't yet seen anybody agree with you. Just stop obsessing about it please. Especially, don't resort to personal attacks. You have now called bonafide.hustla "troll" three times. He's not a troll, and if I were you, I would apologize. At any rate, stop going on at him or you will receive a cautionary block. And yes, I am an administrator. Best wishes, Bishonen | talk 16:31, 9 August 2006 (UTC).

Whatever I'm leaving this shit hole. Wikipedia is filled with biased neo-conservatives who don't even follow their own policies. Administrators break the rules, and when confronted they come up with stupid excuses like "Wikilawyering".
--Yunipo 18:20, 9 August 2006 (UTC)


Please stop. If you continue to vandalize pages, as you did to Adolf Hitler, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Ucanlookitup 03:25, 10 August 2006 (UTC)

[edit] You have been blocked

You have been blocked for 48 hours for your mass vandalism of articles by inserting bonafide.hustla's joke banner in them. That should be enough time to calm down and figure out if you're interested in having a future in "this shithole" or not. Bishonen | talk 04:11, 10 August 2006 (UTC).