Talk:Yakovlev Yak-38

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

WPMILHIST This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks.
B This article has been rated as B-Class on the quality scale.
Yakovlev Yak-38 is part of WikiProject Aircraft, an attempt to better organize articles related to aircraft. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page or visit the project page where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.
B This article has been rated as B-Class on the quality scale.
(If you rated the article please give a short summary at comments to explain the ratings and/or to identify the strengths and weaknesses.)
??? This article has not yet received a rating on the importance scale.
Aviation WikiPortal

Contents

[edit] Development sequence 36 - 38 - 41

Yak-41 is quite different aircraft (as compared to 36/38 and Harrier), but

  1. it continues the development line of 36/38 Yaks
  2. it fits just the same niche as all the others naval VTOLs

Hence, I'd preserve 36-38-41 line in all the refs. --jno 09:40, 30 March 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Russian name?

There is an unofficial russian name for 36/38: "Russian: Военно-морской огурец" ("naval cucumber"). Do we need to list it on the page(s)? --jno 09:43, 30 March 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Harrier

The Yak-38 is not contemporary to or anaologous to the Harrier II. It is equivilant to the original Harrier. The AV-8B is a more recent and much more capable machine. - Aerobird 00:44, 15 April 2006 (UTC)

agree! --jno 07:36, 17 April 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Thrust/Weight

Considering that this aircraft's only highlight is it's VTOL capability, wouldn't one assume it's thrust to weight ratio exceeded 1?

[edit] Rolling Takeoff

I'm reasonably certain that I've read an article by Bill Gunston that stated that the Yak 38 was in fact capable of a loaded rolling take off. Also the same article suggested that although the Forger had multi-role capability, it's primary role was local air defense for the fleet. Anyone able to verify either of these facts? 84.92.80.169 12:55, 31 October 2006 (UTC)