User:Y0u

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is a Wikipedia user page. If you find this page on any site other than Wikipedia, you are viewing a mirror site. Be aware that the page may be outdated, and that the user this page belongs to may have no personal affiliation with any site other than Wikipedia itself. The original page is located at http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Y0u.

Important WP-related This user [1] an administrator on the English Wikipedia. This user assumes good faith. This user tries to do the right thing. If they make a mistake, please let him or her know. {{User t|1}} This user knows roughly how a template works. This user reads The Wikipedia Signpost. Do you? incl This user is a Wikipedia inclusionist. even This editor is a Wikipedia eventualist.

Yes, I know, this page is horribly organized. If you think you can do a better job and would like to try to organize it better, or reword what I've said to make it sound better, please, by all means, go ahead. If you edit this page in good faith, the worst I'll do is revert it and not consider it a "bad edit."

I have been a Wikipedian since December 2004, my Wikipediholic score is 1053, and I've been an administrator since June 30, 2005 (Thanks to all who participated in my nomination!). For the time being, I intend only to carry out speedy deletions and block obvious vandals as an admin; I may do other types of work later. Please feel free to comment on or correct me on any of my administrator actions, for which I feel that I should be held completely accountable.

I am currently a university junior, majoring in Economics and minoring in Mathematics. Also, I have very mild Asperger's syndrome. I am a Christian who is devout and a believer in the Bible, although I do not agree with any particular denomination other than being Protestant.

As far as Wikipedia, I consider myself a strong inclusionist.

If I vanish for some time, it is probably due to schoolwork.

See "theme sandbox", as I think of it, at User:Y0u/Compleat History Of The World Feel free to edit!

See video game collection at [2]. I am a serious video gamer and originally, most of my contributions here had to do with video games (and some still do.) I am also a member of WikiProject Computer and video games.

Categorization This user is a Christian. This user believes in God. ? This user believes that atheism makes no sense. This user is engaged. This user's time zone is GMT-5. This user is addicted to computer and video games. This user is an undergraduate student majoring in Economics. I studied computer programming in college, and all I got was this lousy compiler error. voc-0 This person cannot sing in tune (or has very poor singing skills). This user does not understand mean people. Please be nice. This user contributes using Internet Explorer. This user contributes using Microsoft Windows XP. vn This user page has been vandalized. This user uses Wikipedia as his or her primary point of reference. A.S. This user has Asperger syndrome. This user is a member of Wikipedia. mankind This user supports the use of gender-neutral language. they This user considers singular they standard English usage. infin¦itive This user chooses to sometimes split infinitives. whom This user insists upon using whom wherever it is called for, and fixes the errors of whomever he sees. met? This user prefers metric units, but, having grown up in the U.S., cannot relate to them. col This user is a college student. C2H6O-0 This user is a non-drinker. This user is pretty sure that he is an outlier compared to everybody else. THIS USER'S HEAD ASPLODE. This user's favourite colour is purple. This user is male.

[edit] Admin voting policy

First of all, I know that I do not vote in many RFAs that I would support by these guidelines. If I see an RFA that is obviously going to fail or (more often applied) pass, or I don't have the time to verify these, I'll skip it unless I know the user. Basically, I have three criteria that I look for in an admin, and yes, I know it's not much:

• Can the user be trusted to use the admin tools in good faith? (In other words, not do something like vandalize or unprotect the main page)
• Does the user know Wikipedia policy well enough to not misuse admin tools? (This does not mean that they have to know every single policy and guideline by heart.) Note that this does NOT cover mistakes that could be made by a non-admin; granting the user adminship would have nothing to do with these mistakes.
• Is the user at least reasonably civil? (In other words, they don't have to go out of their way to say friendly things at every possible chance, but I'd like to see that they don't have a record of violating no personal attacks.)

In borderline cases, the following are my secondary considerations ("extra credit" so to speak.) While they aren't really important themselves (and are by no means requirements to get my vote,) they may influence my vote in "borderline cases" and may influence my degree of support/opposition (strong support, weak support, etc.)

• Being exceptionally friendly and helpful.
• Being especially knowledgeable about policy.
• Experience with RC patrol, AFD, etc.
• Senority. Being here for over a year is a good sign.
• A high edit count. While I won't hesitate to vote for someone with only a few hundred edits if they fit my primary criteria, thousands certainly don't hurt and along with time spent here, they are a fair indication of general experience summed up in one number.
• Article development. Helping put a few articles up to FA status is great.

[edit] Barnstars

Here is the Random Acts of Kindness Barnstar for warmly welcoming so many new users. Being nice and going an extra mile to be kind won't hurt at all! — Stevey7788 (talk) 23:45, 13 Jun 2005 (UTC)

I award you the plain barnstar for being a well rounded amazing wikipedian :) Redwolf24 02:47, 18 July 2005 (UTC)

For randomly fixing my spelling of "neutral", I, Matt Yeager, hereby award you, Y0u, this kicking Minor Barnstar Award. Have an awesome day. Matt Yeager 06:07, 11 October 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Guestbook- Sign here if you visited my userpage

I don't have a registered username, nor do I have a huge amount of edits, but I love Wikipedia. Consider your guestbook signed. By a random number, but still. --69.145.122.209 00:06, 29 March 2006 (UTC)

• Hey, here's a real sig for you! --Mister Wiggles 04:04, 15 June 2006 (UTC)

Here's a signature from New Zealand Blair 10:41, 3 July 2006 (UTC)

• I came, I left random numbers, and I left. 142.165.222.173 04:38, 9 July 2006 (UTC)

• Just wandered in! Colonial One 06:48, 26 July 2006 (UTC)

• Nice page, man. Son of Bríghde 05:23, 4 August 2006 (UTC)

• Hello.--Lkjhgfdsa 01:59, 12 August 2006 (UTC)

• pops head in* btg2290 19:47, 16 October 2006 (UTC)

• While fixing your outlier userbox, I might as well sign. Picaroon9288 02:41, 22 October 2006 (UTC)
• Just passing, may as well sign though... --CarrotMan 14:55, 25 October 2006 (UTC)

• Came up on my daily rummaging though the users. Wost I can do is sign here. Kaiser matias 09:04, 9 November 2006 (UTC)
• s d 3 1 4 1 5 final exams! 21:07, 9 December 2006 (UTC)