Talk:Xilinx
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
[edit] Revenue
Is their revenue really ~$1,600 billion/year201.238.87.156 03:54, 26 February 2006 (UTC)Yashiv
- No, it's in the general vicinity of $1.6 billin/year, verified by press releases and trade journal articles. I've corrected it. --Brouhaha 21:00, 27 February 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Acronyms
Acronyms should be expanded, like ACR (Acronym) or Acronym (ACR).
-Mardus 10:24, 8 June 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Merge to Xilinx
- (discussing merge of Virtex4)
Agree to merge. I doubt there would ever be enough content for this article to justify standing by itself. The only alternative I can think of besides merging it directly to the Xilinx article is to make a "Xilinx family details" article which goes into as much technical detail on each family and contrasts them. This would allow the Xilinx article itself to focus more on the higher level summary without being overly long with extreme details that most readers would not understand. Mrand 22:56, 16 August 2006 (UTC)
Merge - Should've put my vote when I slapped that merge tag on in the first place. ;) — RevRagnarok Talk Contrib 23:24, 16 August 2006 (UTC)
- Merge - Agree it is greatly ripped from the brochures, and need not be; add some real-life testimonials (academic or industry articles) to explain their use. Peter Ellis 06:38, 4 September 2006 (UTC)
Don't merge - I think the article already has enough content to justify standing by itself. Even if it requires some cleanup. It would look silly in a section on Product Families mentioning lots of details from a single family. --Romanski 16:56, 24 September 2006 (UTC)
