User talk:Wrp103

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Archived on August 2006: Conversations that are probably finished Jul 2004-Jul 2006 (Not sure why anyone cares, but just in case. ;^)

/Jeff Lindsay — My original attempt at a rewrite of his page.

/Cockburn — My sandbox for Bruce Cockburn

Contents 1 List of Chrono Trigger Endings 2 Regarding Radiata Stories 3 Dialogue at CoJCoLDS 4 POV tag 5 Gorillas 6 Dispute at anti-Mormon 7 Librarius erectus (Cambridge University) 8 Vandalism 9 Sorry 10 abstract data type (ADT) error? 11 November 2006 Mormon Collaboration 12 Other Folks Comments

[edit] List of Chrono Trigger Endings

It's very cool to see the guy who wrote the classic list I used way back in the day and referenced recently while compiling some game information myself. If you're still a Chrono Trigger fan, I'd appreciate your feedback on a guide I've been working on: http://strategywiki.net/wiki/Chrono_Trigger

I've broken the walkthrough into chapters based on the name of the Save Game File since its an easy reference point, and also because there's a one to one mapping between chapters and endings in all but two cases (the ending where Crono talks occurs in the same chapter as another ending, and two endings can fall on the chapter: "The Masamune" depending upon whether you have Frog in your party or not)

That mapping makes it easy to reference what ending is possible if you beat the game at any point during the walkthrough, and it makes it clear on the "endings" list what the possible intervals for each ending are. I've also tried to map out the one other tricky sequence in the game, The Trial, which is slightly glitched based upon my observation: http://strategywiki.net/wiki/Chrono_Trigger/Walkthrough/Chapter_4

Anyway, you've helped me out (indirectly) in the past, if you can provide any advice or edits to the wiki guide, it'd be much appreciated. Thanks!--BigCow 20:17, 20 June 2006 (UTC)

Glad to hear from somebody who enjoyed my FAQ. When the PS version came out, I couldn't find my original HTML file - only the text file in gamefaqs. I then used google and found several copies of my original file with other peoples' names on it, so I guess others enjoyed it was well. ;^)

I looked at your wikistrategy entry and made a few tweaks, but don't have much time to spend on it right now. I'll look closer later. wrp103 (Bill Pringle) 23:46, 20 June 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Regarding Radiata Stories

Just wanted to let you know that when I deleted the spam links, I never meant to imply that yours was, too! I checked the link out and was greatly impressed, and wanted to keep it in there, I just didn't know the protocol. I know I've tried selectively deleting links like that in the pas, only to get hounded by the guys whose links came out on the short end of that stick, so on this instance I took an all or nothing approach. But glad to see it's back up. Keep up the good work. --Bkessler23 18:43, 24 July 2006 (UTC)

I didn't think you were implying it was a spam link, although me adding it back in could be called that. ;^) I had considered deleting those same links, so I was glad to see that you had done it. wrp103 (Bill Pringle) 18:58, 24 July 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Dialogue at CoJCoLDS

Thanks for reverting that; for some reason (dyslexia? didn't know I had it), I misread that as something like "A dialogue of Mormons" or something else that appeared inane. Tijuana Brass^¡Épa! 23:23, 29 July 2006 (UTC)

No problem. I was glad to see that it was online, and got a chance to re-read my favorite article: "The Meeting" wrp103 (Bill Pringle) 03:30, 30 July 2006 (UTC)

[edit] POV tag

I'd appreciate your thoughts here. --uriah923^(talk) 22:39, 9 August 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Gorillas

Hi, please see the discussions page. i'm trying to reach a compromise here. IMHO, it is not acceptable to have the US and not UK conversions. Either both or neither - i don't actually care which. We are getting into a situation where this constant editting and reversion is silly. can't we come to an agreement?

Cheers Fred --Yaf201 12:51, 8 September 2006 (UTC)

Bill,

Thanks for joining the mediation. I think by adding yourself as an interested party you need to sign under the "agree" bit. As I understand it that agreement is to take part in the mediation not signifying that we have agreed an outcome.

Fred --Yaf201 15:07, 11 September 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Dispute at anti-Mormon

In order to gain a consensus concerning the issue at anti-Mormon, would you please comment here? --uriah923^(talk) 04:23, 25 September 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Librarius erectus (Cambridge University)

Reverting is fine - but it was a genuine comment at teh time and I think it is rather good.

Best wishes

Johnbibby 15:15, 16 October 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Vandalism

I did not leave Vandalism. Please let me know what actions on my part suggested vandalism and I will change the method of my updates.

But to be clear, nothing I changed or added should be considered inaccurate.

I can be contacted directly if you would like to discuss. My name is Pete. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 63.251.211.5 (talk • contribs) 19:19, 25 October 2006.

I appreciate the feedback. I also understand the need to monitor multipel edits. FYI, I will begin using the Sandbox. I can see how multiple edits to an entry over short period would look suspicious.

Thanks for the quick response.

Pete —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 63.251.211.5 (talk • contribs) 20:09, 25 October 2006.

[edit] Sorry

My son was recently online, i have talked to him about his behavior and he is sorry too. I know this will not happen again. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 67.176.168.234 (talk • contribs) 20:10, 26 October 2006.

[edit] abstract data type (ADT) error?

I tried to make an edit to correct your page about abstract data types. You list "linked list" and "binary search tree" as abstract data types, and I removed them from the list because I believe they should not be included. I was not attempting to vandalize the entry or "experiment" as you said in your message to me.

An abstract data type should not specify an implementation; therefore a linked list is certainly NOT an ADT. A list, also written in the page, IS an ADT. But not a linked list, no more than an array list.

For the same reason, a binary search tree is not an ADT. Binary search trees are, like linked lists, particular data structures and not implementation-independent. A binary search tree can be *USED* to implement an ADT such as a set or map. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 23:54, 26 October 2006 67.183.30.43 (talk • contribs) .

[edit] November 2006 Mormon Collaboration

The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints has been selected as the November Mormon collaboration of the month. I look forward to working with you on it. --uriah923^(talk) 21:48, 1 November 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Other Folks Comments

Thanks for the concern about editing other peoples comments on the Mormonism and Christianity page, I was actually updating my own comments but I forgot to log in as mpschmitt1. Sorry about that...