Talk:Works analogous to Harry Potter

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Works analogous to Harry Potter article.
Please sign and date your posts using four tildes (~~~~). New discussion topics go at the bottom of the page; click here to start a new topic. New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Frequently asked questions. This is not a forum for general discussion about the article's subject.	Talk page guidelines Be polite Assume good faith No personal attacks Don't bite the newcomers!

	This page is within the scope of WikiProject Harry Potter, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to J. K. Rowling's Harry Potter universe. If you would like to participate, you can choose to edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks.
B This article has been rated as Class B on the quality scale. High This article has been rated as High-Importance on the importance scale.

[edit] Groosham Grange

Years ago, I read the children's novel "Groosham Grange" written by Anthony Horowitz and I found it rather similar to Harry Potter. "Groosham Grange" was published in 1988 by Methuen (Check out: http://www.amazon.co.uk/gp/product/0416024629/026-7434006-7294052?v=glance&n=266239) and 1995 by Walker Books. I wonder if this qualifies as a work analogous to Harry Potter. Doberdog 13:15, 16 July 2006 (UTC)Doberdog

I added it to the article before I read your comment. The book is another "oft mentioned" and definitely belongs here. I haven't read it myself so I can't elaborate.--woggly 07:15, 12 September 2006 (UTC)

[edit] "public accusations"

The only one who ever actually brought a court case against Rowling was Nancy Stouffer. As Neil Gaiman explicitly denies ever having considered suing Rowling, and details the source of the misunderstanding (an overzealous reporter from "The Scotsman"), I don't think this belongs in the same category. If someone complaining on a webpage, or even an article in a paper, count as "public rumors of plagiarism", then a lot more of these authors qualify. For example, the old rumour that Jill Murphy brought legal action against Rowling, which is still up on IMDB: [1]. A pity IMDB has not seen fit to remove the rumour, though it is without foundation, as I have pointed out to them in a letter in the past. --woggly 07:56, 12 September 2006 (UTC)

Do you know where I could find an authorative source that sates that Murphy did not consider suing Rowling? Because I've been scouring the web for weeks and haven't found one. THanks Serendipodous 14:13, 7 November 2006 (UTC)